Examining Legacies of Unsuccessful Olympic Bids: Evidence from a Cross-Case Analysis

Becca Leopkey, Paul Salisbury, Cem Tinaz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The purpose of this paper was to explore the legacies of failed bids in applicant and candidature cities for the Olympic Games. More specifically, we were interested in understanding 1) what are the legacies from unsuccessful Olympic Games bids, and 2) what are the prominent issues related to legacy associated with failed bidding attempts? In order to accomplish this, an iterative case study of three previous Olympic bid cities: Manchester (1996, 2000), Chicago (2016) and Istanbul (2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2020) were used to better understand this particular phenomenon. Twelve different failed bid legacy themes across the three cases emerged including: brand perception, coordination, community,
economic, environmental, knowledge, personal, policy, psychological, relationships, structural, and urban. In addition to the broad legacy themes, two additional failed bid legacy issues were identified and elucidated. They included failed bid promises and a lack differentiation between bid and event legacy.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)(In-press)
JournalJournal of Global Sport Management
Volume(In-press)
Early online date2 May 2019
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 May 2019

Fingerprint

Olympic Games
applicant
evidence
event
lack
community
economics

Keywords

  • Failed bids
  • Legacy
  • Sport events
  • Olympic Games

Cite this

Examining Legacies of Unsuccessful Olympic Bids: Evidence from a Cross-Case Analysis. / Leopkey, Becca; Salisbury, Paul; Tinaz, Cem .

In: Journal of Global Sport Management, Vol. (In-press), 02.05.2019, p. (In-press).

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bdc16ab30ab04804b0ab2e13d3648a14,
title = "Examining Legacies of Unsuccessful Olympic Bids: Evidence from a Cross-Case Analysis",
abstract = "The purpose of this paper was to explore the legacies of failed bids in applicant and candidature cities for the Olympic Games. More specifically, we were interested in understanding 1) what are the legacies from unsuccessful Olympic Games bids, and 2) what are the prominent issues related to legacy associated with failed bidding attempts? In order to accomplish this, an iterative case study of three previous Olympic bid cities: Manchester (1996, 2000), Chicago (2016) and Istanbul (2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2020) were used to better understand this particular phenomenon. Twelve different failed bid legacy themes across the three cases emerged including: brand perception, coordination, community,economic, environmental, knowledge, personal, policy, psychological, relationships, structural, and urban. In addition to the broad legacy themes, two additional failed bid legacy issues were identified and elucidated. They included failed bid promises and a lack differentiation between bid and event legacy.",
keywords = "Failed bids, Legacy, Sport events, Olympic Games",
author = "Becca Leopkey and Paul Salisbury and Cem Tinaz",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/24704067.2019.1604072",
language = "English",
volume = "(In-press)",
pages = "(In--press)",
journal = "Journal of Global Sport Management",
issn = "2470-4075",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining Legacies of Unsuccessful Olympic Bids: Evidence from a Cross-Case Analysis

AU - Leopkey, Becca

AU - Salisbury, Paul

AU - Tinaz, Cem

PY - 2019/5/2

Y1 - 2019/5/2

N2 - The purpose of this paper was to explore the legacies of failed bids in applicant and candidature cities for the Olympic Games. More specifically, we were interested in understanding 1) what are the legacies from unsuccessful Olympic Games bids, and 2) what are the prominent issues related to legacy associated with failed bidding attempts? In order to accomplish this, an iterative case study of three previous Olympic bid cities: Manchester (1996, 2000), Chicago (2016) and Istanbul (2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2020) were used to better understand this particular phenomenon. Twelve different failed bid legacy themes across the three cases emerged including: brand perception, coordination, community,economic, environmental, knowledge, personal, policy, psychological, relationships, structural, and urban. In addition to the broad legacy themes, two additional failed bid legacy issues were identified and elucidated. They included failed bid promises and a lack differentiation between bid and event legacy.

AB - The purpose of this paper was to explore the legacies of failed bids in applicant and candidature cities for the Olympic Games. More specifically, we were interested in understanding 1) what are the legacies from unsuccessful Olympic Games bids, and 2) what are the prominent issues related to legacy associated with failed bidding attempts? In order to accomplish this, an iterative case study of three previous Olympic bid cities: Manchester (1996, 2000), Chicago (2016) and Istanbul (2000, 2004, 2008, 2012, 2020) were used to better understand this particular phenomenon. Twelve different failed bid legacy themes across the three cases emerged including: brand perception, coordination, community,economic, environmental, knowledge, personal, policy, psychological, relationships, structural, and urban. In addition to the broad legacy themes, two additional failed bid legacy issues were identified and elucidated. They included failed bid promises and a lack differentiation between bid and event legacy.

KW - Failed bids

KW - Legacy

KW - Sport events

KW - Olympic Games

U2 - 10.1080/24704067.2019.1604072

DO - 10.1080/24704067.2019.1604072

M3 - Article

VL - (In-press)

SP - (In-press)

JO - Journal of Global Sport Management

JF - Journal of Global Sport Management

SN - 2470-4075

ER -