Government accounting reforms in Sub-Saharan African countries and the selective ignorance of the epistemic community: A competing logics perspective

  • Kelum Nishanta jayasinghe Jayasinghe
  • , Andy Wynne
  • , Pawan Adhikari
  • , Teerooven Soobaroyen
  • , John Malagila
  • , Abdurafiu Noah

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    824 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    The objective of this paper is two-fold. First, it assesses existing local accounting and financial reporting practices in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), focusing on the extent to which recent government financial statements published by ten selected countries adhere to mainstream qualitative features of public sector reporting. Second, it investigates the multiple institutional logics at play in the context of government accounting reforms (GARs) in SSA, involving international organisations, epistemic community members, policy makers and local actors. Data for the study are drawn from a content analysis and disclosure scoring of ten SSA government financial statements, supplemented by forty semi-structured interviews carried out in Nigeria and Tanzania. Our findings demonstrate how the generalised assumptive logics of international organisations, coupled with the market and professional logics of epistemic community members and state logics of local politicians, have led to the marginalisation of ‘good’ existing accounting and financial reporting practice in SSA (as reflected by the extent to which government financial statements adhere to mainstream features of public sector reporting) - while providing the countries with a strong impetus for undertaking a transition towards large-scale GARs involving accrual accounting and IPSASs. The role of the epistemic community in selectively ignoring the positive aspects of local accounting practice is a significant impediment. In this way, members of this epistemic community continue to execute their ‘relational power’ generated through professional knowledge, expertise and elite connections over the local actors, hence upholding the generalised assumptive logics. The paper argues that public accountability and transparency can be strengthened in SSA countries provided there is an ‘intelligent’ application of existing regulations and accounting systems, rather than seeking to merely replace them with externally imposed large-scale GARs.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number102246
    Number of pages22
    JournalCritical Perspectives on Accounting
    Volume78
    Early online date16 Oct 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

    Bibliographical note

    NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in
    Critical Perspectives on Accounting. Changes resulting from the publishing process,
    such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality
    control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have
    been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version
    was subsequently published in Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 78, (2020)DOI:
    10.1016/j.cpa.2020.102246

    © 2020, Elsevier. Licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
    http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

    Keywords

    • Epistemic community
    • Government accounting reforms
    • Institutional logics
    • Sub-Sahara Africa

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Accounting
    • Finance
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Information Systems and Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Government accounting reforms in Sub-Saharan African countries and the selective ignorance of the epistemic community: A competing logics perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this