“Everyday Democracy”: an ethnographic methodology for the evaluation of (de-) democratisation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Comparative democracy indices such as Freedom House Nations in Transit underpin many scholars’ perceptions of democratic progress and backsliding. However, these fail to account empirically for practices of deliberation, a central concern in contemporary democratic theory. They also fail to address the ideational nature of emergent global challenges to democracy. This article addresses these domains of empirical neglect by presenting an “Everyday Democracy” approach to democracy evaluation, an ethnographic methodology rooted in an engagement with democratic theory. Data collected in Serbia and Bulgaria is contrasted, revealing a more vibrant and contested public sphere in Serbia, which is usually graded as less democratic. This finding highlights the need for a reassessment of some assumptions that underpin ongoing debates about democratisation, “backsliding” and the evaluation of democracy generally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)297-316
Number of pages20
JournalEast European Politics
Volume34
Issue number3
Early online date8 Jun 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

democratization
democracy
methodology
evaluation
Serbia
Bulgaria
deliberation
neglect

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in
East European Politics on 08/06/18, available
online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/21599165.2018.1482213

Keywords

  • backsliding
  • Bulgaria
  • Democracy measurement
  • democratic consolidation
  • ethnography
  • Serbia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Development
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

“Everyday Democracy” : an ethnographic methodology for the evaluation of (de-) democratisation. / Dawson, James.

In: East European Politics, Vol. 34, No. 3, 2018, p. 297-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8a2d3ad2f86246cca4f179770afcc2e9,
title = "“Everyday Democracy”: an ethnographic methodology for the evaluation of (de-) democratisation",
abstract = "Comparative democracy indices such as Freedom House Nations in Transit underpin many scholars’ perceptions of democratic progress and backsliding. However, these fail to account empirically for practices of deliberation, a central concern in contemporary democratic theory. They also fail to address the ideational nature of emergent global challenges to democracy. This article addresses these domains of empirical neglect by presenting an “Everyday Democracy” approach to democracy evaluation, an ethnographic methodology rooted in an engagement with democratic theory. Data collected in Serbia and Bulgaria is contrasted, revealing a more vibrant and contested public sphere in Serbia, which is usually graded as less democratic. This finding highlights the need for a reassessment of some assumptions that underpin ongoing debates about democratisation, “backsliding” and the evaluation of democracy generally.",
keywords = "backsliding, Bulgaria, Democracy measurement, democratic consolidation, ethnography, Serbia",
author = "James Dawson",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in East European Politics on 08/06/18, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/21599165.2018.1482213",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/21599165.2018.1482213",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "297--316",
journal = "East European Politics",
issn = "2159-9165",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Everyday Democracy”

T2 - an ethnographic methodology for the evaluation of (de-) democratisation

AU - Dawson, James

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in East European Politics on 08/06/18, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/21599165.2018.1482213

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Comparative democracy indices such as Freedom House Nations in Transit underpin many scholars’ perceptions of democratic progress and backsliding. However, these fail to account empirically for practices of deliberation, a central concern in contemporary democratic theory. They also fail to address the ideational nature of emergent global challenges to democracy. This article addresses these domains of empirical neglect by presenting an “Everyday Democracy” approach to democracy evaluation, an ethnographic methodology rooted in an engagement with democratic theory. Data collected in Serbia and Bulgaria is contrasted, revealing a more vibrant and contested public sphere in Serbia, which is usually graded as less democratic. This finding highlights the need for a reassessment of some assumptions that underpin ongoing debates about democratisation, “backsliding” and the evaluation of democracy generally.

AB - Comparative democracy indices such as Freedom House Nations in Transit underpin many scholars’ perceptions of democratic progress and backsliding. However, these fail to account empirically for practices of deliberation, a central concern in contemporary democratic theory. They also fail to address the ideational nature of emergent global challenges to democracy. This article addresses these domains of empirical neglect by presenting an “Everyday Democracy” approach to democracy evaluation, an ethnographic methodology rooted in an engagement with democratic theory. Data collected in Serbia and Bulgaria is contrasted, revealing a more vibrant and contested public sphere in Serbia, which is usually graded as less democratic. This finding highlights the need for a reassessment of some assumptions that underpin ongoing debates about democratisation, “backsliding” and the evaluation of democracy generally.

KW - backsliding

KW - Bulgaria

KW - Democracy measurement

KW - democratic consolidation

KW - ethnography

KW - Serbia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048192627&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/21599165.2018.1482213

DO - 10.1080/21599165.2018.1482213

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 297

EP - 316

JO - East European Politics

JF - East European Politics

SN - 2159-9165

IS - 3

ER -