How should digital tools for writing be evaluated?: Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics

Niall Curry

doi:10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970

How should digital tools for writing be evaluated? Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics

Niall Curry

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

83 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Use of digital tools in academic literacies remains an emerging field. This dialogue responds to Schcolnik (2018) by arguing the benefits of considering the use of such tools in light of advances in digital pedagogies and applied linguistics. Going beyond understanding how academic writing developers engage with digital tools, an important next step is to consider whether their use of such tools is effective.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	53-28
Number of pages	6
Journal	Journal of Academic Writing
Volume	13
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970
Publication status	Published - 31 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Access to Document

10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970

CurryN_dialogue_DigiTool_JoAWAccepted author manuscript, 581 KB
PublishedFinal published version, 639 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{ce11fbeb12444144bd69cf564e4951e1,

title = "How should digital tools for writing be evaluated?: Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics",

abstract = "Use of digital tools in academic literacies remains an emerging field. This dialogue responds to Schcolnik (2018) by arguing the benefits of considering the use of such tools in light of advances in digital pedagogies and applied linguistics. Going beyond understanding how academic writing developers engage with digital tools, an important next step is to consider whether their use of such tools is effective.",

author = "Niall Curry",

note = "This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.",

year = "2023",

month = jul,

day = "31",

doi = "10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970",

language = "English",

volume = "13",

pages = "53--28",

journal = "Journal of Academic Writing",

issn = "2225-8973",

publisher = "Coventry University",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How should digital tools for writing be evaluated?

T2 - Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics

AU - Curry, Niall

N1 - This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

PY - 2023/7/31

Y1 - 2023/7/31

N2 - Use of digital tools in academic literacies remains an emerging field. This dialogue responds to Schcolnik (2018) by arguing the benefits of considering the use of such tools in light of advances in digital pedagogies and applied linguistics. Going beyond understanding how academic writing developers engage with digital tools, an important next step is to consider whether their use of such tools is effective.

AB - Use of digital tools in academic literacies remains an emerging field. This dialogue responds to Schcolnik (2018) by arguing the benefits of considering the use of such tools in light of advances in digital pedagogies and applied linguistics. Going beyond understanding how academic writing developers engage with digital tools, an important next step is to consider whether their use of such tools is effective.

UR - https://publications.coventry.ac.uk/index.php/joaw/article/view/970

U2 - 10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970

DO - 10.18552/joaw.v13i1.970

M3 - Article

SN - 2225-8973

VL - 13

SP - 53

EP - 28

JO - Journal of Academic Writing

JF - Journal of Academic Writing

IS - 1

ER -

How should digital tools for writing be evaluated? Reflections from Digital Pedagogies and Applied Linguistics

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this