Estimation of mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods

D. Zheng; A. Murray

doi:10.1109/CIC.2008.4749198

Estimation of mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods

D. Zheng, A. Murray

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

58 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to estimate mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods. Ten healthy subjects were studied with three repeat blood pressure measurements. Manual systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were obtained by two trained observers. During the measurement the oscillometric cuff pressure waveform was recorded digitally. The cuff pressure corresponding to the largest oscillometric pulse pressure was taken as the mean arterial pressure (MAP). MAP was also estimated from manual DBP plus one third the pressure change from DBP to SBP. Blood pressure measurement variability and the difference between automated and manual MAP were quantified. The overall coefficients of variability for manual SBP and DBP were 2.2% and 4.5%. Corresponding values for manual and automated MAP were 3.1% and 3.7%. The automated MAP, as a percentage of the difference between manual DBP and SBP was 28plusmn14% (mean plusmn SD), which was lower than the classically assumed mean value of 33%. In conclusion, the relationship between MAP and SBP and DBP is complex with a large between-subject SD variability of 14%.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Computers in Cardiology
Publisher	IEEE
Pages	941−944
Number of pages	4
Volume	35
ISBN (Print)	978-1-4244-3706-1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/CIC.2008.4749198
Publication status	Published - 2008
Externally published	Yes
Event	36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference - Park City, United States Duration: 13 Sept 2009 → 16 Sept 2009

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)	0276-6574
ISSN (Electronic)	2325-8853

Conference

Conference	36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference
Country/Territory	United States
City	Park City
Period	13/09/09 → 16/09/09

Bibliographical note

Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution
License 3.0 (CCAL).

Since volume 33 (2006), CinC has been an open-access publication, in which copyright in each article is held by its authors, who grant permission to copy and redistribute their work with attribution, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

Access to Document

10.1109/CIC.2008.4749198

PublishedFinal published version, 1.08 MBLicence: CC BY

Cite this

@inproceedings{b65af963b13c49d2813fd08a783d1d29,

title = "Estimation of mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods",

abstract = "The aim of this study was to estimate mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods. Ten healthy subjects were studied with three repeat blood pressure measurements. Manual systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were obtained by two trained observers. During the measurement the oscillometric cuff pressure waveform was recorded digitally. The cuff pressure corresponding to the largest oscillometric pulse pressure was taken as the mean arterial pressure (MAP). MAP was also estimated from manual DBP plus one third the pressure change from DBP to SBP. Blood pressure measurement variability and the difference between automated and manual MAP were quantified. The overall coefficients of variability for manual SBP and DBP were 2.2% and 4.5%. Corresponding values for manual and automated MAP were 3.1% and 3.7%. The automated MAP, as a percentage of the difference between manual DBP and SBP was 28plusmn14% (mean plusmn SD), which was lower than the classically assumed mean value of 33%. In conclusion, the relationship between MAP and SBP and DBP is complex with a large between-subject SD variability of 14%.",

author = "D. Zheng and A. Murray",

note = "Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CCAL). Since volume 33 (2006), CinC has been an open-access publication, in which copyright in each article is held by its authors, who grant permission to copy and redistribute their work with attribution, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. ; 36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference ; Conference date: 13-09-2009 Through 16-09-2009",

year = "2008",

doi = "10.1109/CIC.2008.4749198",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-4244-3706-1",

volume = "35",

publisher = "IEEE",

pages = "941−944",

booktitle = "Computers in Cardiology",

address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Estimation of mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods

AU - Zheng, D.

AU - Murray, A.

N1 - Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CCAL). Since volume 33 (2006), CinC has been an open-access publication, in which copyright in each article is held by its authors, who grant permission to copy and redistribute their work with attribution, under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - The aim of this study was to estimate mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods. Ten healthy subjects were studied with three repeat blood pressure measurements. Manual systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were obtained by two trained observers. During the measurement the oscillometric cuff pressure waveform was recorded digitally. The cuff pressure corresponding to the largest oscillometric pulse pressure was taken as the mean arterial pressure (MAP). MAP was also estimated from manual DBP plus one third the pressure change from DBP to SBP. Blood pressure measurement variability and the difference between automated and manual MAP were quantified. The overall coefficients of variability for manual SBP and DBP were 2.2% and 4.5%. Corresponding values for manual and automated MAP were 3.1% and 3.7%. The automated MAP, as a percentage of the difference between manual DBP and SBP was 28plusmn14% (mean plusmn SD), which was lower than the classically assumed mean value of 33%. In conclusion, the relationship between MAP and SBP and DBP is complex with a large between-subject SD variability of 14%.

AB - The aim of this study was to estimate mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods. Ten healthy subjects were studied with three repeat blood pressure measurements. Manual systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP) were obtained by two trained observers. During the measurement the oscillometric cuff pressure waveform was recorded digitally. The cuff pressure corresponding to the largest oscillometric pulse pressure was taken as the mean arterial pressure (MAP). MAP was also estimated from manual DBP plus one third the pressure change from DBP to SBP. Blood pressure measurement variability and the difference between automated and manual MAP were quantified. The overall coefficients of variability for manual SBP and DBP were 2.2% and 4.5%. Corresponding values for manual and automated MAP were 3.1% and 3.7%. The automated MAP, as a percentage of the difference between manual DBP and SBP was 28plusmn14% (mean plusmn SD), which was lower than the classically assumed mean value of 33%. In conclusion, the relationship between MAP and SBP and DBP is complex with a large between-subject SD variability of 14%.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-62249162195&partnerID=MN8TOARS

UR - http://www.cinc.org/cinc-papers-on-line/

U2 - 10.1109/CIC.2008.4749198

DO - 10.1109/CIC.2008.4749198

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 978-1-4244-3706-1

VL - 35

SP - 941−944

BT - Computers in Cardiology

PB - IEEE

T2 - 36th Annual Computers in Cardiology Conference

Y2 - 13 September 2009 through 16 September 2009

ER -

Estimation of mean blood pressure from oscillometric and manual methods

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this