Ethnic minorities and sustainable refugee return and reintegration in Kosovo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Unprecedented levels of displacement make the return of refugees and internally displaced populations a critical challenge, with post-conflict minority return especially complex. This article investigates the return process in Kosovo to identify what supports and hinders sustainability. For nearly two decades the Government of Kosovo and international partners have supported the return of minorities displaced during the 1998–1999 conflict and March 2004 riots. We draw on interviews with all major stakeholder groups in return programming and on indicative survey data from 499 returnees. Using a framework adapted from Black, Koser and Munk (‘Understanding Voluntary Return’), we focus on the Kosovo return process in recent years. The survey results indicate some sustainability but high differentiation in returnees’ satisfaction. This warrants concern, as differences in returnee perspectives run along already conflictual ethnic and spatial fault lines. In post-conflict settings, sustainable return and reintegration require more than the provision of services–they require nuanced understanding of how the shadow of conflict shapes returnee experiences. Finally, we question the orthodoxy of return discourse and highlight critical factors to support sustainable return elsewhere.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)403-425
Number of pages23
JournalConflict, Security and Development
Volume19
Issue number4
Early online date23 Jul 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Fingerprint

reintegration
Kosovo
national minority
refugee
sustainability
minority
programming
stakeholder
discourse
interview
experience
Group

Keywords

  • Kosovo
  • Refugee return
  • durable solution
  • minority return
  • sustainable return

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

Ethnic minorities and sustainable refugee return and reintegration in Kosovo. / Ozerdem, Alpaslan; Payne, Laura.

In: Conflict, Security and Development, Vol. 19, No. 4, 2019, p. 403-425.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e2651a956810467eb9651ff2110e5997,
title = "Ethnic minorities and sustainable refugee return and reintegration in Kosovo",
abstract = "Unprecedented levels of displacement make the return of refugees and internally displaced populations a critical challenge, with post-conflict minority return especially complex. This article investigates the return process in Kosovo to identify what supports and hinders sustainability. For nearly two decades the Government of Kosovo and international partners have supported the return of minorities displaced during the 1998–1999 conflict and March 2004 riots. We draw on interviews with all major stakeholder groups in return programming and on indicative survey data from 499 returnees. Using a framework adapted from Black, Koser and Munk (‘Understanding Voluntary Return’), we focus on the Kosovo return process in recent years. The survey results indicate some sustainability but high differentiation in returnees’ satisfaction. This warrants concern, as differences in returnee perspectives run along already conflictual ethnic and spatial fault lines. In post-conflict settings, sustainable return and reintegration require more than the provision of services–they require nuanced understanding of how the shadow of conflict shapes returnee experiences. Finally, we question the orthodoxy of return discourse and highlight critical factors to support sustainable return elsewhere.",
keywords = "Kosovo, Refugee return, durable solution, minority return, sustainable return",
author = "Alpaslan Ozerdem and Laura Payne",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/14678802.2019.1631601",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "403--425",
journal = "Conflict, Security and Development",
issn = "1467-8802",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ethnic minorities and sustainable refugee return and reintegration in Kosovo

AU - Ozerdem, Alpaslan

AU - Payne, Laura

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Unprecedented levels of displacement make the return of refugees and internally displaced populations a critical challenge, with post-conflict minority return especially complex. This article investigates the return process in Kosovo to identify what supports and hinders sustainability. For nearly two decades the Government of Kosovo and international partners have supported the return of minorities displaced during the 1998–1999 conflict and March 2004 riots. We draw on interviews with all major stakeholder groups in return programming and on indicative survey data from 499 returnees. Using a framework adapted from Black, Koser and Munk (‘Understanding Voluntary Return’), we focus on the Kosovo return process in recent years. The survey results indicate some sustainability but high differentiation in returnees’ satisfaction. This warrants concern, as differences in returnee perspectives run along already conflictual ethnic and spatial fault lines. In post-conflict settings, sustainable return and reintegration require more than the provision of services–they require nuanced understanding of how the shadow of conflict shapes returnee experiences. Finally, we question the orthodoxy of return discourse and highlight critical factors to support sustainable return elsewhere.

AB - Unprecedented levels of displacement make the return of refugees and internally displaced populations a critical challenge, with post-conflict minority return especially complex. This article investigates the return process in Kosovo to identify what supports and hinders sustainability. For nearly two decades the Government of Kosovo and international partners have supported the return of minorities displaced during the 1998–1999 conflict and March 2004 riots. We draw on interviews with all major stakeholder groups in return programming and on indicative survey data from 499 returnees. Using a framework adapted from Black, Koser and Munk (‘Understanding Voluntary Return’), we focus on the Kosovo return process in recent years. The survey results indicate some sustainability but high differentiation in returnees’ satisfaction. This warrants concern, as differences in returnee perspectives run along already conflictual ethnic and spatial fault lines. In post-conflict settings, sustainable return and reintegration require more than the provision of services–they require nuanced understanding of how the shadow of conflict shapes returnee experiences. Finally, we question the orthodoxy of return discourse and highlight critical factors to support sustainable return elsewhere.

KW - Kosovo

KW - Refugee return

KW - durable solution

KW - minority return

KW - sustainable return

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071067706&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14678802.2019.1631601

DO - 10.1080/14678802.2019.1631601

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 403

EP - 425

JO - Conflict, Security and Development

JF - Conflict, Security and Development

SN - 1467-8802

IS - 4

ER -