Fat politics as a constituent of intersecting intimacies

Lucy Aphramor, Kimberly Dark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we explore the ways in which fat politics shapes (our) fat-thin intimacies as friends, colleagues and occasional lovers. We are queer writers who are actively engaged in fat politics; one of us is fat and the other is thin. We are both poets, scholars, and performers, privileged by whiteness, and contingently read as non-disabled. This paper takes the form of alternating reflections where we explore the nuances of our thoughts and feelings about friendship, romantic involvement, and engagement in learning communities. Specifically, we surface the ways that the various realms of our relationship are co-constituted by fatness, gender, and trauma histories. While we have both had fat and thin lovers before, Kimberly is the first fat, fat- affirming lover Lucy had, and Lucy is the first thin lover Kimberly had who was pre-educated and pre-experienced regarding fat stigma, fat shame, and social bias. We investigate what this shared political grounding made possible through the trust and vulnerability thus enabled. We also consider the erotic as an influence on scholarship which leads to praxis.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-press)
Number of pages13
JournalFat Studies Journal
Volume(In-press)
Early online date25 Mar 2022
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 25 Mar 2022

Bibliographical note

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.

Keywords

  • Erosion and accretion pattern
  • kinship
  • liberatory praxis
  • queerness
  • madness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Fat politics as a constituent of intersecting intimacies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this