Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a guided workbook intervention to support work-related goals among cancer survivors in the UK

Elizabeth Grunfeld, Lauren Schumacher, Maria Armaou, Pernille Woods, Pauline Rolf, Andrew Sutton, Anjali Zarkar, Steven Sadhra

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objectives Employment following illness is associated with better physical and psychological functioning. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theoretically led workbook intervention designed to support patients with cancer returning to work. Design Parallel-group randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews. Setting Oncology clinics within four English National Health Service Trusts. Participants Patients who had received a diagnosis of breast, gynaecological, prostate or colorectal cancer and who had been receiving treatment for a minimum of two weeks. Intervention A self-guided WorkPlan workbook designed to support patients with cancer to return to work with fortnightly telephone support calls to discuss progress. The control group received treatment as usual and was offered the workbook at the end of their 12-month follow-up. Outcome measures We assessed aspects of feasibility including eligibility, recruitment, data collection, attrition, feasibility of the methodology, acceptability of the intervention and potential to calculate cost-effectiveness. Results The recruitment rate of eligible patients was 44%; 68 participants consented and 58 (85%) completed baseline measures. Randomisation procedures were acceptable, data collection methods (including cost-effectiveness data) were feasible and the intervention was acceptable to participants. Retention rates at 6-month and 12-month follow-up were 72% and 69%, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, 30% of the usual care group had returned to full-time or part-time work (including phased return to work) compared with 43% of the intervention group. At 12 months, the percentages were 47% (usual care) and 68% (intervention). Conclusions The findings confirm the feasibility of a definitive trial, although further consideration needs to be given to increasing the participation rates among men and black and ethnic minority patients diagnosed with cancer.

LanguageEnglish
Article numbere022746
JournalBMJ Open
Volume9
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 21 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Survivors
Randomized Controlled Trials
Return to Work
Neoplasms
Cost-Benefit Analysis
National Health Programs
Random Allocation
Telephone
Colorectal Neoplasms
Prostatic Neoplasms
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Interviews
Breast Neoplasms
Psychology
Control Groups
Therapeutics

Bibliographical note

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Keywords

  • cancer
  • employment
  • feasibility
  • intervention
  • randomised controlled trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a guided workbook intervention to support work-related goals among cancer survivors in the UK. / Grunfeld, Elizabeth; Schumacher, Lauren; Armaou, Maria; Woods, Pernille; Rolf, Pauline; Sutton, Andrew; Zarkar, Anjali; Sadhra, Steven.

In: BMJ Open, Vol. 9, No. 1, e022746, 21.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Grunfeld, Elizabeth ; Schumacher, Lauren ; Armaou, Maria ; Woods, Pernille ; Rolf, Pauline ; Sutton, Andrew ; Zarkar, Anjali ; Sadhra, Steven. / Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a guided workbook intervention to support work-related goals among cancer survivors in the UK. In: BMJ Open. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 1.
@article{93155bb3abb24326a83d1ede1075d485,
title = "Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a guided workbook intervention to support work-related goals among cancer survivors in the UK",
abstract = "Objectives Employment following illness is associated with better physical and psychological functioning. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theoretically led workbook intervention designed to support patients with cancer returning to work. Design Parallel-group randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews. Setting Oncology clinics within four English National Health Service Trusts. Participants Patients who had received a diagnosis of breast, gynaecological, prostate or colorectal cancer and who had been receiving treatment for a minimum of two weeks. Intervention A self-guided WorkPlan workbook designed to support patients with cancer to return to work with fortnightly telephone support calls to discuss progress. The control group received treatment as usual and was offered the workbook at the end of their 12-month follow-up. Outcome measures We assessed aspects of feasibility including eligibility, recruitment, data collection, attrition, feasibility of the methodology, acceptability of the intervention and potential to calculate cost-effectiveness. Results The recruitment rate of eligible patients was 44{\%}; 68 participants consented and 58 (85{\%}) completed baseline measures. Randomisation procedures were acceptable, data collection methods (including cost-effectiveness data) were feasible and the intervention was acceptable to participants. Retention rates at 6-month and 12-month follow-up were 72{\%} and 69{\%}, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, 30{\%} of the usual care group had returned to full-time or part-time work (including phased return to work) compared with 43{\%} of the intervention group. At 12 months, the percentages were 47{\%} (usual care) and 68{\%} (intervention). Conclusions The findings confirm the feasibility of a definitive trial, although further consideration needs to be given to increasing the participation rates among men and black and ethnic minority patients diagnosed with cancer.",
keywords = "cancer, employment, feasibility, intervention, randomised controlled trial",
author = "Elizabeth Grunfeld and Lauren Schumacher and Maria Armaou and Pernille Woods and Pauline Rolf and Andrew Sutton and Anjali Zarkar and Steven Sadhra",
note = "{\circledC} Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022746",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "BMJ Open",
issn = "2044-6055",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Feasibility randomised controlled trial of a guided workbook intervention to support work-related goals among cancer survivors in the UK

