Glass slippers and glass cliffs: Fitting in and falling off

Nithya Krishnan, Deborah Biggerstaff , Ala Szczepura, Monica Dolton, Sondra Livingston, John Hattersley , Josette Eris , Nancy Ascher , Robert Higgins, Hillary Braun , Kathryn Wood , Neil Raymond

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A glass ceiling effect exists for women in male-dominated professions. Recent studies also show a glass-cliff effect where senior women can more easily fall from positions of leadership. Transplantation remains a male-dominated specialty. This study investigated gender and the perception of adverse clinical incidents in transplantation. METHODS: Prospective randomised web-based survey involving five clinical scenarios presenting two versions of episodes with errors or mistakes, with either a male or female as a randomly named protagonist (Set1 and Set2). To address unconscious bias, the study was described as examining actions following clinical adverse incidents in transplantation. Each scenario was followed by 2 closed questions: (1) clinical performance rating and (2) selection of action required. Reasoning was invited (open-text comments). Responses were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one invitees responded; 134 completed questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in responses between sets for performance ratings or recommended actions. However, for "first solo laparoscopic surgery" scenario, there was some indication that "No Action" was more likely if surgeon was male (P = 0.056). Male responses rated female performance as significantly worse (P = 0.035) for the laboratory-based scenario. One hundred two participants provided open-text comments. Thematic analysis identified 7 themes. Acceptable levels of risk theme demonstrated engendered leadership beliefs, that is, when clinical judgment proved incorrect, males described as forceful but females as needing support. In cases where things went wrong, respondents were more likely to comment females should not have decided to proceed. CONCLUSIONS: While gender may no longer be an overt issue in perceived performance of senior staff in transplantation, respondents' use of language and their choice of words display elements of unconscious (covert) engendered views.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1486-1493
Number of pages8
JournalTransplantation
Volume103
Issue number7
Early online date18 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Accidental Falls
Glass
scenario
Transplantation
performance
incident
male profession
rating
leadership
gender
quantitative method
qualitative method
surgery
indication
staff
Laparoscopy
questionnaire
Language
trend
language

Keywords

  • Leadership, gender identity, use of language, glass cliff, women physicians, stereotyping

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Professions(all)
  • Medicine(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Krishnan, N., Biggerstaff , D., Szczepura, A., Dolton, M., Livingston, S., Hattersley , J., ... Raymond , N. (2019). Glass slippers and glass cliffs: Fitting in and falling off. Transplantation, 103(7), 1486-1493. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002603

Glass slippers and glass cliffs : Fitting in and falling off. / Krishnan, Nithya; Biggerstaff , Deborah; Szczepura, Ala; Dolton, Monica; Livingston, Sondra; Hattersley , John; Eris , Josette; Ascher , Nancy; Higgins, Robert; Braun , Hillary; Wood , Kathryn; Raymond , Neil.

In: Transplantation, Vol. 103, No. 7, 01.07.2019, p. 1486-1493.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Krishnan, N, Biggerstaff , D, Szczepura, A, Dolton, M, Livingston, S, Hattersley , J, Eris , J, Ascher , N, Higgins, R, Braun , H, Wood , K & Raymond , N 2019, 'Glass slippers and glass cliffs: Fitting in and falling off' Transplantation, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 1486-1493. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002603
Krishnan N, Biggerstaff D, Szczepura A, Dolton M, Livingston S, Hattersley J et al. Glass slippers and glass cliffs: Fitting in and falling off. Transplantation. 2019 Jul 1;103(7):1486-1493. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000002603
Krishnan, Nithya ; Biggerstaff , Deborah ; Szczepura, Ala ; Dolton, Monica ; Livingston, Sondra ; Hattersley , John ; Eris , Josette ; Ascher , Nancy ; Higgins, Robert ; Braun , Hillary ; Wood , Kathryn ; Raymond , Neil. / Glass slippers and glass cliffs : Fitting in and falling off. In: Transplantation. 2019 ; Vol. 103, No. 7. pp. 1486-1493.
@article{6ecf0e51a8af4d5f8198c0914b31ae63,
title = "Glass slippers and glass cliffs: Fitting in and falling off",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: A glass ceiling effect exists for women in male-dominated professions. Recent studies also show a glass-cliff effect where senior women can more easily fall from positions of leadership. Transplantation remains a male-dominated specialty. This study investigated gender and the perception of adverse clinical incidents in transplantation. METHODS: Prospective randomised web-based survey involving five clinical scenarios presenting two versions of episodes with errors or mistakes, with either a male or female as a randomly named protagonist (Set1 and Set2). To address unconscious bias, the study was described as examining actions following clinical adverse incidents in transplantation. Each scenario was followed by 2 closed questions: (1) clinical performance rating and (2) selection of action required. Reasoning was invited (open-text comments). Responses were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one invitees responded; 134 completed questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in responses between sets for performance ratings or recommended actions. However, for {"}first solo laparoscopic surgery{"} scenario, there was some indication that {"}No Action{"} was more likely if surgeon was male (P = 0.056). Male responses rated female performance as significantly worse (P = 0.035) for the laboratory-based scenario. One hundred two participants provided open-text comments. Thematic analysis identified 7 themes. Acceptable levels of risk theme demonstrated engendered leadership beliefs, that is, when clinical judgment proved incorrect, males described as forceful but females as needing support. In cases where things went wrong, respondents were more likely to comment females should not have decided to proceed. CONCLUSIONS: While gender may no longer be an overt issue in perceived performance of senior staff in transplantation, respondents' use of language and their choice of words display elements of unconscious (covert) engendered views.",
keywords = "Leadership, gender identity, use of language, glass cliff, women physicians, stereotyping",
author = "Nithya Krishnan and Deborah Biggerstaff and Ala Szczepura and Monica Dolton and Sondra Livingston and John Hattersley and Josette Eris and Nancy Ascher and Robert Higgins and Hillary Braun and Kathryn Wood and Neil Raymond",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/TP.0000000000002603",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "1486--1493",
journal = "Transplantation",
issn = "0041-1337",
publisher = "Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Glass slippers and glass cliffs

