Examining power struggles as a signifier of successful partnership working: A case study of partnership dynamics

Petra Derkzen, Alex Franklin, Bettina Bock

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In Britain, and Wales particularly, inclusion and equal opportunities for all became key principles guiding the work of the many partnerships that were established at the beginning of this century. A primary objective of this paper is to develop a greater understanding of the politics and processes within 'partnership' as a widely used governance instrument. We argue that rather than dismissing partnerships for their exclusionary mechanisms, they might be considered as distinctive 'arenas of power' where the emphasis on participation and consensus shapes power relations in particular ways. What we demonstrate, using a differentiated topology of power [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing], is the effect that different modes of power, at different times, can have on social interaction and the process of partnership working. Although inequality in terms of resources existed in our study, we show that effective partnership working was enhanced at times when more reciprocal modes of power were used. We conclude, therefore, that an analysis of power based on resources alone is limited because the use and effect of resources may be "modified, displaced or disrupted depending upon the relationships that come into play" [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing, p. 97]. Hence, there is a need for more research on power struggles and conflicts in partnerships over time. Only then it is possible to see how and when differences in resources affect social interaction and result in different levels of (in)equality. A partnership cannot be seen simply as an indirect instrument of a dominant government actor to control organisations and individuals.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)458-466
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Rural Studies
Volume24
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

power struggle
resource
power relations
resources
topology
politics
geography
equal opportunity
interaction
equality
inclusion
governance
participation
effect

Keywords

  • Inequality
  • Partnership
  • Power
  • Rural development
  • Wales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Examining power struggles as a signifier of successful partnership working : A case study of partnership dynamics. / Derkzen, Petra; Franklin, Alex; Bock, Bettina.

In: Journal of Rural Studies, Vol. 24, No. 4, 01.10.2008, p. 458-466.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{bfe385e288cf4d0eadd6a4e18eb0d69d,
title = "Examining power struggles as a signifier of successful partnership working: A case study of partnership dynamics",
abstract = "In Britain, and Wales particularly, inclusion and equal opportunities for all became key principles guiding the work of the many partnerships that were established at the beginning of this century. A primary objective of this paper is to develop a greater understanding of the politics and processes within 'partnership' as a widely used governance instrument. We argue that rather than dismissing partnerships for their exclusionary mechanisms, they might be considered as distinctive 'arenas of power' where the emphasis on participation and consensus shapes power relations in particular ways. What we demonstrate, using a differentiated topology of power [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing], is the effect that different modes of power, at different times, can have on social interaction and the process of partnership working. Although inequality in terms of resources existed in our study, we show that effective partnership working was enhanced at times when more reciprocal modes of power were used. We conclude, therefore, that an analysis of power based on resources alone is limited because the use and effect of resources may be {"}modified, displaced or disrupted depending upon the relationships that come into play{"} [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing, p. 97]. Hence, there is a need for more research on power struggles and conflicts in partnerships over time. Only then it is possible to see how and when differences in resources affect social interaction and result in different levels of (in)equality. A partnership cannot be seen simply as an indirect instrument of a dominant government actor to control organisations and individuals.",
keywords = "Inequality, Partnership, Power, Rural development, Wales",
author = "Petra Derkzen and Alex Franklin and Bettina Bock",
year = "2008",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.010",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "458--466",
journal = "Journal of Rural Studies",
issn = "0743-0167",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining power struggles as a signifier of successful partnership working

T2 - A case study of partnership dynamics

AU - Derkzen, Petra

AU - Franklin, Alex

AU - Bock, Bettina

PY - 2008/10/1

Y1 - 2008/10/1

N2 - In Britain, and Wales particularly, inclusion and equal opportunities for all became key principles guiding the work of the many partnerships that were established at the beginning of this century. A primary objective of this paper is to develop a greater understanding of the politics and processes within 'partnership' as a widely used governance instrument. We argue that rather than dismissing partnerships for their exclusionary mechanisms, they might be considered as distinctive 'arenas of power' where the emphasis on participation and consensus shapes power relations in particular ways. What we demonstrate, using a differentiated topology of power [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing], is the effect that different modes of power, at different times, can have on social interaction and the process of partnership working. Although inequality in terms of resources existed in our study, we show that effective partnership working was enhanced at times when more reciprocal modes of power were used. We conclude, therefore, that an analysis of power based on resources alone is limited because the use and effect of resources may be "modified, displaced or disrupted depending upon the relationships that come into play" [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing, p. 97]. Hence, there is a need for more research on power struggles and conflicts in partnerships over time. Only then it is possible to see how and when differences in resources affect social interaction and result in different levels of (in)equality. A partnership cannot be seen simply as an indirect instrument of a dominant government actor to control organisations and individuals.

AB - In Britain, and Wales particularly, inclusion and equal opportunities for all became key principles guiding the work of the many partnerships that were established at the beginning of this century. A primary objective of this paper is to develop a greater understanding of the politics and processes within 'partnership' as a widely used governance instrument. We argue that rather than dismissing partnerships for their exclusionary mechanisms, they might be considered as distinctive 'arenas of power' where the emphasis on participation and consensus shapes power relations in particular ways. What we demonstrate, using a differentiated topology of power [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing], is the effect that different modes of power, at different times, can have on social interaction and the process of partnership working. Although inequality in terms of resources existed in our study, we show that effective partnership working was enhanced at times when more reciprocal modes of power were used. We conclude, therefore, that an analysis of power based on resources alone is limited because the use and effect of resources may be "modified, displaced or disrupted depending upon the relationships that come into play" [Allen, J., 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Blackwell Publishing, p. 97]. Hence, there is a need for more research on power struggles and conflicts in partnerships over time. Only then it is possible to see how and when differences in resources affect social interaction and result in different levels of (in)equality. A partnership cannot be seen simply as an indirect instrument of a dominant government actor to control organisations and individuals.

KW - Inequality

KW - Partnership

KW - Power

KW - Rural development

KW - Wales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50949121796&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.010

DO - 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.03.010

M3 - Review article

VL - 24

SP - 458

EP - 466

JO - Journal of Rural Studies

JF - Journal of Rural Studies

SN - 0743-0167

IS - 4

ER -