Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Abstract

This paper engages critically with a set of broadly Marxian-based approaches to the relationship between global politics and processes of capital accumulation. This is then used to inform analysis of the dynamics underlying the multiple but inter-linked crises of food, environment (energy/climate/biodiversity), and finance. The first section assesses the work of Callinicos in his focus on renewed inter-imperialist rivalry, in which the USA is seen as wanting to secure access to, and control over, key resources to secure capital accumulation in intensifying competition with China and other capitalist powers. This approach is compared to the work of Panitch, Gindin, and Kiely in which they revive Kautsky’s notion of ultra-imperialism – here US hegemonic power is assumed to lead other capitalist states in the re-organisation of the global economy. It is argued that, ultimately, both approaches examine only the external relations between the separate but linked logics of capital and global politics. They also neglect the crucial role of the biophysical domain in defining key parameters surrounding capital accumulation.
In the second section, the paper develops an alternative approach to understanding capitalist expansion, its relation to global politics and current crises. By drawing from Rosa Luxembourg’s spatial account of the accumulation of capital and expansion into non-capitalist spaces through on- going processes of primitive accumulation, the structuring conditions of capitalist expansion are conceptualised. Through a critical engagement with William Robinson’s work on the emergence of the transnational state, and that of Jason Moore on ‘world ecology’, the paper develops a conceptualisation of the agency of different class fractions within the inter-state system and their relationship to the crises of food, environment, and finance. In the third section, the paper addresses resistances to these crises. The hegemony of trans-nationalised fractions of capital, often, although not always, led by the USA through ‘ultra-imperialism’, is challenged by sub-hegemonic national capital fractions of some BRICS, notably China and Brazil. But this merely perpetuates the crises of capitalism through policies of neo-developmentalism and neo-extractivism. These are challenged in turn by counter-hegemonic forces seeking food/land/territorial sovereignty. The dynamics of this relationship between hegemonic, sub-hegemonic and counter-hegemonic forces – between global politics, the state, and social movements – are examined, particularly in relation to Latin America.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationGlobal governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges
Place of PublicationThe Hague
PublisherInternational Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands
Number of pages20
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2016
EventGlobal governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges: An international colloquium - The Hague, Netherlands
Duration: 4 Feb 20165 Feb 2016

Publication series

NameInitiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium
PublisherISS, The Hague

Conference

ConferenceGlobal governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges
CountryNetherlands
CityThe Hague
Period4/02/165/02/16

Fingerprint

environment crisis
capitalist society
capital accumulation
politics
imperialism
food
finance
territorial sovereignty
China
reorganization
Social Movements
hegemony
biodiversity
ecology
neglect
Latin America
Brazil
climate
energy
economy

Cite this

Tilzey, M. (2016). Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges. In Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges [Colloquium Paper No.14] (Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium). The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands.

Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance : Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges. / Tilzey, Mark.

Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges. The Hague : International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands, 2016. Colloquium Paper No.14 (Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Tilzey, M 2016, Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges. in Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges., Colloquium Paper No.14, Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium, International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands, The Hague, Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges, The Hague, Netherlands, 4/02/16.
Tilzey M. Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges. In Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges. The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands. 2016. Colloquium Paper No.14. (Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium).
Tilzey, Mark. / Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance : Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges. Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges. The Hague : International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands, 2016. (Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium).
@inproceedings{694bdfd26b7d46bea8fec797c00fcdb0,
title = "Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance: Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges",
abstract = "This paper engages critically with a set of broadly Marxian-based approaches to the relationship between global politics and processes of capital accumulation. This is then used to inform analysis of the dynamics underlying the multiple but inter-linked crises of food, environment (energy/climate/biodiversity), and finance. The first section assesses the work of Callinicos in his focus on renewed inter-imperialist rivalry, in which the USA is seen as wanting to secure access to, and control over, key resources to secure capital accumulation in intensifying competition with China and other capitalist powers. This approach is compared to the work of Panitch, Gindin, and Kiely in which they revive Kautsky’s notion of ultra-imperialism – here US hegemonic power is assumed to lead other capitalist states in the re-organisation of the global economy. It is argued that, ultimately, both approaches examine only the external relations between the separate but linked logics of capital and global politics. They also neglect the crucial role of the biophysical domain in defining key parameters surrounding capital accumulation.In the second section, the paper develops an alternative approach to understanding capitalist expansion, its relation to global politics and current crises. By drawing from Rosa Luxembourg’s spatial account of the accumulation of capital and expansion into non-capitalist spaces through on- going processes of primitive accumulation, the structuring conditions of capitalist expansion are conceptualised. Through a critical engagement with William Robinson’s work on the emergence of the transnational state, and that of Jason Moore on ‘world ecology’, the paper develops a conceptualisation of the agency of different class fractions within the inter-state system and their relationship to the crises of food, environment, and finance. In the third section, the paper addresses resistances to these crises. The hegemony of trans-nationalised fractions of capital, often, although not always, led by the USA through ‘ultra-imperialism’, is challenged by sub-hegemonic national capital fractions of some BRICS, notably China and Brazil. But this merely perpetuates the crises of capitalism through policies of neo-developmentalism and neo-extractivism. These are challenged in turn by counter-hegemonic forces seeking food/land/territorial sovereignty. The dynamics of this relationship between hegemonic, sub-hegemonic and counter-hegemonic forces – between global politics, the state, and social movements – are examined, particularly in relation to Latin America.",
author = "Mark Tilzey",
year = "2016",
month = "2",
language = "English",
series = "Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium",
publisher = "International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands",
booktitle = "Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Global Politics, Capitalism, Socio-Ecological Crisis, and Resistance