AU - Grunfeld, Elizabeth

AU - Schumacher, Lauren

AU - Armaou, Maria

AU - Woods, Pernille

AU - Rolf, Pauline

AU - Sutton, Andrew

AU - Zarkar, Anjali

AU - Sadhra, Steven

N1 - © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2018. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

PY - 2019/1/21

Y1 - 2019/1/21

N2 - Objectives Employment following illness is associated with better physical and psychological functioning. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theoretically led workbook intervention designed to support patients with cancer returning to work. Design Parallel-group randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews. Setting Oncology clinics within four English National Health Service Trusts. Participants Patients who had received a diagnosis of breast, gynaecological, prostate or colorectal cancer and who had been receiving treatment for a minimum of two weeks. Intervention A self-guided WorkPlan workbook designed to support patients with cancer to return to work with fortnightly telephone support calls to discuss progress. The control group received treatment as usual and was offered the workbook at the end of their 12-month follow-up. Outcome measures We assessed aspects of feasibility including eligibility, recruitment, data collection, attrition, feasibility of the methodology, acceptability of the intervention and potential to calculate cost-effectiveness. Results The recruitment rate of eligible patients was 44%; 68 participants consented and 58 (85%) completed baseline measures. Randomisation procedures were acceptable, data collection methods (including cost-effectiveness data) were feasible and the intervention was acceptable to participants. Retention rates at 6-month and 12-month follow-up were 72% and 69%, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, 30% of the usual care group had returned to full-time or part-time work (including phased return to work) compared with 43% of the intervention group. At 12 months, the percentages were 47% (usual care) and 68% (intervention). Conclusions The findings confirm the feasibility of a definitive trial, although further consideration needs to be given to increasing the participation rates among men and black and ethnic minority patients diagnosed with cancer.

AB - Objectives Employment following illness is associated with better physical and psychological functioning. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of a theoretically led workbook intervention designed to support patients with cancer returning to work. Design Parallel-group randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews. Setting Oncology clinics within four English National Health Service Trusts. Participants Patients who had received a diagnosis of breast, gynaecological, prostate or colorectal cancer and who had been receiving treatment for a minimum of two weeks. Intervention A self-guided WorkPlan workbook designed to support patients with cancer to return to work with fortnightly telephone support calls to discuss progress. The control group received treatment as usual and was offered the workbook at the end of their 12-month follow-up. Outcome measures We assessed aspects of feasibility including eligibility, recruitment, data collection, attrition, feasibility of the methodology, acceptability of the intervention and potential to calculate cost-effectiveness. Results The recruitment rate of eligible patients was 44%; 68 participants consented and 58 (85%) completed baseline measures. Randomisation procedures were acceptable, data collection methods (including cost-effectiveness data) were feasible and the intervention was acceptable to participants. Retention rates at 6-month and 12-month follow-up were 72% and 69%, respectively. At 6-month follow-up, 30% of the usual care group had returned to full-time or part-time work (including phased return to work) compared with 43% of the intervention group. At 12 months, the percentages were 47% (usual care) and 68% (intervention). Conclusions The findings confirm the feasibility of a definitive trial, although further consideration needs to be given to increasing the participation rates among men and black and ethnic minority patients diagnosed with cancer.

KW - cancer

KW - employment

KW - feasibility

KW - intervention

KW - randomised controlled trial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060372217&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022746

DO - 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022746

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - BMJ Open

T2 - BMJ Open

JF - BMJ Open

SN - 2044-6055

IS - 1

M1 - e022746

ER -