Hydropower development and the meaning of place. Multi-ethnic hydropower struggles in Sikkim, India

Rinchu Doma Dukpa, Deepa Joshi, Rutgerd Boelens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Academic research and media tend to emphasize the strong opposition to hydropower development in Sikkim, India, and position this as resistance to an environmentally-destructive, trans-local development, particularly by the culturally-rooted, ethnic minority Bhutia and Lepcha communities. There are several accounts of contestations of hydropower development projects in India’s Eastern Himalayan States – signifying robust and predictable indigenous people-place connections. Why then, was the implementation of the largest, Teesta Stage III Hydro Electric Project, located in Chungthang Gram Panchayat Unit in North Sikkim, in the heartland of the Bhutia-Lepcha region, not contested? In unraveling this anomaly, our focus is to understand how people-place connections are shaped and differentially experienced. Our findings are that hydropower development has elicited diverse responses locally, ranging from fierce contestation to indifference, to enthusiastic acceptance. The complexity and malleability of “place” and people’s “sense of place” provide evidence that indigeneity does not always indicate resistance to large-scale project interventions. In ethnically and socio-politically fractured communities like Chungthang, trans-local developments can reinforce ethno-social divides and disparities, and re-align traditional place-based ethno-centric solidarities along new politically-motivated lines. We argue that linear, one-dimensional views of local social coalescence around place belie more complex relations, which evolve dynamically in diverse socio-cultural and politico-economic contexts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-72
Number of pages13
JournalGeoforum
Volume89
Early online date3 Feb 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2018

Fingerprint

hydropower
India
development project
national minority
solidarity
community
opposition
acceptance
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • Hydropower
  • Contestation
  • Solidarities
  • Ethnicity
  • Sense of place
  • Sikkim
  • India

Cite this

Hydropower development and the meaning of place. Multi-ethnic hydropower struggles in Sikkim, India. / Doma Dukpa, Rinchu; Joshi, Deepa; Boelens, Rutgerd.

In: Geoforum, Vol. 89, 02.2018, p. 60-72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a858316fe2e24bac82b2431c6ced7cc8,
title = "Hydropower development and the meaning of place. Multi-ethnic hydropower struggles in Sikkim, India",
abstract = "Academic research and media tend to emphasize the strong opposition to hydropower development in Sikkim, India, and position this as resistance to an environmentally-destructive, trans-local development, particularly by the culturally-rooted, ethnic minority Bhutia and Lepcha communities. There are several accounts of contestations of hydropower development projects in India’s Eastern Himalayan States – signifying robust and predictable indigenous people-place connections. Why then, was the implementation of the largest, Teesta Stage III Hydro Electric Project, located in Chungthang Gram Panchayat Unit in North Sikkim, in the heartland of the Bhutia-Lepcha region, not contested? In unraveling this anomaly, our focus is to understand how people-place connections are shaped and differentially experienced. Our findings are that hydropower development has elicited diverse responses locally, ranging from fierce contestation to indifference, to enthusiastic acceptance. The complexity and malleability of “place” and people’s “sense of place” provide evidence that indigeneity does not always indicate resistance to large-scale project interventions. In ethnically and socio-politically fractured communities like Chungthang, trans-local developments can reinforce ethno-social divides and disparities, and re-align traditional place-based ethno-centric solidarities along new politically-motivated lines. We argue that linear, one-dimensional views of local social coalescence around place belie more complex relations, which evolve dynamically in diverse socio-cultural and politico-economic contexts.",
keywords = "Hydropower, Contestation, Solidarities, Ethnicity, Sense of place, Sikkim, India",
author = "{Doma Dukpa}, Rinchu and Deepa Joshi and Rutgerd Boelens",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.006",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "60--72",
journal = "Geoforum",
issn = "0016-7185",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hydropower development and the meaning of place. Multi-ethnic hydropower struggles in Sikkim, India

AU - Doma Dukpa, Rinchu

AU - Joshi, Deepa

AU - Boelens, Rutgerd

PY - 2018/2

Y1 - 2018/2

N2 - Academic research and media tend to emphasize the strong opposition to hydropower development in Sikkim, India, and position this as resistance to an environmentally-destructive, trans-local development, particularly by the culturally-rooted, ethnic minority Bhutia and Lepcha communities. There are several accounts of contestations of hydropower development projects in India’s Eastern Himalayan States – signifying robust and predictable indigenous people-place connections. Why then, was the implementation of the largest, Teesta Stage III Hydro Electric Project, located in Chungthang Gram Panchayat Unit in North Sikkim, in the heartland of the Bhutia-Lepcha region, not contested? In unraveling this anomaly, our focus is to understand how people-place connections are shaped and differentially experienced. Our findings are that hydropower development has elicited diverse responses locally, ranging from fierce contestation to indifference, to enthusiastic acceptance. The complexity and malleability of “place” and people’s “sense of place” provide evidence that indigeneity does not always indicate resistance to large-scale project interventions. In ethnically and socio-politically fractured communities like Chungthang, trans-local developments can reinforce ethno-social divides and disparities, and re-align traditional place-based ethno-centric solidarities along new politically-motivated lines. We argue that linear, one-dimensional views of local social coalescence around place belie more complex relations, which evolve dynamically in diverse socio-cultural and politico-economic contexts.

AB - Academic research and media tend to emphasize the strong opposition to hydropower development in Sikkim, India, and position this as resistance to an environmentally-destructive, trans-local development, particularly by the culturally-rooted, ethnic minority Bhutia and Lepcha communities. There are several accounts of contestations of hydropower development projects in India’s Eastern Himalayan States – signifying robust and predictable indigenous people-place connections. Why then, was the implementation of the largest, Teesta Stage III Hydro Electric Project, located in Chungthang Gram Panchayat Unit in North Sikkim, in the heartland of the Bhutia-Lepcha region, not contested? In unraveling this anomaly, our focus is to understand how people-place connections are shaped and differentially experienced. Our findings are that hydropower development has elicited diverse responses locally, ranging from fierce contestation to indifference, to enthusiastic acceptance. The complexity and malleability of “place” and people’s “sense of place” provide evidence that indigeneity does not always indicate resistance to large-scale project interventions. In ethnically and socio-politically fractured communities like Chungthang, trans-local developments can reinforce ethno-social divides and disparities, and re-align traditional place-based ethno-centric solidarities along new politically-motivated lines. We argue that linear, one-dimensional views of local social coalescence around place belie more complex relations, which evolve dynamically in diverse socio-cultural and politico-economic contexts.

KW - Hydropower

KW - Contestation

KW - Solidarities

KW - Ethnicity

KW - Sense of place

KW - Sikkim

KW - India

U2 - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.006

DO - 10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.01.006

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 60

EP - 72

JO - Geoforum

JF - Geoforum

SN - 0016-7185

ER -