Governance dynamics in multi-partner R&D alliances: Integrating the control and coordination perspectives

Frano Barbic, Antonio Hidalgo, Raffaella Cagliano

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the dynamics of contractual and relational mechanisms during different phases of multi-partner R&D alliances. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a longitudinal single case study to gain in-depth understanding of which governance mechanisms are best suited for different phases of alliance collaboration. Applying a retrospective strategy for data collection, three rounds of interviews were conducted with representatives of all partner firms. The data were complemented by documentary analysis of both internal documents and publicly available information. Findings: The findings suggest that the use of governance mechanisms in multi-partner alliances depends on the characteristics of alliance phases. Relational governance is most important in the exploration and development phases, while the importance of contractual governance comes to the fore during the development and finalization phases. Despite the predominance of one type of mechanism, the findings support a complementary perspective of governance mechanisms. Research limitations/implications: The results of a single case study offer limited generalizability and should thus be treated with caution. More cross-industry, cross-national studies should be conducted to verify the applicability of the findings to other industries, cultures and geographical contexts. Practical implications: Managers should be aware that different phases of the alliance life cycle have different control and coordination needs, and should rely on different mechanisms during different phases of the alliance. Originality/value: The authors have synthesized insights from various perspectives (transaction cost economics, organization theory, social exchange theory), and developed a multidisciplinary approach to multi-partner collaborations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)405-429
Number of pages25
JournalBaltic Journal of Management
Volume11
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Life cycle
Industry
Managers
Economics
Costs
Alliances
Governance
Governance mechanisms

Keywords

  • Alliance governance mechanisms
  • Contractual mechanisms
  • Governance dynamics
  • Life cycle
  • Multi-partner alliance
  • Relational mechanisms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Marketing
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

Governance dynamics in multi-partner R&D alliances : Integrating the control and coordination perspectives. / Barbic, Frano; Hidalgo, Antonio; Cagliano, Raffaella.

In: Baltic Journal of Management, Vol. 11, No. 4, 2016, p. 405-429.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b1d78b62d41242b5b2b9d5a867b2f2fb,
title = "Governance dynamics in multi-partner R&D alliances: Integrating the control and coordination perspectives",
abstract = "Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the dynamics of contractual and relational mechanisms during different phases of multi-partner R&D alliances. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a longitudinal single case study to gain in-depth understanding of which governance mechanisms are best suited for different phases of alliance collaboration. Applying a retrospective strategy for data collection, three rounds of interviews were conducted with representatives of all partner firms. The data were complemented by documentary analysis of both internal documents and publicly available information. Findings: The findings suggest that the use of governance mechanisms in multi-partner alliances depends on the characteristics of alliance phases. Relational governance is most important in the exploration and development phases, while the importance of contractual governance comes to the fore during the development and finalization phases. Despite the predominance of one type of mechanism, the findings support a complementary perspective of governance mechanisms. Research limitations/implications: The results of a single case study offer limited generalizability and should thus be treated with caution. More cross-industry, cross-national studies should be conducted to verify the applicability of the findings to other industries, cultures and geographical contexts. Practical implications: Managers should be aware that different phases of the alliance life cycle have different control and coordination needs, and should rely on different mechanisms during different phases of the alliance. Originality/value: The authors have synthesized insights from various perspectives (transaction cost economics, organization theory, social exchange theory), and developed a multidisciplinary approach to multi-partner collaborations.",
keywords = "Alliance governance mechanisms, Contractual mechanisms, Governance dynamics, Life cycle, Multi-partner alliance, Relational mechanisms",
author = "Frano Barbic and Antonio Hidalgo and Raffaella Cagliano",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1108/BJM-09-2015-0173",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "405--429",
journal = "Baltic Journal of Management",
issn = "1746-5265",
publisher = "Emerald",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Governance dynamics in multi-partner R&D alliances

T2 - Integrating the control and coordination perspectives

AU - Barbic, Frano

AU - Hidalgo, Antonio

AU - Cagliano, Raffaella

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the dynamics of contractual and relational mechanisms during different phases of multi-partner R&D alliances. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a longitudinal single case study to gain in-depth understanding of which governance mechanisms are best suited for different phases of alliance collaboration. Applying a retrospective strategy for data collection, three rounds of interviews were conducted with representatives of all partner firms. The data were complemented by documentary analysis of both internal documents and publicly available information. Findings: The findings suggest that the use of governance mechanisms in multi-partner alliances depends on the characteristics of alliance phases. Relational governance is most important in the exploration and development phases, while the importance of contractual governance comes to the fore during the development and finalization phases. Despite the predominance of one type of mechanism, the findings support a complementary perspective of governance mechanisms. Research limitations/implications: The results of a single case study offer limited generalizability and should thus be treated with caution. More cross-industry, cross-national studies should be conducted to verify the applicability of the findings to other industries, cultures and geographical contexts. Practical implications: Managers should be aware that different phases of the alliance life cycle have different control and coordination needs, and should rely on different mechanisms during different phases of the alliance. Originality/value: The authors have synthesized insights from various perspectives (transaction cost economics, organization theory, social exchange theory), and developed a multidisciplinary approach to multi-partner collaborations.

AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to examine the dynamics of contractual and relational mechanisms during different phases of multi-partner R&D alliances. Design/methodology/approach: The paper uses a longitudinal single case study to gain in-depth understanding of which governance mechanisms are best suited for different phases of alliance collaboration. Applying a retrospective strategy for data collection, three rounds of interviews were conducted with representatives of all partner firms. The data were complemented by documentary analysis of both internal documents and publicly available information. Findings: The findings suggest that the use of governance mechanisms in multi-partner alliances depends on the characteristics of alliance phases. Relational governance is most important in the exploration and development phases, while the importance of contractual governance comes to the fore during the development and finalization phases. Despite the predominance of one type of mechanism, the findings support a complementary perspective of governance mechanisms. Research limitations/implications: The results of a single case study offer limited generalizability and should thus be treated with caution. More cross-industry, cross-national studies should be conducted to verify the applicability of the findings to other industries, cultures and geographical contexts. Practical implications: Managers should be aware that different phases of the alliance life cycle have different control and coordination needs, and should rely on different mechanisms during different phases of the alliance. Originality/value: The authors have synthesized insights from various perspectives (transaction cost economics, organization theory, social exchange theory), and developed a multidisciplinary approach to multi-partner collaborations.

KW - Alliance governance mechanisms

KW - Contractual mechanisms

KW - Governance dynamics

KW - Life cycle

KW - Multi-partner alliance

KW - Relational mechanisms

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989225684&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/BJM-09-2015-0173

DO - 10.1108/BJM-09-2015-0173

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 405

EP - 429

JO - Baltic Journal of Management

JF - Baltic Journal of Management

SN - 1746-5265

IS - 4

ER -