Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection

Ritchie Daniel, Hongming Xu, Chongming Wang, Dave Richardson, Shijin Shuai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To meet the needs of fuel security and combat the growing concerns of CO2emissions, the automotive industry is seeking solutions through biofuels. Traditionally, when supplying biofuel blends to the combustion chamber, the blend is mixed externally prior to its injection in one location. This location occurs either before the cylinder (port-fuel injection, PFI), or directly into the cylinder (direct-injection, DI). However, the use of dual-injection allows the in-cylinder blending of two fuels at any blend ratio, when combining the two locations (PFI and DI). This injection strategy offers increased flexibility as the blend ratio can be changed instantaneously according to engine speed and load demand and fuel availability. Previous work by the authors has reported the improved combustion performance of dual-injection with 25% blends (in gasoline) of a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). This current investigation extends the analysis to include the gaseous emissions of various DMF blends (25%, 50% and 75%) from 3.5bar to 8.5bar IMEP and the particulate matter (PM) emissions of similar fraction ethanol blends at a selected condition of 5.5bar IMEP. Compared to DI, dual-injection offers reduced CO and CO2emissions and comparable HC emissions. The mean PM diameter is decreased and the accumulation mode particles are negligible compared to DI. However, the implication of the higher combustion pressures is an increase in NOxdue to reduced charge-cooling. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)252-261
Number of pages10
JournalApplied Energy
Volume105
Early online date4 Feb 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2013

Fingerprint

Direct injection
Biofuels
biofuel
particulate matter
Engine cylinders
Fuel injection
combustion
Combustion chambers
Gas emissions
Automotive industry
Gasoline
Ethanol
Availability
ethanol
Engines
Cooling
engine
cooling
industry

Keywords

  • 2,5-Dimethylfuran
  • Direct-injection
  • Dual-injection
  • Ethanol
  • Particulate Matter

Cite this

Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection. / Daniel, Ritchie; Xu, Hongming; Wang, Chongming; Richardson, Dave; Shuai, Shijin.

In: Applied Energy, Vol. 105, 05.2013, p. 252-261.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Daniel, Ritchie ; Xu, Hongming ; Wang, Chongming ; Richardson, Dave ; Shuai, Shijin. / Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection. In: Applied Energy. 2013 ; Vol. 105. pp. 252-261.
@article{fba3e355c53d4d98be52ab5b158113fa,
title = "Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection",
abstract = "To meet the needs of fuel security and combat the growing concerns of CO2emissions, the automotive industry is seeking solutions through biofuels. Traditionally, when supplying biofuel blends to the combustion chamber, the blend is mixed externally prior to its injection in one location. This location occurs either before the cylinder (port-fuel injection, PFI), or directly into the cylinder (direct-injection, DI). However, the use of dual-injection allows the in-cylinder blending of two fuels at any blend ratio, when combining the two locations (PFI and DI). This injection strategy offers increased flexibility as the blend ratio can be changed instantaneously according to engine speed and load demand and fuel availability. Previous work by the authors has reported the improved combustion performance of dual-injection with 25{\%} blends (in gasoline) of a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). This current investigation extends the analysis to include the gaseous emissions of various DMF blends (25{\%}, 50{\%} and 75{\%}) from 3.5bar to 8.5bar IMEP and the particulate matter (PM) emissions of similar fraction ethanol blends at a selected condition of 5.5bar IMEP. Compared to DI, dual-injection offers reduced CO and CO2emissions and comparable HC emissions. The mean PM diameter is decreased and the accumulation mode particles are negligible compared to DI. However, the implication of the higher combustion pressures is an increase in NOxdue to reduced charge-cooling. {\circledC} 2012 Elsevier Ltd.",
keywords = "2,5-Dimethylfuran, Direct-injection, Dual-injection, Ethanol, Particulate Matter",
author = "Ritchie Daniel and Hongming Xu and Chongming Wang and Dave Richardson and Shijin Shuai",
year = "2013",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.020",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
pages = "252--261",
journal = "Applied Energy",
issn = "0306-2619",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Gaseous and particulate matter emissions of biofuel blends in dual-injection compared to direct-injection and port injection

AU - Daniel, Ritchie

AU - Xu, Hongming

AU - Wang, Chongming

AU - Richardson, Dave

AU - Shuai, Shijin

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - To meet the needs of fuel security and combat the growing concerns of CO2emissions, the automotive industry is seeking solutions through biofuels. Traditionally, when supplying biofuel blends to the combustion chamber, the blend is mixed externally prior to its injection in one location. This location occurs either before the cylinder (port-fuel injection, PFI), or directly into the cylinder (direct-injection, DI). However, the use of dual-injection allows the in-cylinder blending of two fuels at any blend ratio, when combining the two locations (PFI and DI). This injection strategy offers increased flexibility as the blend ratio can be changed instantaneously according to engine speed and load demand and fuel availability. Previous work by the authors has reported the improved combustion performance of dual-injection with 25% blends (in gasoline) of a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). This current investigation extends the analysis to include the gaseous emissions of various DMF blends (25%, 50% and 75%) from 3.5bar to 8.5bar IMEP and the particulate matter (PM) emissions of similar fraction ethanol blends at a selected condition of 5.5bar IMEP. Compared to DI, dual-injection offers reduced CO and CO2emissions and comparable HC emissions. The mean PM diameter is decreased and the accumulation mode particles are negligible compared to DI. However, the implication of the higher combustion pressures is an increase in NOxdue to reduced charge-cooling. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - To meet the needs of fuel security and combat the growing concerns of CO2emissions, the automotive industry is seeking solutions through biofuels. Traditionally, when supplying biofuel blends to the combustion chamber, the blend is mixed externally prior to its injection in one location. This location occurs either before the cylinder (port-fuel injection, PFI), or directly into the cylinder (direct-injection, DI). However, the use of dual-injection allows the in-cylinder blending of two fuels at any blend ratio, when combining the two locations (PFI and DI). This injection strategy offers increased flexibility as the blend ratio can be changed instantaneously according to engine speed and load demand and fuel availability. Previous work by the authors has reported the improved combustion performance of dual-injection with 25% blends (in gasoline) of a new biofuel candidate: 2,5-dimethylfuran (DMF). This current investigation extends the analysis to include the gaseous emissions of various DMF blends (25%, 50% and 75%) from 3.5bar to 8.5bar IMEP and the particulate matter (PM) emissions of similar fraction ethanol blends at a selected condition of 5.5bar IMEP. Compared to DI, dual-injection offers reduced CO and CO2emissions and comparable HC emissions. The mean PM diameter is decreased and the accumulation mode particles are negligible compared to DI. However, the implication of the higher combustion pressures is an increase in NOxdue to reduced charge-cooling. © 2012 Elsevier Ltd.

KW - 2,5-Dimethylfuran

KW - Direct-injection

KW - Dual-injection

KW - Ethanol

KW - Particulate Matter

U2 - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.020

DO - 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.11.020

M3 - Article

VL - 105

SP - 252

EP - 261

JO - Applied Energy

JF - Applied Energy

SN - 0306-2619

ER -