EU v the US: An Analysis of the Laws on Refusal to Supply Essential Facilities - The Google Case

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Compares the EU and US approaches towards the refusal to supply essential facilities as a potential abuse of dominance contrary to either TFEU art.102 or the Sherman Act 1890 s.2. Discusses how the differences are illustrated by the US response to the European Commission investigation into an alleged infringement of art.102 by Google Inc by means of a systematic favouring of its products over those of competitors in its search engine results.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)413-417
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Competition Law Review
Volume 37
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'EU v the US: An Analysis of the Laws on Refusal to Supply Essential Facilities - The Google Case'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this