Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator

Louise Moody; Alan Waterworth; John G. Arthur; Aleksandar Zivanovic; Edward Dibble

doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241

Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator

Louise Moody, Alan Waterworth, John G. Arthur, Aleksandar Zivanovic, Edward Dibble

School of Art and Design

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

There is limited research considering the usability of medical virtual environments. Usability evaluation is an essential validation phase that considers the extent to which a product achieves its specific goals, with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. A four-stage iterative approach is adopted to enhance usability in the development of a knee arthroscopy training system. This process has drawn attention to issues that may impede system usability for example non-conformity to platform conventions, and visibility of the system status. The process highlights features that computer scientists can overlook when working closely with a system but that are essential to user acceptance and effective application.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12
Subtitle of host publication	Building a Better You: The Next Tools for Medical Education, Diagnosis and Care
Pages	241-243
Number of pages	3
Volume	98
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241
Publication status	Published - 2004
Event	4th Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 1996 - Newport Beach, United States Duration: 15 Jan 2004 → 16 Jan 2004 Conference number: 4

Conference

Conference	4th Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 1996
Abbreviated title	MMVR 1996
Country/Territory	United States
City	Newport Beach
Period	15/01/04 → 16/01/04

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Biomedical Engineering
Health Informatics
Health Information Management

Access to Document

10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241

Cite this

Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator. / Moody, Louise; Waterworth, Alan; Arthur, John G.; Zivanovic, Aleksandar; Dibble, Edward.

Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12 : Building a Better You: The Next Tools for Medical Education, Diagnosis and Care. Vol. 98 2004. p. 241-243.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

Moody, L, Waterworth, A, Arthur, JG, Zivanovic, A & Dibble, E 2004, Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator. in Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12 : Building a Better You: The Next Tools for Medical Education, Diagnosis and Care. vol. 98, pp. 241-243, 4th Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 1996, Newport Beach, California, United States, 15/01/04. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241

@inproceedings{c43860a3e2424cf3ab34b80511e8e49b,

title = "Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator",

abstract = "There is limited research considering the usability of medical virtual environments. Usability evaluation is an essential validation phase that considers the extent to which a product achieves its specific goals, with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. A four-stage iterative approach is adopted to enhance usability in the development of a knee arthroscopy training system. This process has drawn attention to issues that may impede system usability for example non-conformity to platform conventions, and visibility of the system status. The process highlights features that computer scientists can overlook when working closely with a system but that are essential to user acceptance and effective application.",

author = "Louise Moody and Alan Waterworth and Arthur, {John G.} and Aleksandar Zivanovic and Edward Dibble",

year = "2004",

doi = "10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241",

language = "English",

isbn = "1586034049",

volume = "98",

pages = "241--243",

booktitle = "Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12",

note = "4th Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 1996, MMVR 1996 ; Conference date: 15-01-2004 Through 16-01-2004",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator

AU - Moody, Louise

AU - Waterworth, Alan

AU - Arthur, John G.

AU - Zivanovic, Aleksandar

AU - Dibble, Edward

N1 - Conference code: 4

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - There is limited research considering the usability of medical virtual environments. Usability evaluation is an essential validation phase that considers the extent to which a product achieves its specific goals, with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. A four-stage iterative approach is adopted to enhance usability in the development of a knee arthroscopy training system. This process has drawn attention to issues that may impede system usability for example non-conformity to platform conventions, and visibility of the system status. The process highlights features that computer scientists can overlook when working closely with a system but that are essential to user acceptance and effective application.

AB - There is limited research considering the usability of medical virtual environments. Usability evaluation is an essential validation phase that considers the extent to which a product achieves its specific goals, with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. A four-stage iterative approach is adopted to enhance usability in the development of a knee arthroscopy training system. This process has drawn attention to issues that may impede system usability for example non-conformity to platform conventions, and visibility of the system status. The process highlights features that computer scientists can overlook when working closely with a system but that are essential to user acceptance and effective application.

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241

DO - 10.3233/978-1-60750-942-4-241

M3 - Conference proceeding

C2 - 2004199973

AN - SCOPUS:16544380631

SN - 1586034049

SN - 9781586034047

VL - 98

SP - 241

EP - 243

BT - Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 12

T2 - 4th Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 1996

Y2 - 15 January 2004 through 16 January 2004

ER -

Ensuring the usability of a knee arthroscopy simulator

Abstract

Conference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this