Gasoline Particulate Filter wall permeability testing

Svetlana Aleksandrova, Jonathan Saul, Humberto Medina, Oscar Garcia-Afonso, Chunxing Lin, Jose Martin Herreros, Mark Bevan, Stephen Benjamin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)
44 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

With the introduction of particulate matter emissions regulations for
gasoline engines, most car manufacturers are considering using
Gasoline Particulate Filters (GPF). Although very similar to Diesel
Particulate Filters (DPF), GPFs operate at higher temperatures and
generally have thinner monolith walls. In order to estimate the
pressure loss through the filter, filter wall permeability is needed.
This presents a number of challenges since wall losses cannot be
efficiently isolated from other losses in a full scale filter or filter core.
Thin wall wafers have been used for DPF characterisation. However,
GPF wafers are generally thinner, which makes the testing less
straightforward. This paper presents a novel effective methodology
for estimation of GPF wall permeability using thin wafers cut from
the filter monolith. Both cold and hot flow permeability can be
estimated, which allows to account for the change of apparent
permeability due to the slip effect. The flow through the wafer is also
modelled numerically to assess the effect of the uneven wafer surface
resulting from wafer preparation method. A technique for calculating
corrected permeability is suggested which is estimated to provide
values within 5% of the "nominal" value. Combining experimental
results with the applied correction, consistent permeability values
have been obtained for seven wafer samples. Maximum variation in
the permeability values was 10%, with a standard error of ±2.5% of
the mean. Being able to assess filter wall permeability from a simple
cold flow pressure testing procedure will allow development of more
efficient flow and pressure loss models for Gasoline Particulate
Filters, which in turn will facilitate design of efficient aftertreatment
systems with lower back pressure.
Original languageEnglish
Article numberSAE 03-11-05-0039
Pages (from-to)571-584
Number of pages14
JournalSAE International Journal of Engines
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Oct 2018

Bibliographical note

Copyright © and Moral Rights are retained by the author(s) and/ or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This item cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder(s). The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.
This document is the author’s post-print version, incorporating any revisions agreed during the peer-review process. Some differences between the published version and this version may remain and you are advised to consult the published version if you wish to cite from it.

Keywords

  • Aftertreatment
  • Particulate Matter
  • Particulate Filter
  • GPF
  • DPF
  • Pressure Loss

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Automotive Engineering
  • Pollution

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Gasoline Particulate Filter wall permeability testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

1 Citation (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)
  • Turbulent flow pressure losses in gasoline particulate filters

    Aleksandrova, S., Saul, J., Prantoni, M., Medina, H., Garcia-Afonso, O., Bevan, M. & Benjamin, S., 19 Aug 2019, In : SAE International Journal of Engines. 12, 4, p. 455-470 16 p., 03-12-04-0030.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Open Access
    File
  • 3 Citations (Scopus)
    40 Downloads (Pure)

    Cite this