From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Upon becoming Prime Minister, Theresa May installed industrial strategy as one of the principal planks of her economic policy. May’s embrace of industrial strategy, with its tacit acceptance of a positive role for the state in steering and coordinating economic activity, initially appears to be a decisive break with an era dating back to Margaret Thatcher in which government intervention was regarded as heresy. Whilst there are doubtless novel features, this article argues that continuity is the overriding theme of May’s industrial strategy . First, despite their reluctance to confess it, like every UK government over the past 40 years May is proposing to intervene selectively to ‘pick winners’. Moreover, the strategy envisages extending assistance to industries in receipt of substantial government resources since the 1970s. Likewise, the backing anticipated for industries identified in May’s strategy is dwarfed by those that are not, most notably the financial services sector. Far from radically rebalancing the structure of the UK economy May’s strategy seems destined to entrench the deindustrialisation with which its governments have grappled for almost a century.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)631-639
JournalThe Political Quarterly
Volume89
Issue number4
Early online date26 Sep 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

de-industrialization
industry
financial service
tertiary sector
Economic Policy
minister
continuity
assistance
acceptance
economy
resources
economics

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Silverwood, J & Woodward, R 2018, 'From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy' The Political Quarterly, vol. (In-Press), pp. (In-Press), which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12581
This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

Keywords

  • Industrial Strategy
  • Industrial policy
  • Margaret Thatcher
  • Theresa May

Cite this

From Maggie to May : Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy. / Silverwood, James; Woodward, Richard.

In: The Political Quarterly, Vol. 89, No. 4, 20.11.2018, p. 631-639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{7c0c87cf9f9a45ae905a5055f95fce9c,
title = "From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy",
abstract = "Upon becoming Prime Minister, Theresa May installed industrial strategy as one of the principal planks of her economic policy. May’s embrace of industrial strategy, with its tacit acceptance of a positive role for the state in steering and coordinating economic activity, initially appears to be a decisive break with an era dating back to Margaret Thatcher in which government intervention was regarded as heresy. Whilst there are doubtless novel features, this article argues that continuity is the overriding theme of May’s industrial strategy . First, despite their reluctance to confess it, like every UK government over the past 40 years May is proposing to intervene selectively to ‘pick winners’. Moreover, the strategy envisages extending assistance to industries in receipt of substantial government resources since the 1970s. Likewise, the backing anticipated for industries identified in May’s strategy is dwarfed by those that are not, most notably the financial services sector. Far from radically rebalancing the structure of the UK economy May’s strategy seems destined to entrench the deindustrialisation with which its governments have grappled for almost a century.",
keywords = "Industrial Strategy, Industrial policy, Margaret Thatcher, Theresa May",
author = "James Silverwood and Richard Woodward",
note = "This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Silverwood, J & Woodward, R 2018, 'From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy' The Political Quarterly, vol. (In-Press), pp. (In-Press), which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12581 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1111/1467-923X.12581",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "631--639",
journal = "Political Quarterly",
issn = "0032-3179",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Maggie to May

T2 - Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy

AU - Silverwood, James

AU - Woodward, Richard

N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Silverwood, J & Woodward, R 2018, 'From Maggie to May: Forty Years of (De)Industrialisation Strategy' The Political Quarterly, vol. (In-Press), pp. (In-Press), which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12581 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Self-Archiving.

PY - 2018/11/20

Y1 - 2018/11/20

N2 - Upon becoming Prime Minister, Theresa May installed industrial strategy as one of the principal planks of her economic policy. May’s embrace of industrial strategy, with its tacit acceptance of a positive role for the state in steering and coordinating economic activity, initially appears to be a decisive break with an era dating back to Margaret Thatcher in which government intervention was regarded as heresy. Whilst there are doubtless novel features, this article argues that continuity is the overriding theme of May’s industrial strategy . First, despite their reluctance to confess it, like every UK government over the past 40 years May is proposing to intervene selectively to ‘pick winners’. Moreover, the strategy envisages extending assistance to industries in receipt of substantial government resources since the 1970s. Likewise, the backing anticipated for industries identified in May’s strategy is dwarfed by those that are not, most notably the financial services sector. Far from radically rebalancing the structure of the UK economy May’s strategy seems destined to entrench the deindustrialisation with which its governments have grappled for almost a century.

AB - Upon becoming Prime Minister, Theresa May installed industrial strategy as one of the principal planks of her economic policy. May’s embrace of industrial strategy, with its tacit acceptance of a positive role for the state in steering and coordinating economic activity, initially appears to be a decisive break with an era dating back to Margaret Thatcher in which government intervention was regarded as heresy. Whilst there are doubtless novel features, this article argues that continuity is the overriding theme of May’s industrial strategy . First, despite their reluctance to confess it, like every UK government over the past 40 years May is proposing to intervene selectively to ‘pick winners’. Moreover, the strategy envisages extending assistance to industries in receipt of substantial government resources since the 1970s. Likewise, the backing anticipated for industries identified in May’s strategy is dwarfed by those that are not, most notably the financial services sector. Far from radically rebalancing the structure of the UK economy May’s strategy seems destined to entrench the deindustrialisation with which its governments have grappled for almost a century.

KW - Industrial Strategy

KW - Industrial policy

KW - Margaret Thatcher

KW - Theresa May

U2 - 10.1111/1467-923X.12581

DO - 10.1111/1467-923X.12581

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 631

EP - 639

JO - Political Quarterly

JF - Political Quarterly

SN - 0032-3179

IS - 4

ER -