Eliminating Rivals, Managing Rivalries: A Comparison of Robert Mugabe and Kenneth Kaunda

Stephen McLoughlin, Maartje Weerdesteijn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Downloads (Pure)


This article seeks to explore the role that leadership plays in both the perpetration and avoidance of mass atrocities. Many scholars have argued that leadership is pivotal to the outbreak of such violence but there is almost no scholarship which explores the role that political leaders play in mitigating or aggravating the risk of atrocities over time. Why is it that mass atrocities occur in some places but not in others, despite the existence of similar risk factors? By conducting a comparative analysis of Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe and Kenneth Kaunda of Zambia, this paper investigates the impact that the strategies of each leader had on the risk of mass atrocities. Both countries share similar colonial backgrounds, and display comparable structural risk factors commonly associated with genocide and other mass atrocities. Both Kaunda and Mugabe were key leaders in their countries’ liberation struggles, and both leaders played pivotal roles during the crucial formative years of independence. Yet the two countries have taken dramatically different paths – while Zambia has remained relatively stable and peaceful, Zimbabwe has experience mass violence and repression.
Original languageEnglish
Article number10
Pages (from-to)116-136
Number of pages21
JournalGenocide Studies and Prevention
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 24 Feb 2016
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal


  • Robert Mugabe
  • Kenneth Kaunda
  • leadership
  • structural risk factors


Dive into the research topics of 'Eliminating Rivals, Managing Rivalries: A Comparison of Robert Mugabe and Kenneth Kaunda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this