Abstract
This article briefly presents two main stances on terrorism’s impact on an economy. It provides arguments for the government’s active counterterrorism policy by presenting consequences of neglecting to respond. Consequently, authorities have to prepare a strategy which may be based on prevention or punishment-deterrence actions. The three phases of response, prevention, recovery and military operations, incur costs which are difficult to asses. Boosted public spending may be financed by expenditure switching, marginally balanced budgets or government borrowing. Nonetheless, all these methods impose threats on fiscal consolidation and evoke crowding out, spin-off and resource mobilization effects on the entire economy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Working Papers in Management, Finance and Economics |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
Bibliographical note
Lis P. (2007). Government’s role in fighting terrorism, MBA Poznan – Atlanta Working Papers in Management, Finance and Economics, No. 1(3)/2007, Poznan, PolandUN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Government’s Role in Fighting Terrorism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS