How do we cope with ostracism? Psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between everyday ostracism experiences and psychological distress

Daniel Waldeck, Ian Tyndall, Paulo Riva, Nik Chmiel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper examined the relationship between everyday experiences of ostracism and psychological distress by focusing on the potential moderating role of psychological flexibility. As expected, data from a two-wave survey of 299 internet users (Study 1) indicated that perceived ostracism was positively related to psychological distress. However, the findings revealed that when psychological flexibility was low, the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was significant. By contrast, we found that for those with high levels of psychological flexibility the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was no longer significant. This pattern of findings was replicated in a separate two-wave survey of 231 internet users (Study 2). Implications of the present research suggest that strategies to increase psychological flexibility may help individuals cope with everyday experiences of ostracism.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)425-432
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Volume6
Issue number4
Early online date12 Sep 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2017
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

everyday experience
flexibility
Internet

Keywords

  • ostracism
  • psychological flexibility
  • acceptance and commitment therapy
  • distress

Cite this

How do we cope with ostracism? Psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between everyday ostracism experiences and psychological distress. / Waldeck, Daniel; Tyndall, Ian; Riva, Paulo; Chmiel, Nik.

In: Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, Vol. 6, No. 4, 10.2017, p. 425-432.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{acda278166de4f059e8ff91d0d890148,
title = "How do we cope with ostracism? Psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between everyday ostracism experiences and psychological distress",
abstract = "The present paper examined the relationship between everyday experiences of ostracism and psychological distress by focusing on the potential moderating role of psychological flexibility. As expected, data from a two-wave survey of 299 internet users (Study 1) indicated that perceived ostracism was positively related to psychological distress. However, the findings revealed that when psychological flexibility was low, the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was significant. By contrast, we found that for those with high levels of psychological flexibility the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was no longer significant. This pattern of findings was replicated in a separate two-wave survey of 231 internet users (Study 2). Implications of the present research suggest that strategies to increase psychological flexibility may help individuals cope with everyday experiences of ostracism.",
keywords = "ostracism, psychological flexibility, acceptance and commitment therapy, distress",
author = "Daniel Waldeck and Ian Tyndall and Paulo Riva and Nik Chmiel",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "425--432",
journal = "Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - How do we cope with ostracism? Psychological flexibility moderates the relationship between everyday ostracism experiences and psychological distress

AU - Waldeck, Daniel

AU - Tyndall, Ian

AU - Riva, Paulo

AU - Chmiel, Nik

PY - 2017/10

Y1 - 2017/10

N2 - The present paper examined the relationship between everyday experiences of ostracism and psychological distress by focusing on the potential moderating role of psychological flexibility. As expected, data from a two-wave survey of 299 internet users (Study 1) indicated that perceived ostracism was positively related to psychological distress. However, the findings revealed that when psychological flexibility was low, the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was significant. By contrast, we found that for those with high levels of psychological flexibility the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was no longer significant. This pattern of findings was replicated in a separate two-wave survey of 231 internet users (Study 2). Implications of the present research suggest that strategies to increase psychological flexibility may help individuals cope with everyday experiences of ostracism.

AB - The present paper examined the relationship between everyday experiences of ostracism and psychological distress by focusing on the potential moderating role of psychological flexibility. As expected, data from a two-wave survey of 299 internet users (Study 1) indicated that perceived ostracism was positively related to psychological distress. However, the findings revealed that when psychological flexibility was low, the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was significant. By contrast, we found that for those with high levels of psychological flexibility the relationship between perceived ostracism and psychological distress was no longer significant. This pattern of findings was replicated in a separate two-wave survey of 231 internet users (Study 2). Implications of the present research suggest that strategies to increase psychological flexibility may help individuals cope with everyday experiences of ostracism.

KW - ostracism

KW - psychological flexibility

KW - acceptance and commitment therapy

KW - distress

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212144717300819

U2 - 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jcbs.2017.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 6

SP - 425

EP - 432

JO - Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

JF - Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science

IS - 4

ER -