TY - JOUR
T1 - Guidance on quantitative pest risk assessment
AU - EFSA Panel on Plant Health
AU - Jeger, Michael
AU - Bragard, Claude
AU - Caffier, David
AU - Candresse, Thierry
AU - Chatzivassiliou, Elisavet
AU - Dehnen-Schmutz, Katharina
AU - Grégoire, Jean Claude
AU - Jaques Miret, Josep Anton
AU - MacLeod, Alan
AU - Navajas Navarro, Maria
AU - Niere, Björn
AU - Parnell, Stephen
AU - Potting, Roel
AU - Rafoss, Trond
AU - Rossi, Vittorio
AU - Urek, Gregor
AU - Van Bruggen, Ariena
AU - Van Der Werf, Wopke
AU - West, Jonathan
AU - Winter, Stephan
AU - Hart, Andy
AU - Schans, Jan
AU - Schrader, Gritta
AU - Suffert, Muriel
AU - Kertész, Virag
AU - Kozelska, Svetla
AU - Mannino, Maria Rosaria
AU - Mosbach-Schulz, Olaf
AU - Pautasso, Marco
AU - Stancanelli, Giuseppe
AU - Tramontini, Sara
AU - Vos, Sybren
AU - Gilioli, Gianni
N1 - © 2018 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalfof European Food Safety Authority.This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License,which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and nomodifications or adaptations are made
PY - 2018/8/3
Y1 - 2018/8/3
N2 - This Guidance describes a two-phase approach for a fit-for-purpose method for the assessment of plant pest risk in the territory of the EU. Phase one consists of pest categorisation to determine whether the pest has the characteristics of a quarantine pest or those of a regulated non-quarantine pest for the area of the EU. Phase two consists of pest risk assessment, which may be requested by the risk managers following the pest categorisation results. This Guidance provides a template for pest categorisation and describes in detail the use of modelling and expert knowledge elicitation to conduct a pest risk assessment. The Guidance provides support and a framework for assessors to provide quantitative estimates, together with associated uncertainties, regarding the entry, establishment, spread and impact of plant pests in the EU. The Guidance allows the effectiveness of risk reducing options (RROs) to be quantitatively assessed as an integral part of the assessment framework. A list of RROs is provided. A two-tiered approach is proposed for the use of expert knowledge elicitation and modelling. Depending on data and resources available and the needs of risk managers, pest entry, establishment, spread and impact steps may be assessed directly, using weight of evidence and quantitative expert judgement (first tier), or they may be elaborated in substeps using quantitative models (second tier). An example of an application of the first tier approach is provided. Guidance is provided on how to derive models of appropriate complexity to conduct a second tier assessment. Each assessment is operationalised using Monte Carlo simulations that can compare scenarios for relevant factors, e.g. with or without RROs. This document provides guidance on how to compare scenarios to draw conclusions on the magnitude of pest risks and the effectiveness of RROs and on how to communicate assessment results.
AB - This Guidance describes a two-phase approach for a fit-for-purpose method for the assessment of plant pest risk in the territory of the EU. Phase one consists of pest categorisation to determine whether the pest has the characteristics of a quarantine pest or those of a regulated non-quarantine pest for the area of the EU. Phase two consists of pest risk assessment, which may be requested by the risk managers following the pest categorisation results. This Guidance provides a template for pest categorisation and describes in detail the use of modelling and expert knowledge elicitation to conduct a pest risk assessment. The Guidance provides support and a framework for assessors to provide quantitative estimates, together with associated uncertainties, regarding the entry, establishment, spread and impact of plant pests in the EU. The Guidance allows the effectiveness of risk reducing options (RROs) to be quantitatively assessed as an integral part of the assessment framework. A list of RROs is provided. A two-tiered approach is proposed for the use of expert knowledge elicitation and modelling. Depending on data and resources available and the needs of risk managers, pest entry, establishment, spread and impact steps may be assessed directly, using weight of evidence and quantitative expert judgement (first tier), or they may be elaborated in substeps using quantitative models (second tier). An example of an application of the first tier approach is provided. Guidance is provided on how to derive models of appropriate complexity to conduct a second tier assessment. Each assessment is operationalised using Monte Carlo simulations that can compare scenarios for relevant factors, e.g. with or without RROs. This document provides guidance on how to compare scenarios to draw conclusions on the magnitude of pest risks and the effectiveness of RROs and on how to communicate assessment results.
KW - expert knowledge elicitation
KW - guidance
KW - model
KW - quantitative pest risk assessment
KW - risk communication
KW - risk reduction option
KW - uncertainty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057976865&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5350
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85057976865
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 16
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 8
M1 - e05350
ER -