Fast And Slow Readers And The Effectiveness Of The Spatial Frequency Content Of Text: Evidence From Reading Times And Eye Movements

Timothy R. Jordan, Jasmine Dixon, Victoria A McGowan, Stoyan Kurtev, Kevin B Paterson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)
15 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Text contains a range of different spatial frequencies but the effectiveness of spatial frequencies for normal variations in skilled adult reading ability is unknown. Accordingly, young skilled adult readers showing fast or slow reading ability read sentences displayed as normal or filtered to contain only very low, low, medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. Reading times and eye movement measures of fixations and saccades assessed the effectiveness of these displays for reading. Reading times showed that, for each reading ability, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies were all more effective than lower spatial frequencies. Indeed, for each reading ability, reading times for normal text were maintained when text contained only medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. However, reading times for normal text and for each spatial frequency were all substantially shorter for fast readers than for slow readers, and this advantage for fast readers was similar for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies but much larger for low and very low spatial frequencies. In addition, fast readers made fewer and shorter fixations, fewer and shorter regressions, and longer forward saccades, than slow readers, and these differences were generally similar in size for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies, but larger when spatial frequencies were lower. These findings suggest that fast and slow adult readers can each use a range of different spatial frequencies for reading but fast readers make more effective use of these spatial frequencies and especially those that are lower.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1066-1071
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume42
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Eye Movements
Reading
Saccades
Reading Time
Reader
Spatial Frequency
Young Adult

Bibliographical note

This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

Cite this

Fast And Slow Readers And The Effectiveness Of The Spatial Frequency Content Of Text : Evidence From Reading Times And Eye Movements. / Jordan, Timothy R.; Dixon, Jasmine; McGowan, Victoria A; Kurtev, Stoyan; Paterson, Kevin B.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 42, No. 8, 08.2016, p. 1066-1071.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jordan, Timothy R. ; Dixon, Jasmine ; McGowan, Victoria A ; Kurtev, Stoyan ; Paterson, Kevin B. / Fast And Slow Readers And The Effectiveness Of The Spatial Frequency Content Of Text : Evidence From Reading Times And Eye Movements. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2016 ; Vol. 42, No. 8. pp. 1066-1071.
@article{c091805337264ceeaa36a4d6cae2aabe,
title = "Fast And Slow Readers And The Effectiveness Of The Spatial Frequency Content Of Text: Evidence From Reading Times And Eye Movements",
abstract = "Text contains a range of different spatial frequencies but the effectiveness of spatial frequencies for normal variations in skilled adult reading ability is unknown. Accordingly, young skilled adult readers showing fast or slow reading ability read sentences displayed as normal or filtered to contain only very low, low, medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. Reading times and eye movement measures of fixations and saccades assessed the effectiveness of these displays for reading. Reading times showed that, for each reading ability, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies were all more effective than lower spatial frequencies. Indeed, for each reading ability, reading times for normal text were maintained when text contained only medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. However, reading times for normal text and for each spatial frequency were all substantially shorter for fast readers than for slow readers, and this advantage for fast readers was similar for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies but much larger for low and very low spatial frequencies. In addition, fast readers made fewer and shorter fixations, fewer and shorter regressions, and longer forward saccades, than slow readers, and these differences were generally similar in size for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies, but larger when spatial frequencies were lower. These findings suggest that fast and slow adult readers can each use a range of different spatial frequencies for reading but fast readers make more effective use of these spatial frequencies and especially those that are lower.",
author = "Jordan, {Timothy R.} and Jasmine Dixon and McGowan, {Victoria A} and Stoyan Kurtev and Paterson, {Kevin B}",
note = "This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1037/xhp0000234",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1066--1071",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance",
issn = "0096-1523",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast And Slow Readers And The Effectiveness Of The Spatial Frequency Content Of Text

T2 - Evidence From Reading Times And Eye Movements

AU - Jordan, Timothy R.

AU - Dixon, Jasmine

AU - McGowan, Victoria A

AU - Kurtev, Stoyan

AU - Paterson, Kevin B

N1 - This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - Text contains a range of different spatial frequencies but the effectiveness of spatial frequencies for normal variations in skilled adult reading ability is unknown. Accordingly, young skilled adult readers showing fast or slow reading ability read sentences displayed as normal or filtered to contain only very low, low, medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. Reading times and eye movement measures of fixations and saccades assessed the effectiveness of these displays for reading. Reading times showed that, for each reading ability, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies were all more effective than lower spatial frequencies. Indeed, for each reading ability, reading times for normal text were maintained when text contained only medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. However, reading times for normal text and for each spatial frequency were all substantially shorter for fast readers than for slow readers, and this advantage for fast readers was similar for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies but much larger for low and very low spatial frequencies. In addition, fast readers made fewer and shorter fixations, fewer and shorter regressions, and longer forward saccades, than slow readers, and these differences were generally similar in size for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies, but larger when spatial frequencies were lower. These findings suggest that fast and slow adult readers can each use a range of different spatial frequencies for reading but fast readers make more effective use of these spatial frequencies and especially those that are lower.

AB - Text contains a range of different spatial frequencies but the effectiveness of spatial frequencies for normal variations in skilled adult reading ability is unknown. Accordingly, young skilled adult readers showing fast or slow reading ability read sentences displayed as normal or filtered to contain only very low, low, medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. Reading times and eye movement measures of fixations and saccades assessed the effectiveness of these displays for reading. Reading times showed that, for each reading ability, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies were all more effective than lower spatial frequencies. Indeed, for each reading ability, reading times for normal text were maintained when text contained only medium, high, or very high spatial frequencies. However, reading times for normal text and for each spatial frequency were all substantially shorter for fast readers than for slow readers, and this advantage for fast readers was similar for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies but much larger for low and very low spatial frequencies. In addition, fast readers made fewer and shorter fixations, fewer and shorter regressions, and longer forward saccades, than slow readers, and these differences were generally similar in size for normal, medium, high, and very high spatial frequencies, but larger when spatial frequencies were lower. These findings suggest that fast and slow adult readers can each use a range of different spatial frequencies for reading but fast readers make more effective use of these spatial frequencies and especially those that are lower.

U2 - 10.1037/xhp0000234

DO - 10.1037/xhp0000234

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 1066

EP - 1071

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

SN - 0096-1523

IS - 8

ER -