Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics: The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Abstract

2019 marks the 30th anniversary of Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael’s seminal 1989 paper in Sociologia Ruralis,
. Anticipating this event affords an opportunity to re-appraise the premises, theory, and temporal
conjuncture that informed their paper. The rise of the BRICS countries, and particularly China, also stimulates a re-appraisal of the premises and theoretical categories informing Food Regime Analysis as deployed by these authors. Thus, the rise of greater ‘positive coordination’ (Tilzey and Potter 2007) of food production and distribution by the state in the form, variously, of neo- mercantilism/neo-productivism and neo-developmentalism, as exemplified by China and the ‘pink tide’ states, serves not only to highlight a changed historical conjuncture in the wake of the 2007/8 food and financial crises (which we may denote as ‘post-neoliberal’), but, in so doing, also challenges more profoundly some of the theoretical foundations of Friedmann and McMichael’s – and particularly McMichael’s – characterization of food regimes. The paper argues that a fundamental re-appraisal of the basic theoretical categories deployed by Friedmann and McMichael in their development of Food Regime Analysis is long overdue, and that these basic categories comprise: capitalism, the state, and class, together with the nature of agency in relation to these categories. We propose concepts such as the ‘state-capital nexus’ and ‘structured agency’ (Tilzey 2016, 2017, 2018) as a means to resolve what are seen as significant difficulties and lacunae in Friedmann and McMichael’s original, and indeed ongoing, thinking in Food Regime Analysis. The deployment of these ‘new’ concepts enables us to conceive of much closer relations between capitalism, the modern state, class contestation, and imperialism in the dynamics of food regimes, concepts which imply that we should not be at all surprised by the re- emergence of phenomena such a neo-mercantilism and neo-developmentalism. The paper goes on to delineate key relations between the emergence of China as a sub-imperium and the dynamics of the ‘pink tide’ states in Latin America. The paper concludes by drawing out some of the implications of this ‘new’ theorisation of food regimes (and state, capital, class relations more generally) for anti- and post-capitalist emancipatory politics, particularly in relation to food sovereignty and a ‘dual strategy’ of counter-hegemony.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies
EditorsSergio Sauer
Place of PublicationBrasilia
PublisherBRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil
Pages1-32
Number of pages32
ISBN (Print)978-85-64593-74-9
Publication statusPublished - 12 Nov 2018
EventThe 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies
- University of Brasília, Brasília, Brazil
Duration: 12 Dec 201814 Dec 2018
Conference number: 6

Conference

ConferenceThe 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies
Abbreviated titleBICAS
CountryBrazil
CityBrasília
Period12/12/1814/12/18

Fingerprint

Latin America
food
China
mercantilism
capitalist society
imperialism
anniversary
hegemony
financial crisis
sovereignty
politics
event

Keywords

  • Food Regime Analysis
  • State-Capital Nexus
  • Post-Neoliberal Dynamics
  • China
  • Pink Tide’ States
  • Food Sovereignty

Cite this

Tilzey, M. (2018). Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics: The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America. In S. Sauer (Ed.), 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (pp. 1-32). Brasilia: BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil.

Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics : The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America. / Tilzey, Mark.

6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. ed. / Sergio Sauer. Brasilia : BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil, 2018. p. 1-32.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Tilzey, M 2018, Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics: The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America. in S Sauer (ed.), 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil, Brasilia, pp. 1-32, The 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies
, Brasília, Brazil, 12/12/18.
Tilzey M. Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics: The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America. In Sauer S, editor, 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. Brasilia: BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil. 2018. p. 1-32
Tilzey, Mark. / Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics : The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America. 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies. editor / Sergio Sauer. Brasilia : BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil, 2018. pp. 1-32
@inproceedings{12dca69d62994da7916fe8d56329b780,
title = "Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics: The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America",
abstract = "2019 marks the 30th anniversary of Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael’s seminal 1989 paper in Sociologia Ruralis,. Anticipating this event affords an opportunity to re-appraise the premises, theory, and temporalconjuncture that informed their paper. The rise of the BRICS countries, and particularly China, also stimulates a re-appraisal of the premises and theoretical categories informing Food Regime Analysis as deployed by these authors. Thus, the rise of greater ‘positive coordination’ (Tilzey and Potter 2007) of food production and distribution by the state in the form, variously, of neo- mercantilism/neo-productivism and neo-developmentalism, as exemplified by China and the ‘pink tide’ states, serves not only to highlight a changed historical conjuncture in the wake of the 2007/8 food and financial crises (which we may denote as ‘post-neoliberal’), but, in so doing, also challenges more profoundly some of the theoretical foundations of Friedmann and McMichael’s – and particularly McMichael’s – characterization of food regimes. The paper argues that a fundamental re-appraisal of the basic theoretical categories deployed by Friedmann and McMichael in their development of Food Regime Analysis is long overdue, and that these basic categories comprise: capitalism, the state, and class, together with the nature of agency in relation to these categories. We propose concepts such as the ‘state-capital nexus’ and ‘structured agency’ (Tilzey 2016, 2017, 2018) as a means to resolve what are seen as significant difficulties and lacunae in Friedmann and McMichael’s original, and indeed ongoing, thinking in Food Regime Analysis. The deployment of these ‘new’ concepts enables us to conceive of much closer relations between capitalism, the modern state, class contestation, and imperialism in the dynamics of food regimes, concepts which imply that we should not be at all surprised by the re- emergence of phenomena such a neo-mercantilism and neo-developmentalism. The paper goes on to delineate key relations between the emergence of China as a sub-imperium and the dynamics of the ‘pink tide’ states in Latin America. The paper concludes by drawing out some of the implications of this ‘new’ theorisation of food regimes (and state, capital, class relations more generally) for anti- and post-capitalist emancipatory politics, particularly in relation to food sovereignty and a ‘dual strategy’ of counter-hegemony.",
keywords = "Food Regime Analysis, State-Capital Nexus, Post-Neoliberal Dynamics, China, Pink Tide’ States, Food Sovereignty",
author = "Mark Tilzey",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "12",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-85-64593-74-9",
pages = "1--32",
editor = "Sergio Sauer",
booktitle = "6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies",
publisher = "BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Bras{\'i}lia, Brazil",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Food Regime Analysis and ‘Post-Neoliberal’ Dynamics

