Human Error in Flight

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 80% of accidents human error is one of the main causal factors. However, pilot error is not easy to de- fi ne. This paper looks at various ideas of what constitutes human error on the fl ight deck and critically examines some current models of error with respect to modern fl ight operations. The paper then looks at some methods by which error may be eliminated or managed before concluding with a contrasting view of fl ight safety, which rejects the simple idea of error and suggests that most accidents are the product of normal (but uncontrolled) working practices.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)12-25
Number of pages13
Journal Italian Journal of Aerospace Medicine
Volume4
Issue number7
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Accidents

Cite this

Human Error in Flight. / Harris, Don.

In: Italian Journal of Aerospace Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 7, 2012, p. 12-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cc3b4ad3220a481b8a7974a15673d6ad,
title = "Human Error in Flight",
abstract = "In 80{\%} of accidents human error is one of the main causal factors. However, pilot error is not easy to de- fi ne. This paper looks at various ideas of what constitutes human error on the fl ight deck and critically examines some current models of error with respect to modern fl ight operations. The paper then looks at some methods by which error may be eliminated or managed before concluding with a contrasting view of fl ight safety, which rejects the simple idea of error and suggests that most accidents are the product of normal (but uncontrolled) working practices.",
author = "Don Harris",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
pages = "12--25",
journal = "Italian Journal of Aerospace Medicine",
issn = "2279-8994",
publisher = "Italian Society of Aerospace Medicine (AIMAS)",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Human Error in Flight

AU - Harris, Don

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - In 80% of accidents human error is one of the main causal factors. However, pilot error is not easy to de- fi ne. This paper looks at various ideas of what constitutes human error on the fl ight deck and critically examines some current models of error with respect to modern fl ight operations. The paper then looks at some methods by which error may be eliminated or managed before concluding with a contrasting view of fl ight safety, which rejects the simple idea of error and suggests that most accidents are the product of normal (but uncontrolled) working practices.

AB - In 80% of accidents human error is one of the main causal factors. However, pilot error is not easy to de- fi ne. This paper looks at various ideas of what constitutes human error on the fl ight deck and critically examines some current models of error with respect to modern fl ight operations. The paper then looks at some methods by which error may be eliminated or managed before concluding with a contrasting view of fl ight safety, which rejects the simple idea of error and suggests that most accidents are the product of normal (but uncontrolled) working practices.

M3 - Article

VL - 4

SP - 12

EP - 25

JO - Italian Journal of Aerospace Medicine

JF - Italian Journal of Aerospace Medicine

SN - 2279-8994

IS - 7

ER -