Abstract
This paper investigates leadership dynamics in research teams. It studies how principal investigators (PIs) and team members cultivate their relationship through the lens of leader-member exchange theory (LMX). Thirty-one in-depth interviews with both PIs and team members across 15 externally funded teams in the UK are analysed. The findings show that these relationships can be characterised along four influential dimensions: positional layer; informal layer; and the newly identified political layer and life domain. These layers show how PIs balance between formal and informal power structures, and, more broadly, how leadership dynamics go beyond the specific context in which a team is situated and members work. The notion constructing working relationships is proposed to stress on the need for both PIs and members to engage in a process of balancing potential tensions. Thus, the paper provides PIs with insights into the nature of leadership within a research team and recommendations regarding team design.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 726-740 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Higher Education Quarterly |
| Volume | 76 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Early online date | 5 Jul 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2022 |
Bibliographical note
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution andreproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
Funding
Empirically, this paper investigates disciplinary teams within externally funded research projects. Through the voices of both PIs and team members of 15 teams located across a wide spectrum of universities in the UK, this paper explores how the individualised relationship between the PI and each team member is conceptualised. This investigation will allow scholars and researchers to appreciate the importance of communication, informality, and politics within a research team. Therefore, this paper builds on Takala and Keskinen's ( 2014 ) claim for the need of a “tailor made approach” to build an effective relation between an employer and an employee in a university context. Also, it contributes to HE literature by looking into the “small structure” of universities, as envisaged by Townsend et al. ( 2015 , p. 672). It justifies the usefulness of relational leadership approaches to understand, illuminate and develop leadership practices in HE.
Keywords
- leader-member exchange (LMX)
- leadership
- political empowerment
- principal investigator (PI)
- research teams
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Education