T2 - The State-Capital Nexus, China, and the Rise/Demise of ‘Pink Tide’ States in Latin America

AU - Tilzey, Mark

PY - 2018/11/12

Y1 - 2018/11/12

N2 - 2019 marks the 30th anniversary of Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael’s seminal 1989 paper in Sociologia Ruralis,. Anticipating this event affords an opportunity to re-appraise the premises, theory, and temporalconjuncture that informed their paper. The rise of the BRICS countries, and particularly China, also stimulates a re-appraisal of the premises and theoretical categories informing Food Regime Analysis as deployed by these authors. Thus, the rise of greater ‘positive coordination’ (Tilzey and Potter 2007) of food production and distribution by the state in the form, variously, of neo- mercantilism/neo-productivism and neo-developmentalism, as exemplified by China and the ‘pink tide’ states, serves not only to highlight a changed historical conjuncture in the wake of the 2007/8 food and financial crises (which we may denote as ‘post-neoliberal’), but, in so doing, also challenges more profoundly some of the theoretical foundations of Friedmann and McMichael’s – and particularly McMichael’s – characterization of food regimes. The paper argues that a fundamental re-appraisal of the basic theoretical categories deployed by Friedmann and McMichael in their development of Food Regime Analysis is long overdue, and that these basic categories comprise: capitalism, the state, and class, together with the nature of agency in relation to these categories. We propose concepts such as the ‘state-capital nexus’ and ‘structured agency’ (Tilzey 2016, 2017, 2018) as a means to resolve what are seen as significant difficulties and lacunae in Friedmann and McMichael’s original, and indeed ongoing, thinking in Food Regime Analysis. The deployment of these ‘new’ concepts enables us to conceive of much closer relations between capitalism, the modern state, class contestation, and imperialism in the dynamics of food regimes, concepts which imply that we should not be at all surprised by the re- emergence of phenomena such a neo-mercantilism and neo-developmentalism. The paper goes on to delineate key relations between the emergence of China as a sub-imperium and the dynamics of the ‘pink tide’ states in Latin America. The paper concludes by drawing out some of the implications of this ‘new’ theorisation of food regimes (and state, capital, class relations more generally) for anti- and post-capitalist emancipatory politics, particularly in relation to food sovereignty and a ‘dual strategy’ of counter-hegemony.

AB - 2019 marks the 30th anniversary of Harriet Friedmann and Philip McMichael’s seminal 1989 paper in Sociologia Ruralis,. Anticipating this event affords an opportunity to re-appraise the premises, theory, and temporalconjuncture that informed their paper. The rise of the BRICS countries, and particularly China, also stimulates a re-appraisal of the premises and theoretical categories informing Food Regime Analysis as deployed by these authors. Thus, the rise of greater ‘positive coordination’ (Tilzey and Potter 2007) of food production and distribution by the state in the form, variously, of neo- mercantilism/neo-productivism and neo-developmentalism, as exemplified by China and the ‘pink tide’ states, serves not only to highlight a changed historical conjuncture in the wake of the 2007/8 food and financial crises (which we may denote as ‘post-neoliberal’), but, in so doing, also challenges more profoundly some of the theoretical foundations of Friedmann and McMichael’s – and particularly McMichael’s – characterization of food regimes. The paper argues that a fundamental re-appraisal of the basic theoretical categories deployed by Friedmann and McMichael in their development of Food Regime Analysis is long overdue, and that these basic categories comprise: capitalism, the state, and class, together with the nature of agency in relation to these categories. We propose concepts such as the ‘state-capital nexus’ and ‘structured agency’ (Tilzey 2016, 2017, 2018) as a means to resolve what are seen as significant difficulties and lacunae in Friedmann and McMichael’s original, and indeed ongoing, thinking in Food Regime Analysis. The deployment of these ‘new’ concepts enables us to conceive of much closer relations between capitalism, the modern state, class contestation, and imperialism in the dynamics of food regimes, concepts which imply that we should not be at all surprised by the re- emergence of phenomena such a neo-mercantilism and neo-developmentalism. The paper goes on to delineate key relations between the emergence of China as a sub-imperium and the dynamics of the ‘pink tide’ states in Latin America. The paper concludes by drawing out some of the implications of this ‘new’ theorisation of food regimes (and state, capital, class relations more generally) for anti- and post-capitalist emancipatory politics, particularly in relation to food sovereignty and a ‘dual strategy’ of counter-hegemony.

KW - Food Regime Analysis

KW - State-Capital Nexus

KW - Post-Neoliberal Dynamics

KW - China

KW - Pink Tide’ States

KW - Food Sovereignty

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 978-85-64593-74-9

SP - 1

EP - 32

BT - 6th International Conference of the BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies

A2 - Sauer, Sergio

PB - BRICS Initiative for Critical Agrarian Studies (BICAS) in collaboration with: Universidade de Brasilia – UnB Brasília, Brazil

CY - Brasilia

ER -