How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city

Leo X. C. Dutra, Catherine M. Dichmont, Ingrid E. van Putten, Olivier Thébaud, Roy A. Deng, Ricardo Pascual, Randall Owens, Eddie Jebreen, Carolyn Thompson, Michael St. John Warne, R. Quinn, J. Bennett, M. Read, D. Wachenfeld, Catherine Collier, Michelle Waycott, J. Davies, A. Garland, M. Dunning, J. Playford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Defining goals and objectives is a critical component of adaptive management of natural resources because they provide the basis on which management strategies can be designed and evaluated. The aims of this study are: (i) to apply and test a collaborative method to elicit goals and objectives for inshore fisheries and biodiversity in the coastal zone of a regional city in Australia; (ii) to understand the relative importance of management objectives for different community members and stakeholders; and (iii) to understand how diverse perceptions about the importance of management objectives can be used to support multiple-use management in Australia’s iconic Great Barrier Reef. Management goals and objectives were elicited and weighted using the following steps: (i) literature review of management objectives, (ii) development of a hierarchy tree of objectives, and (iii) ranking of management objectives using survey methods. The overarching goals identified by the community group were to: (1) protect and restore inshore environmental assets; (2) improve governance systems; and (3) improve regional (socio-economic) well-being. Interestingly, these goals differ slightly from the usual triple-bottom line objectives (environmental, social and economic) often found in the literature. The objectives were ranked using the Analytical Hierarchical Process, where a total of 141 respondents from industry, government agencies, and community from across Queensland State undertook the survey. The environment goal received the highest scores, followed by governance and lastly well-being. The approach to elicit and rank goals and objectives developed in this study can be used to effectively support coastal resource management by providing opportunities for local communities to participate in the setting of regional objectives.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229–241
Number of pages13
JournalMarine Policy
Volume71
Early online date22 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2016

Fingerprint

coasts
coast
management
survey method
multiple use
adaptive management
barrier reef
community
city
Coast
literature review
ranking
coastal zone
well-being
resource management
governance
stakeholder
fishery
biodiversity
government agency

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Marine Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Marine Policy, [71, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020

© 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Keywords

  • Great Barrier Reef
  • Knowledge elicitation
  • Management prioritisation
  • Coastal zone management

Cite this

Dutra, L. X. C., Dichmont, C. M., van Putten, I. E., Thébaud, O., Deng, R. A., Pascual, R., ... Playford, J. (2016). How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city. Marine Policy, 71, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020

How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city. / Dutra, Leo X. C.; Dichmont, Catherine M.; van Putten, Ingrid E.; Thébaud, Olivier; Deng, Roy A.; Pascual, Ricardo; Owens, Randall; Jebreen, Eddie; Thompson, Carolyn; Warne, Michael St. John; Quinn, R.; Bennett, J.; Read, M.; Wachenfeld, D.; Collier, Catherine; Waycott, Michelle; Davies, J.; Garland, A.; Dunning, M.; Playford, J.

In: Marine Policy, Vol. 71, 09.2016, p. 229–241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dutra, LXC, Dichmont, CM, van Putten, IE, Thébaud, O, Deng, RA, Pascual, R, Owens, R, Jebreen, E, Thompson, C, Warne, MSJ, Quinn, R, Bennett, J, Read, M, Wachenfeld, D, Collier, C, Waycott, M, Davies, J, Garland, A, Dunning, M & Playford, J 2016, 'How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city' Marine Policy, vol. 71, pp. 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020
Dutra LXC, Dichmont CM, van Putten IE, Thébaud O, Deng RA, Pascual R et al. How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city. Marine Policy. 2016 Sep;71:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020
Dutra, Leo X. C. ; Dichmont, Catherine M. ; van Putten, Ingrid E. ; Thébaud, Olivier ; Deng, Roy A. ; Pascual, Ricardo ; Owens, Randall ; Jebreen, Eddie ; Thompson, Carolyn ; Warne, Michael St. John ; Quinn, R. ; Bennett, J. ; Read, M. ; Wachenfeld, D. ; Collier, Catherine ; Waycott, Michelle ; Davies, J. ; Garland, A. ; Dunning, M. ; Playford, J. / How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city. In: Marine Policy. 2016 ; Vol. 71. pp. 229–241.
@article{19511132644a461ea77ad8024694cc76,
title = "How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city",
abstract = "Defining goals and objectives is a critical component of adaptive management of natural resources because they provide the basis on which management strategies can be designed and evaluated. The aims of this study are: (i) to apply and test a collaborative method to elicit goals and objectives for inshore fisheries and biodiversity in the coastal zone of a regional city in Australia; (ii) to understand the relative importance of management objectives for different community members and stakeholders; and (iii) to understand how diverse perceptions about the importance of management objectives can be used to support multiple-use management in Australia’s iconic Great Barrier Reef. Management goals and objectives were elicited and weighted using the following steps: (i) literature review of management objectives, (ii) development of a hierarchy tree of objectives, and (iii) ranking of management objectives using survey methods. The overarching goals identified by the community group were to: (1) protect and restore inshore environmental assets; (2) improve governance systems; and (3) improve regional (socio-economic) well-being. Interestingly, these goals differ slightly from the usual triple-bottom line objectives (environmental, social and economic) often found in the literature. The objectives were ranked using the Analytical Hierarchical Process, where a total of 141 respondents from industry, government agencies, and community from across Queensland State undertook the survey. The environment goal received the highest scores, followed by governance and lastly well-being. The approach to elicit and rank goals and objectives developed in this study can be used to effectively support coastal resource management by providing opportunities for local communities to participate in the setting of regional objectives.",
keywords = "Great Barrier Reef, Knowledge elicitation, Management prioritisation, Coastal zone management",
author = "Dutra, {Leo X. C.} and Dichmont, {Catherine M.} and {van Putten}, {Ingrid E.} and Olivier Th{\'e}baud and Deng, {Roy A.} and Ricardo Pascual and Randall Owens and Eddie Jebreen and Carolyn Thompson and Warne, {Michael St. John} and R. Quinn and J. Bennett and M. Read and D. Wachenfeld and Catherine Collier and Michelle Waycott and J. Davies and A. Garland and M. Dunning and J. Playford",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Marine Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Marine Policy, [71, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020 {\circledC} 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "229–241",
journal = "Marine Policy",
issn = "0308-597X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How important is the coast? A survey of coastal objectives in an Australian regional city

