Abstract
Compares the EU and US approaches towards the refusal to supply essential facilities as a potential abuse of dominance contrary to either TFEU art.102 or the Sherman Act 1890 s.2. Discusses how the differences are illustrated by the US response to the European Commission investigation into an alleged infringement of art.102 by Google Inc by means of a systematic favouring of its products over those of competitors in its search engine results.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413-417 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | European Competition Law Review |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |