How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System

Vadim Melnicuk; Stewart Birrell; Simon Thompson; Alex Mouzakitis; Paul Jennings

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System

Vadim Melnicuk
, Stewart Birrell
, Simon Thompson
, Alex Mouzakitis
, Paul Jennings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018
Editors	Neville Stanton
Publisher	Springer-Verlag London Ltd
Pages	579-590
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Print)	9783319938844
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53
Publication status	Published - 2019
Externally published	Yes
Event	AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018 - Orlando, United States Duration: 21 Jul 2018 → 25 Jul 2018

Publication series

Name	Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume	786
ISSN (Print)	2194-5357

Conference

Conference	AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018
Country/Territory	United States
City	Orlando
Period	21/07/18 → 25/07/18

Funding

Acknowledgments. The support for this work was provided by Engineering & Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR).

Keywords

Acceptance
Driver State Monitoring
Human factors
Usability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Control and Systems Engineering
General Computer Science

Access to Document

10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

Cite this

Melnicuk, V., Birrell, S., Thompson, S., Mouzakitis, A., & Jennings, P. (2019). How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. In N. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018 (pp. 579-590). (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 786). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. / Melnicuk, Vadim; Birrell, Stewart; Thompson, Simon et al.
Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. ed. / Neville Stanton. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2019. p. 579-590 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 786).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

Melnicuk, V, Birrell, S, Thompson, S, Mouzakitis, A & Jennings, P 2019, How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. in N Stanton (ed.), Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 786, Springer-Verlag London Ltd, pp. 579-590, AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018, Orlando, United States, 21/07/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

Melnicuk V, Birrell S, Thompson S, Mouzakitis A, Jennings P. How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. In Stanton N, editor, Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2019. p. 579-590. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). Epub 2018 Jun 28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

Melnicuk, Vadim ; Birrell, Stewart ; Thompson, Simon et al. / How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. editor / Neville Stanton. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2019. pp. 579-590 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing).

@inproceedings{9f52733dde1b4668b9ba62280464f7ed,

title = "How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers{\textquoteright} Perceptions Towards the System",

abstract = "This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22\% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.",

keywords = "Acceptance, Driver State Monitoring, Human factors, Usability",

author = "Vadim Melnicuk and Stewart Birrell and Simon Thompson and Alex Mouzakitis and Paul Jennings",

year = "2019",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1\_53",

language = "English",

isbn = "9783319938844",

series = "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing",

publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd",

pages = "579--590",

editor = "Neville Stanton",

booktitle = "Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018",

address = "United Kingdom",

note = "AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018 ; Conference date: 21-07-2018 Through 25-07-2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System

AU - Melnicuk, Vadim

AU - Birrell, Stewart

AU - Thompson, Simon

AU - Mouzakitis, Alex

AU - Jennings, Paul

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.

AB - This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.

KW - Acceptance

KW - Driver State Monitoring

KW - Human factors

KW - Usability

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85049685834

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

M3 - Conference proceeding

AN - SCOPUS:85049685834

SN - 9783319938844

T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

SP - 579

EP - 590

BT - Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018

A2 - Stanton, Neville

PB - Springer-Verlag London Ltd

T2 - AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018

Y2 - 21 July 2018 through 25 July 2018

ER -

How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Funding

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this