How we can make ecotoxicology more valuable to environmental protection

M. L. Hanson, B. A. Wolff, J. W. Green, M. Kivi, G. H. Panter, Michael St. John Warne, M. Ågerstrand, J. P. Sumpter

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    41 Citations (Scopus)
    71 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    There is increasing awareness that the value of peer-reviewed scientific literature is not consistent, resulting in a growing desire to improve the practice and reporting of studies. This is especially important in the field of ecotoxicology, where regulatory decisions can be partly based on data from the peer-reviewed literature, with wide-reaching implications for environmental protection. Our objective is to improve the reporting of ecotoxicology studies so that they can be appropriately utilized in a fair and transparent fashion, based on their reliability and relevance. We propose a series of nine reporting requirements, followed by a set of recommendations for adoption by the ecotoxicology community. These reporting requirements will provide clarity on the the test chemical, experimental design and conditions, chemical identification, test organisms, exposure confirmation, measurable endpoints, how data are presented, data availability and statistical analysis. Providing these specific details will allow for a fuller assessment of the reliability and relevance of the studies, including limitations. Recommendations for the implementation of these reporting requirements are provided herein for practitioners, journals, reviewers, regulators, stakeholders, funders, and professional societies. If applied, our recommendations will improve the quality of ecotoxicology studies and their value to environmental protection.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)228-235
    Number of pages18
    JournalScience of the Total Environment
    Volume578
    Early online date6 Aug 2016
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2017

    Bibliographical note

    NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Science of the Total Environment. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Science of the Total Environment, VOL 578, (2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.160

    © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Keywords

    • Publications
    • Quality
    • Reliability
    • Relevance
    • Risk assessment
    • Reporting recommendations
    • Peer review

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How we can make ecotoxicology more valuable to environmental protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this