Formulaic sequences in native and non-native argumentative writing in German

S. Jaworska, Cédric Krummes, A. Ensslin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)


The aim of this paper is to contribute to learner corpus research into formulaic language in native and non-native German. To this effect, a corpus of argumentative essays written by advanced British students of German (WHiG) was compared with a corpus of argumentative essays written by German native speakers (Falko-L1). A corpus-driven analysis reveals a larger number of 3-grams in WHiG than in Falko-L1, which suggests that British advanced learners of German are more likely to use formulaic language in argumentative writing than their native-speaker counterparts. Secondly, by classifying the formulaic sequences according to their functions, this study finds that native speakers of German prefer discourse-structuring devices to stance expressions, whilst British advanced learners display the opposite preferences. Thirdly, the results show that learners of German make greater use of macro-discourse-structuring devices and cautious language, whereas native speakers favour micro-discourse structuring devices and tend to use more direct language. © John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)500-525
JournalInternational Journal of Corpus Linguistics
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

The full text is available from


  • n-grams
  • argumentative writing
  • German native speakers
  • formulaic language
  • advanced British learners of German


Dive into the research topics of 'Formulaic sequences in native and non-native argumentative writing in German'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this