T2 - Exploring the Linkages and the Challenges

AU - Tilzey, Mark

PY - 2016/2

Y1 - 2016/2

N2 - This paper engages critically with a set of broadly Marxian-based approaches to the relationship between global politics and processes of capital accumulation. This is then used to inform analysis of the dynamics underlying the multiple but inter-linked crises of food, environment (energy/climate/biodiversity), and finance. The first section assesses the work of Callinicos in his focus on renewed inter-imperialist rivalry, in which the USA is seen as wanting to secure access to, and control over, key resources to secure capital accumulation in intensifying competition with China and other capitalist powers. This approach is compared to the work of Panitch, Gindin, and Kiely in which they revive Kautsky’s notion of ultra-imperialism – here US hegemonic power is assumed to lead other capitalist states in the re-organisation of the global economy. It is argued that, ultimately, both approaches examine only the external relations between the separate but linked logics of capital and global politics. They also neglect the crucial role of the biophysical domain in defining key parameters surrounding capital accumulation.In the second section, the paper develops an alternative approach to understanding capitalist expansion, its relation to global politics and current crises. By drawing from Rosa Luxembourg’s spatial account of the accumulation of capital and expansion into non-capitalist spaces through on- going processes of primitive accumulation, the structuring conditions of capitalist expansion are conceptualised. Through a critical engagement with William Robinson’s work on the emergence of the transnational state, and that of Jason Moore on ‘world ecology’, the paper develops a conceptualisation of the agency of different class fractions within the inter-state system and their relationship to the crises of food, environment, and finance. In the third section, the paper addresses resistances to these crises. The hegemony of trans-nationalised fractions of capital, often, although not always, led by the USA through ‘ultra-imperialism’, is challenged by sub-hegemonic national capital fractions of some BRICS, notably China and Brazil. But this merely perpetuates the crises of capitalism through policies of neo-developmentalism and neo-extractivism. These are challenged in turn by counter-hegemonic forces seeking food/land/territorial sovereignty. The dynamics of this relationship between hegemonic, sub-hegemonic and counter-hegemonic forces – between global politics, the state, and social movements – are examined, particularly in relation to Latin America.

AB - This paper engages critically with a set of broadly Marxian-based approaches to the relationship between global politics and processes of capital accumulation. This is then used to inform analysis of the dynamics underlying the multiple but inter-linked crises of food, environment (energy/climate/biodiversity), and finance. The first section assesses the work of Callinicos in his focus on renewed inter-imperialist rivalry, in which the USA is seen as wanting to secure access to, and control over, key resources to secure capital accumulation in intensifying competition with China and other capitalist powers. This approach is compared to the work of Panitch, Gindin, and Kiely in which they revive Kautsky’s notion of ultra-imperialism – here US hegemonic power is assumed to lead other capitalist states in the re-organisation of the global economy. It is argued that, ultimately, both approaches examine only the external relations between the separate but linked logics of capital and global politics. They also neglect the crucial role of the biophysical domain in defining key parameters surrounding capital accumulation.In the second section, the paper develops an alternative approach to understanding capitalist expansion, its relation to global politics and current crises. By drawing from Rosa Luxembourg’s spatial account of the accumulation of capital and expansion into non-capitalist spaces through on- going processes of primitive accumulation, the structuring conditions of capitalist expansion are conceptualised. Through a critical engagement with William Robinson’s work on the emergence of the transnational state, and that of Jason Moore on ‘world ecology’, the paper develops a conceptualisation of the agency of different class fractions within the inter-state system and their relationship to the crises of food, environment, and finance. In the third section, the paper addresses resistances to these crises. The hegemony of trans-nationalised fractions of capital, often, although not always, led by the USA through ‘ultra-imperialism’, is challenged by sub-hegemonic national capital fractions of some BRICS, notably China and Brazil. But this merely perpetuates the crises of capitalism through policies of neo-developmentalism and neo-extractivism. These are challenged in turn by counter-hegemonic forces seeking food/land/territorial sovereignty. The dynamics of this relationship between hegemonic, sub-hegemonic and counter-hegemonic forces – between global politics, the state, and social movements – are examined, particularly in relation to Latin America.

M3 - Conference proceeding

T3 - Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies International Colloquium

BT - Global governance/politics, climate justice & agrarian/social justice: linkages and challenges

PB - International Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, Netherlands

CY - The Hague

ER -