Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Home-based Circuit Training and Community Walking for Intermittent Claudication

  • Alexander Waddell
  • , Francesca Denton
  • , Richard Powell
  • , David R. Broom
  • , Stefan T. Birkett
  • , Gordon McGregor
  • , Amy E. Harwood
    • University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust
    • Manchester Metropolitan University
    • University of Warwick

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    123 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background: Supervised exercise training is recommended for people with peripheral artery disease (PAD), yet it remains underutilized. Home-based exercise programs (HBEPs) are a potential alternative. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of conducting a full scale trial of a 12-week HBEP for people living with symptomatic PAD. 

    Methods: In a randomized feasibility trial, patients with intermittent claudication were allocated to either an HBEP or a nonexercise control. The HBEP group was given a Fitbit to use during a 12-week exercise program comprising of personalized step goals and a resistance-based circuit to be undertaken at home twice weekly. The primary outcome was feasibility, assessed via eligibility, recruitment, attrition, tolerability, and adherence. Acceptability was assessed via semistructured interviews. Secondary analysis was undertaken to determine the feasibility of collecting clinical outcome data. 

    Results: 188 people were screened, 133 were eligible (70.7%), 30 were recruited (22.6%) and one withdrew (3.33%). Mean adherence to the daily step goal was 53.5% (range = 29.8–90.5%), and 58.6% of prescribed circuits were completed of which 56.4% were at the desired intensity. Six adverse events were recorded, 3 of which were related to study involvement. No significant differences were observed in exploratory outcomes. Small clinically important differences were seen in walking speed and pain-free treadmill walking distance which should be confirmed or refuted in a larger trial. 

    Conclusions: The HBEP was feasible and well tolerated, with successful recruitment and minimal attrition. The intervention was acceptable, with walking seen as more enjoyable than circuit exercise. The WALKSTRONG program may be suitable for those who will not, or cannot, take part in supervised exercise outside of the home.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)38-47
    Number of pages10
    JournalAnnals of Vascular Surgery
    Volume105
    Early online date3 Apr 2024
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Aug 2024

    Bibliographical note

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Funder

    Funding for this project was provided as part of a fully funded PhD for AW with the Centre of Physical Activity, Sport & Exercise Sciences, Coventry University.

    Funding

    Funding: Funding for this project was provided as part of a fully funded PhD for AW with the Center for Physical Activity, Sport and Exercise Sciences, Coventry University.

    Funders
    Coventry University

      Keywords

      • Home-based exercise
      • Intermittent claudication
      • Peripheral artery disease

      ASJC Scopus subject areas

      • Surgery
      • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Home-based Circuit Training and Community Walking for Intermittent Claudication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this