Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    Conducting a flight testing programme in an academic environment can provide valuable research data and support ‘hands on’ teaching of traditional aerospace engineering subjects such as principles of flight, aircraft performance and flight dynamics. Balancing safety, data quality, time and cost presents unique challenges in this environment where budgets are usually limited and things don’t always go to plan. Two academic flight test programmes are described. The first, an applied research programme for the investigation of performance and handling qualities of light aeroplanes to better understand factors affecting loss control (LOC-I), involved 9 airframes, 4 different operators, 5 different airfields and 26 hours of testing conducted over a 13 month period by a TP & FTE. The second programme was developed to demonstrate flight dynamics to undergraduate engineers using activity led (‘hands-on’) learning principles. The series of flight exercises was designed to complement in-class lectures and tutorials, at the same time generating research data. The programme, supported by a TP and FTE was conducted using a Percival P40 Prentice circa 1948 (complete with stick-shaker!) and represents a probable first for UK University. This paper described the unique challenges and lessons learned attempting to ‘plan the flight’ and ‘fly the plan’.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2013
    Event24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers - Braunschweig, Germany
    Duration: 11 Jun 201313 Jun 2013

    Conference

    Conference24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers
    CountryGermany
    CityBraunschweig
    Period11/06/1313/06/13

    Fingerprint

    Flight dynamics
    Testing
    Aircraft
    Aerospace engineering
    Airframes
    Teaching
    Engineers
    Costs

    Bibliographical note

    This paper is not available on the repository. It was given at the 24th European Symposium Society of Flight Test Engineers, 11-13 June 2013 in Braunschweig, Germany

    Cite this

    Bromfield, M. (2013). Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned. Paper presented at 24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers, Braunschweig, Germany.

    Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned. / Bromfield, Mike.

    2013. Paper presented at 24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers, Braunschweig, Germany.

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Bromfield, M 2013, 'Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned' Paper presented at 24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers, Braunschweig, Germany, 11/06/13 - 13/06/13, .
    Bromfield M. Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned. 2013. Paper presented at 24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers, Braunschweig, Germany.
    Bromfield, Mike. / Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned. Paper presented at 24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers, Braunschweig, Germany.
    @conference{4ba8d9484f044838969789c620c34dc0,
    title = "Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned",
    abstract = "Conducting a flight testing programme in an academic environment can provide valuable research data and support ‘hands on’ teaching of traditional aerospace engineering subjects such as principles of flight, aircraft performance and flight dynamics. Balancing safety, data quality, time and cost presents unique challenges in this environment where budgets are usually limited and things don’t always go to plan. Two academic flight test programmes are described. The first, an applied research programme for the investigation of performance and handling qualities of light aeroplanes to better understand factors affecting loss control (LOC-I), involved 9 airframes, 4 different operators, 5 different airfields and 26 hours of testing conducted over a 13 month period by a TP & FTE. The second programme was developed to demonstrate flight dynamics to undergraduate engineers using activity led (‘hands-on’) learning principles. The series of flight exercises was designed to complement in-class lectures and tutorials, at the same time generating research data. The programme, supported by a TP and FTE was conducted using a Percival P40 Prentice circa 1948 (complete with stick-shaker!) and represents a probable first for UK University. This paper described the unique challenges and lessons learned attempting to ‘plan the flight’ and ‘fly the plan’.",
    author = "Mike Bromfield",
    note = "This paper is not available on the repository. It was given at the 24th European Symposium Society of Flight Test Engineers, 11-13 June 2013 in Braunschweig, Germany; 24th European Symposium of Society of Flight Test Engineers ; Conference date: 11-06-2013 Through 13-06-2013",
    year = "2013",
    language = "English",

    }

    TY - CONF

    T1 - Flight Testing in a University Environment – Challenges & Lessons Learned

    AU - Bromfield, Mike

    N1 - This paper is not available on the repository. It was given at the 24th European Symposium Society of Flight Test Engineers, 11-13 June 2013 in Braunschweig, Germany

    PY - 2013

    Y1 - 2013

    N2 - Conducting a flight testing programme in an academic environment can provide valuable research data and support ‘hands on’ teaching of traditional aerospace engineering subjects such as principles of flight, aircraft performance and flight dynamics. Balancing safety, data quality, time and cost presents unique challenges in this environment where budgets are usually limited and things don’t always go to plan. Two academic flight test programmes are described. The first, an applied research programme for the investigation of performance and handling qualities of light aeroplanes to better understand factors affecting loss control (LOC-I), involved 9 airframes, 4 different operators, 5 different airfields and 26 hours of testing conducted over a 13 month period by a TP & FTE. The second programme was developed to demonstrate flight dynamics to undergraduate engineers using activity led (‘hands-on’) learning principles. The series of flight exercises was designed to complement in-class lectures and tutorials, at the same time generating research data. The programme, supported by a TP and FTE was conducted using a Percival P40 Prentice circa 1948 (complete with stick-shaker!) and represents a probable first for UK University. This paper described the unique challenges and lessons learned attempting to ‘plan the flight’ and ‘fly the plan’.

    AB - Conducting a flight testing programme in an academic environment can provide valuable research data and support ‘hands on’ teaching of traditional aerospace engineering subjects such as principles of flight, aircraft performance and flight dynamics. Balancing safety, data quality, time and cost presents unique challenges in this environment where budgets are usually limited and things don’t always go to plan. Two academic flight test programmes are described. The first, an applied research programme for the investigation of performance and handling qualities of light aeroplanes to better understand factors affecting loss control (LOC-I), involved 9 airframes, 4 different operators, 5 different airfields and 26 hours of testing conducted over a 13 month period by a TP & FTE. The second programme was developed to demonstrate flight dynamics to undergraduate engineers using activity led (‘hands-on’) learning principles. The series of flight exercises was designed to complement in-class lectures and tutorials, at the same time generating research data. The programme, supported by a TP and FTE was conducted using a Percival P40 Prentice circa 1948 (complete with stick-shaker!) and represents a probable first for UK University. This paper described the unique challenges and lessons learned attempting to ‘plan the flight’ and ‘fly the plan’.

    M3 - Paper

    ER -