T2 - Fitting in and falling off

AU - Krishnan, Nithya

AU - Biggerstaff , Deborah

AU - Szczepura, Ala

AU - Dolton, Monica

AU - Livingston, Sondra

AU - Hattersley , John

AU - Eris , Josette

AU - Ascher , Nancy

AU - Higgins, Robert

AU - Braun , Hillary

AU - Wood , Kathryn

AU - Raymond , Neil

PY - 2019/7/1

Y1 - 2019/7/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: A glass ceiling effect exists for women in male-dominated professions. Recent studies also show a glass-cliff effect where senior women can more easily fall from positions of leadership. Transplantation remains a male-dominated specialty. This study investigated gender and the perception of adverse clinical incidents in transplantation. METHODS: Prospective randomised web-based survey involving five clinical scenarios presenting two versions of episodes with errors or mistakes, with either a male or female as a randomly named protagonist (Set1 and Set2). To address unconscious bias, the study was described as examining actions following clinical adverse incidents in transplantation. Each scenario was followed by 2 closed questions: (1) clinical performance rating and (2) selection of action required. Reasoning was invited (open-text comments). Responses were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one invitees responded; 134 completed questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in responses between sets for performance ratings or recommended actions. However, for "first solo laparoscopic surgery" scenario, there was some indication that "No Action" was more likely if surgeon was male (P = 0.056). Male responses rated female performance as significantly worse (P = 0.035) for the laboratory-based scenario. One hundred two participants provided open-text comments. Thematic analysis identified 7 themes. Acceptable levels of risk theme demonstrated engendered leadership beliefs, that is, when clinical judgment proved incorrect, males described as forceful but females as needing support. In cases where things went wrong, respondents were more likely to comment females should not have decided to proceed. CONCLUSIONS: While gender may no longer be an overt issue in perceived performance of senior staff in transplantation, respondents' use of language and their choice of words display elements of unconscious (covert) engendered views.

AB - BACKGROUND: A glass ceiling effect exists for women in male-dominated professions. Recent studies also show a glass-cliff effect where senior women can more easily fall from positions of leadership. Transplantation remains a male-dominated specialty. This study investigated gender and the perception of adverse clinical incidents in transplantation. METHODS: Prospective randomised web-based survey involving five clinical scenarios presenting two versions of episodes with errors or mistakes, with either a male or female as a randomly named protagonist (Set1 and Set2). To address unconscious bias, the study was described as examining actions following clinical adverse incidents in transplantation. Each scenario was followed by 2 closed questions: (1) clinical performance rating and (2) selection of action required. Reasoning was invited (open-text comments). Responses were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one invitees responded; 134 completed questionnaires. There were no statistically significant differences (P > 0.05) in responses between sets for performance ratings or recommended actions. However, for "first solo laparoscopic surgery" scenario, there was some indication that "No Action" was more likely if surgeon was male (P = 0.056). Male responses rated female performance as significantly worse (P = 0.035) for the laboratory-based scenario. One hundred two participants provided open-text comments. Thematic analysis identified 7 themes. Acceptable levels of risk theme demonstrated engendered leadership beliefs, that is, when clinical judgment proved incorrect, males described as forceful but females as needing support. In cases where things went wrong, respondents were more likely to comment females should not have decided to proceed. CONCLUSIONS: While gender may no longer be an overt issue in perceived performance of senior staff in transplantation, respondents' use of language and their choice of words display elements of unconscious (covert) engendered views.

KW - Leadership, gender identity, use of language, glass cliff, women physicians, stereotyping

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85068845213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002603

DO - 10.1097/TP.0000000000002603

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 1486

EP - 1493

JO - Transplantation

JF - Transplantation

SN - 0041-1337

IS - 7

ER -