How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System

Vadim Melnicuk, Stewart Birrell, Simon Thompson, Alex Mouzakitis, Paul Jennings

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Abstract

This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018
EditorsNeville Stanton
PublisherSpringer-Verlag London Ltd
Pages579-590
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783319938844
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
Externally publishedYes
EventAHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018 - Orlando, United States
Duration: 21 Jul 201825 Jul 2018

Publication series

NameAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
Volume786
ISSN (Print)2194-5357

Conference

ConferenceAHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018
CountryUnited States
CityOrlando
Period21/07/1825/07/18

Fingerprint

Monitoring
Model structures

Keywords

  • Acceptance
  • Driver State Monitoring
  • Human factors
  • Usability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Control and Systems Engineering
  • Computer Science(all)

Cite this

Melnicuk, V., Birrell, S., Thompson, S., Mouzakitis, A., & Jennings, P. (2019). How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. In N. Stanton (Ed.), Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018 (pp. 579-590). (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 786). Springer-Verlag London Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. / Melnicuk, Vadim; Birrell, Stewart; Thompson, Simon; Mouzakitis, Alex; Jennings, Paul.

Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. ed. / Neville Stanton. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2019. p. 579-590 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing; Vol. 786).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Melnicuk, V, Birrell, S, Thompson, S, Mouzakitis, A & Jennings, P 2019, How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. in N Stanton (ed.), Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 786, Springer-Verlag London Ltd, pp. 579-590, AHFE International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018, Orlando, United States, 21/07/18. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53
Melnicuk V, Birrell S, Thompson S, Mouzakitis A, Jennings P. How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. In Stanton N, editor, Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. Springer-Verlag London Ltd. 2019. p. 579-590. (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53
Melnicuk, Vadim ; Birrell, Stewart ; Thompson, Simon ; Mouzakitis, Alex ; Jennings, Paul. / How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System. Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018. editor / Neville Stanton. Springer-Verlag London Ltd, 2019. pp. 579-590 (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing).
@inproceedings{9f52733dde1b4668b9ba62280464f7ed,
title = "How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System",
abstract = "This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22{\%} of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.",
keywords = "Acceptance, Driver State Monitoring, Human factors, Usability",
author = "Vadim Melnicuk and Stewart Birrell and Simon Thompson and Alex Mouzakitis and Paul Jennings",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53",
language = "English",
isbn = "9783319938844",
series = "Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag London Ltd",
pages = "579--590",
editor = "Neville Stanton",
booktitle = "Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - How Acceptable Is It to Monitor Driver State? Using the UTAUT Model to Analyse Drivers’ Perceptions Towards the System

AU - Melnicuk, Vadim

AU - Birrell, Stewart

AU - Thompson, Simon

AU - Mouzakitis, Alex

AU - Jennings, Paul

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.

AB - This study aims to identify preliminary acceptance and usability goals of a Driver State Monitoring (DSM) system. To demonstrate willingness within a user group to employ DSM technology for the task it is designed to support, the acceptance of the system was investigated using Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. Furthermore, a list of ten usability goals was composed and ranked by participants. In total, 95 responses were recorded. The sample consisted of participants of mixed gender and age (M = 34.81, SD = 9.32 years). The measurement and structure model of acceptance was appraised using Structural Equation Modelling. Overall, the model accounted for 22% of the variance in intention to use DSM technology. It was found that the Social Influence factor is the only significant predictor of Behaviour Intention to use a DSM system. To conclude, several implications for researchers and developers of DSM systems are suggested.

KW - Acceptance

KW - Driver State Monitoring

KW - Human factors

KW - Usability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049685834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-93885-1_53

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 9783319938844

T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing

SP - 579

EP - 590

BT - Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation - Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conference on Human Factors in Transportation, 2018

A2 - Stanton, Neville

PB - Springer-Verlag London Ltd

ER -