Evaluating market-segmentation research priorities: Targeting re-emancipation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Set against a transforming social and economic climate, this empirical study reignites debate about the degree to which theory and practice priorities are aligned in the academic market-segmentation research agenda. Results from an online survey of academics researching and publishing in the marketsegmentation field suggest little change in the scope or content of these priorities in the past 30 years. This reopens discussion about the slowly changing nature of the segmentation research agenda and raises questions about the ways in which research priorities are shaped by the external environment. The findings further suggest that the conflicting nature of academic and practitioner requirements is a barrier to opportunities for a successful academic/practitioner interface. We conclude that the segmentation research agenda has become too narrow, outlining the need to broaden debate and re-emancipate this important field of research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1239-1255
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Marketing Management
Volume26
Issue number13-14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 6 Dec 2010

Fingerprint

Emancipation
Research priorities
Market segmentation
Research agenda
Targeting
Segmentation
External environment
Climate
Economics
Empirical study
Online survey

Keywords

  • market segmentation, research priorities, environmental change, managerial relevance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Marketing
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Evaluating market-segmentation research priorities : Targeting re-emancipation. / Quinn, Lee; Dibb, Sally.

In: Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 26, No. 13-14, 06.12.2010, p. 1239-1255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8450ad8cd484448cbea78920021b2c50,
title = "Evaluating market-segmentation research priorities: Targeting re-emancipation",
abstract = "Set against a transforming social and economic climate, this empirical study reignites debate about the degree to which theory and practice priorities are aligned in the academic market-segmentation research agenda. Results from an online survey of academics researching and publishing in the marketsegmentation field suggest little change in the scope or content of these priorities in the past 30 years. This reopens discussion about the slowly changing nature of the segmentation research agenda and raises questions about the ways in which research priorities are shaped by the external environment. The findings further suggest that the conflicting nature of academic and practitioner requirements is a barrier to opportunities for a successful academic/practitioner interface. We conclude that the segmentation research agenda has become too narrow, outlining the need to broaden debate and re-emancipate this important field of research.",
keywords = "market segmentation, research priorities, environmental change, managerial relevance",
author = "Lee Quinn and Sally Dibb",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "6",
doi = "10.1080/0267257X.2010.523010",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "1239--1255",
journal = "Journal of Marketing Management",
issn = "0267-257X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "13-14",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluating market-segmentation research priorities

T2 - Targeting re-emancipation

AU - Quinn, Lee

AU - Dibb, Sally

PY - 2010/12/6

Y1 - 2010/12/6

N2 - Set against a transforming social and economic climate, this empirical study reignites debate about the degree to which theory and practice priorities are aligned in the academic market-segmentation research agenda. Results from an online survey of academics researching and publishing in the marketsegmentation field suggest little change in the scope or content of these priorities in the past 30 years. This reopens discussion about the slowly changing nature of the segmentation research agenda and raises questions about the ways in which research priorities are shaped by the external environment. The findings further suggest that the conflicting nature of academic and practitioner requirements is a barrier to opportunities for a successful academic/practitioner interface. We conclude that the segmentation research agenda has become too narrow, outlining the need to broaden debate and re-emancipate this important field of research.

AB - Set against a transforming social and economic climate, this empirical study reignites debate about the degree to which theory and practice priorities are aligned in the academic market-segmentation research agenda. Results from an online survey of academics researching and publishing in the marketsegmentation field suggest little change in the scope or content of these priorities in the past 30 years. This reopens discussion about the slowly changing nature of the segmentation research agenda and raises questions about the ways in which research priorities are shaped by the external environment. The findings further suggest that the conflicting nature of academic and practitioner requirements is a barrier to opportunities for a successful academic/practitioner interface. We conclude that the segmentation research agenda has become too narrow, outlining the need to broaden debate and re-emancipate this important field of research.

KW - market segmentation, research priorities, environmental change, managerial relevance

U2 - 10.1080/0267257X.2010.523010

DO - 10.1080/0267257X.2010.523010

M3 - Article

VL - 26

SP - 1239

EP - 1255

JO - Journal of Marketing Management

JF - Journal of Marketing Management

SN - 0267-257X

IS - 13-14

ER -