Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana: The Elephant in the Room

Maktoba Omar Saad, Mavis Gutu, Constantia Anastasiadou, Collins Osei

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Purpose: In Sub-Saharan Africa, FDI performance is considerably different between Zimbabwe and its neighbouring countries. This chapter examines FDI determinants for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with particular emphasis on the comparison between Zimbabwe and Botswana.Design/methodology/approach: Using secondary data analysis, the study examined why Botswana was attracting more FDI than Zimbabwe in the period 2002-2012.Findings: Botswana is attractive due to the stability of the political and legal environments, high human capital and governance that promotes technological adoption. In contrast, Zimbabwe’s political instability and the government’s unwillingness to address the challenges the country is facing impedes FDI attraction and retention.What is original/value of the chapter: The chapter is of value to policy makers, as they plan and implement policies and foreign investors, in understanding how different determinants impact on location attractiveness.Research limitations: The study was based on secondary data analysis. Finding comparable data outside the study period was challenging.Practical implications: Zimbabwe needs to address the impact of its policy formulation and implementation on brand image and FDI attraction.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationManaging Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa
Pages167-194
Number of pages28
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Foreign direct investment
Zimbabwe
Botswana
Sub-Saharan Africa
Secondary data
Attraction
Government
Foreign investors
Design methodology
Politicians
Legal environment
Attractiveness
Technological adoption
Political environment
Political instability
Human capital
FDI determinants
Governance
Brand image

Keywords

  • FDI
  • Zimbabwe
  • Botswana
  • Sub-Saharan
  • Africa
  • branding
  • image
  • spillovers

Cite this

Omar Saad, M., Gutu, M., Anastasiadou, C., & Osei, C. (2017). Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana: The Elephant in the Room. In Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa (pp. 167-194) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41090-6_10

Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana : The Elephant in the Room. / Omar Saad, Maktoba; Gutu, Mavis; Anastasiadou, Constantia; Osei, Collins.

Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa . 2017. p. 167-194.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Omar Saad, M, Gutu, M, Anastasiadou, C & Osei, C 2017, Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana: The Elephant in the Room. in Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa . pp. 167-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41090-6_10
Omar Saad M, Gutu M, Anastasiadou C, Osei C. Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana: The Elephant in the Room. In Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa . 2017. p. 167-194 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41090-6_10
Omar Saad, Maktoba ; Gutu, Mavis ; Anastasiadou, Constantia ; Osei, Collins. / Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana : The Elephant in the Room. Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa . 2017. pp. 167-194
@inbook{f202a546c7eb4fe39617071011982930,
title = "Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana: The Elephant in the Room",
abstract = "Purpose: In Sub-Saharan Africa, FDI performance is considerably different between Zimbabwe and its neighbouring countries. This chapter examines FDI determinants for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with particular emphasis on the comparison between Zimbabwe and Botswana.Design/methodology/approach: Using secondary data analysis, the study examined why Botswana was attracting more FDI than Zimbabwe in the period 2002-2012.Findings: Botswana is attractive due to the stability of the political and legal environments, high human capital and governance that promotes technological adoption. In contrast, Zimbabwe’s political instability and the government’s unwillingness to address the challenges the country is facing impedes FDI attraction and retention.What is original/value of the chapter: The chapter is of value to policy makers, as they plan and implement policies and foreign investors, in understanding how different determinants impact on location attractiveness.Research limitations: The study was based on secondary data analysis. Finding comparable data outside the study period was challenging.Practical implications: Zimbabwe needs to address the impact of its policy formulation and implementation on brand image and FDI attraction.",
keywords = "FDI, Zimbabwe, Botswana, Sub-Saharan, Africa , branding, image, spillovers",
author = "{Omar Saad}, Maktoba and Mavis Gutu and Constantia Anastasiadou and Collins Osei",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-41090-6_10",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-41090-6",
pages = "167--194",
booktitle = "Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Foreign Direct Investment in Zimbabwe and Botswana

T2 - The Elephant in the Room

AU - Omar Saad, Maktoba

AU - Gutu, Mavis

AU - Anastasiadou, Constantia

AU - Osei, Collins

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose: In Sub-Saharan Africa, FDI performance is considerably different between Zimbabwe and its neighbouring countries. This chapter examines FDI determinants for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with particular emphasis on the comparison between Zimbabwe and Botswana.Design/methodology/approach: Using secondary data analysis, the study examined why Botswana was attracting more FDI than Zimbabwe in the period 2002-2012.Findings: Botswana is attractive due to the stability of the political and legal environments, high human capital and governance that promotes technological adoption. In contrast, Zimbabwe’s political instability and the government’s unwillingness to address the challenges the country is facing impedes FDI attraction and retention.What is original/value of the chapter: The chapter is of value to policy makers, as they plan and implement policies and foreign investors, in understanding how different determinants impact on location attractiveness.Research limitations: The study was based on secondary data analysis. Finding comparable data outside the study period was challenging.Practical implications: Zimbabwe needs to address the impact of its policy formulation and implementation on brand image and FDI attraction.

AB - Purpose: In Sub-Saharan Africa, FDI performance is considerably different between Zimbabwe and its neighbouring countries. This chapter examines FDI determinants for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) with particular emphasis on the comparison between Zimbabwe and Botswana.Design/methodology/approach: Using secondary data analysis, the study examined why Botswana was attracting more FDI than Zimbabwe in the period 2002-2012.Findings: Botswana is attractive due to the stability of the political and legal environments, high human capital and governance that promotes technological adoption. In contrast, Zimbabwe’s political instability and the government’s unwillingness to address the challenges the country is facing impedes FDI attraction and retention.What is original/value of the chapter: The chapter is of value to policy makers, as they plan and implement policies and foreign investors, in understanding how different determinants impact on location attractiveness.Research limitations: The study was based on secondary data analysis. Finding comparable data outside the study period was challenging.Practical implications: Zimbabwe needs to address the impact of its policy formulation and implementation on brand image and FDI attraction.

KW - FDI

KW - Zimbabwe

KW - Botswana

KW - Sub-Saharan

KW - Africa

KW - branding

KW - image

KW - spillovers

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-41090-6_10

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-41090-6_10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-3-319-41090-6

SP - 167

EP - 194

BT - Managing Knowledge and Innovation for Business Sustainability in Africa

ER -