AU - Dutra, Leo X. C.

AU - Dichmont, Catherine M.

AU - van Putten, Ingrid E.

AU - Thébaud, Olivier

AU - Deng, Roy A.

AU - Pascual, Ricardo

AU - Owens, Randall

AU - Jebreen, Eddie

AU - Thompson, Carolyn

AU - Warne, Michael St. John

AU - Quinn, R.

AU - Bennett, J.

AU - Read, M.

AU - Wachenfeld, D.

AU - Collier, Catherine

AU - Waycott, Michelle

AU - Davies, J.

AU - Garland, A.

AU - Dunning, M.

AU - Playford, J.

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Marine Policy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Marine Policy, [71, (2016)] DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020 © 2016, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

PY - 2016/9

Y1 - 2016/9

N2 - Defining goals and objectives is a critical component of adaptive management of natural resources because they provide the basis on which management strategies can be designed and evaluated. The aims of this study are: (i) to apply and test a collaborative method to elicit goals and objectives for inshore fisheries and biodiversity in the coastal zone of a regional city in Australia; (ii) to understand the relative importance of management objectives for different community members and stakeholders; and (iii) to understand how diverse perceptions about the importance of management objectives can be used to support multiple-use management in Australia’s iconic Great Barrier Reef. Management goals and objectives were elicited and weighted using the following steps: (i) literature review of management objectives, (ii) development of a hierarchy tree of objectives, and (iii) ranking of management objectives using survey methods. The overarching goals identified by the community group were to: (1) protect and restore inshore environmental assets; (2) improve governance systems; and (3) improve regional (socio-economic) well-being. Interestingly, these goals differ slightly from the usual triple-bottom line objectives (environmental, social and economic) often found in the literature. The objectives were ranked using the Analytical Hierarchical Process, where a total of 141 respondents from industry, government agencies, and community from across Queensland State undertook the survey. The environment goal received the highest scores, followed by governance and lastly well-being. The approach to elicit and rank goals and objectives developed in this study can be used to effectively support coastal resource management by providing opportunities for local communities to participate in the setting of regional objectives.

AB - Defining goals and objectives is a critical component of adaptive management of natural resources because they provide the basis on which management strategies can be designed and evaluated. The aims of this study are: (i) to apply and test a collaborative method to elicit goals and objectives for inshore fisheries and biodiversity in the coastal zone of a regional city in Australia; (ii) to understand the relative importance of management objectives for different community members and stakeholders; and (iii) to understand how diverse perceptions about the importance of management objectives can be used to support multiple-use management in Australia’s iconic Great Barrier Reef. Management goals and objectives were elicited and weighted using the following steps: (i) literature review of management objectives, (ii) development of a hierarchy tree of objectives, and (iii) ranking of management objectives using survey methods. The overarching goals identified by the community group were to: (1) protect and restore inshore environmental assets; (2) improve governance systems; and (3) improve regional (socio-economic) well-being. Interestingly, these goals differ slightly from the usual triple-bottom line objectives (environmental, social and economic) often found in the literature. The objectives were ranked using the Analytical Hierarchical Process, where a total of 141 respondents from industry, government agencies, and community from across Queensland State undertook the survey. The environment goal received the highest scores, followed by governance and lastly well-being. The approach to elicit and rank goals and objectives developed in this study can be used to effectively support coastal resource management by providing opportunities for local communities to participate in the setting of regional objectives.

KW - Great Barrier Reef

KW - Knowledge elicitation

KW - Management prioritisation

KW - Coastal zone management

U2 - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020

DO - 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.05.020

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - 229

EP - 241

JO - Marine Policy

JF - Marine Policy

SN - 0308-597X

ER -