Fighting Capital Flight in Africa: Evidence from Bundling and Unbundling Governance

S. A. Asongu, Jacinta C. Nwachukwu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of governance on capital flight by bundling and unbundling governance. The empirical evidence is based on 37 African countries for the period 1996–2010 and the Generalised Method of Moments. Governance is bundled by principal component analysis, namely: (i) political governance from political stability and ‘voice and accountability’; (ii) economic governance from government effectiveness and regulation quality and (iii) institutional governance from corruption-control and the rule of law. The following findings are established. (i) Political stability and ‘voice and accountability’ reduce capital flight while the collective effect of political governance is not significant. (ii) Economic governance increases capital flight whereas the individual effects of regulation quality and government effectiveness are not significant. (iii) Corruption-control and institutional governance negatively affect capital flight whereas the impact of the rule of law is not significant. (iv) Taken together, Corruption-control is the most effective governance weapon in the fight against capital flight. (v) Priority in the Washington Consensus is more effective at fighting capital flight compared to the Beijing Model. Policy implications are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)305–323
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Industry, Competition and Trade
Volume17
Issue number3
Early online date27 Dec 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2017

Fingerprint

Unbundling
Bundling
Capital flight
Governance
Africa
Corruption
Government
Rule of law
Accountability
Economics
Political stability
Empirical evidence
Beijing
Washington Consensus
Policy implications
Individual effects
African countries
Generalized method of moments
Principal component analysis

Bibliographical note

The full text is currently unavailable on the repository.

This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

Keywords

  • Econometric modelling
  • Capital flight
  • Governance
  • Africa

Cite this

Fighting Capital Flight in Africa: Evidence from Bundling and Unbundling Governance. / Asongu, S. A.; Nwachukwu, Jacinta C.

In: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol. 17, No. 3, 09.2017, p. 305–323.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Asongu, S. A. ; Nwachukwu, Jacinta C. / Fighting Capital Flight in Africa: Evidence from Bundling and Unbundling Governance. In: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 2017 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 305–323.
@article{3f96e74a24254f02a9378f2ae9c8ed35,
title = "Fighting Capital Flight in Africa: Evidence from Bundling and Unbundling Governance",
abstract = "This study investigates the effect of governance on capital flight by bundling and unbundling governance. The empirical evidence is based on 37 African countries for the period 1996–2010 and the Generalised Method of Moments. Governance is bundled by principal component analysis, namely: (i) political governance from political stability and ‘voice and accountability’; (ii) economic governance from government effectiveness and regulation quality and (iii) institutional governance from corruption-control and the rule of law. The following findings are established. (i) Political stability and ‘voice and accountability’ reduce capital flight while the collective effect of political governance is not significant. (ii) Economic governance increases capital flight whereas the individual effects of regulation quality and government effectiveness are not significant. (iii) Corruption-control and institutional governance negatively affect capital flight whereas the impact of the rule of law is not significant. (iv) Taken together, Corruption-control is the most effective governance weapon in the fight against capital flight. (v) Priority in the Washington Consensus is more effective at fighting capital flight compared to the Beijing Model. Policy implications are discussed.",
keywords = "Econometric modelling, Capital flight, Governance, Africa",
author = "Asongu, {S. A.} and Nwachukwu, {Jacinta C.}",
note = "The full text is currently unavailable on the repository. This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s10842-016-0240-1",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "305–323",
journal = "Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade",
issn = "1566-1679",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fighting Capital Flight in Africa: Evidence from Bundling and Unbundling Governance

AU - Asongu, S. A.

AU - Nwachukwu, Jacinta C.

N1 - The full text is currently unavailable on the repository. This article is currently in press. Full citation details will be uploaded when available.

PY - 2017/9

Y1 - 2017/9

N2 - This study investigates the effect of governance on capital flight by bundling and unbundling governance. The empirical evidence is based on 37 African countries for the period 1996–2010 and the Generalised Method of Moments. Governance is bundled by principal component analysis, namely: (i) political governance from political stability and ‘voice and accountability’; (ii) economic governance from government effectiveness and regulation quality and (iii) institutional governance from corruption-control and the rule of law. The following findings are established. (i) Political stability and ‘voice and accountability’ reduce capital flight while the collective effect of political governance is not significant. (ii) Economic governance increases capital flight whereas the individual effects of regulation quality and government effectiveness are not significant. (iii) Corruption-control and institutional governance negatively affect capital flight whereas the impact of the rule of law is not significant. (iv) Taken together, Corruption-control is the most effective governance weapon in the fight against capital flight. (v) Priority in the Washington Consensus is more effective at fighting capital flight compared to the Beijing Model. Policy implications are discussed.

AB - This study investigates the effect of governance on capital flight by bundling and unbundling governance. The empirical evidence is based on 37 African countries for the period 1996–2010 and the Generalised Method of Moments. Governance is bundled by principal component analysis, namely: (i) political governance from political stability and ‘voice and accountability’; (ii) economic governance from government effectiveness and regulation quality and (iii) institutional governance from corruption-control and the rule of law. The following findings are established. (i) Political stability and ‘voice and accountability’ reduce capital flight while the collective effect of political governance is not significant. (ii) Economic governance increases capital flight whereas the individual effects of regulation quality and government effectiveness are not significant. (iii) Corruption-control and institutional governance negatively affect capital flight whereas the impact of the rule of law is not significant. (iv) Taken together, Corruption-control is the most effective governance weapon in the fight against capital flight. (v) Priority in the Washington Consensus is more effective at fighting capital flight compared to the Beijing Model. Policy implications are discussed.

KW - Econometric modelling

KW - Capital flight

KW - Governance

KW - Africa

U2 - 10.1007/s10842-016-0240-1

DO - 10.1007/s10842-016-0240-1

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 305

EP - 323

JO - Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

JF - Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

SN - 1566-1679

IS - 3

ER -