Electronic Monitoring and Monitoring Probation- the case of Ireland

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Set against an environment of diverse reforms across the domestic criminal justice system, including new oversight arrangements, the current article considers how probation in Ireland has almost entirely escaped notice. A case for probation oversight is made on the basis of its caseload size but also a decade of unaccounted use of electronic monitoring (EM). Global EM use highlights questions about domestic probation standards, research and planning. Shortcomings within the legislative consultation process around the tool’s role, the lack of any evaluation of EM suppliers and increasing focus on data management to date also bolster a case for oversight of Irish probation. A principal issue within this set of challenges for probation is how EM might adjust traditional agency values. Overall, the contention is made that the assumed exceptionalism of Éire’s criminal justice system, that which acts as a buffer to change, including creeping severity in criminal justice models evident elsewhere, may no longer be valid.
LanguageEnglish
Pages120-135
Number of pages16
JournalEuropean Journal of Probation
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

probation
Ireland
electronics
monitoring
justice
supplier
reform
planning
lack
evaluation
management
Values

Cite this

Electronic Monitoring and Monitoring Probation- the case of Ireland. / Moss, Brian.

In: European Journal of Probation, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.08.2018, p. 120-135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ee8d13e96e634d3095cae2a2cbec092f,
title = "Electronic Monitoring and Monitoring Probation- the case of Ireland",
abstract = "Set against an environment of diverse reforms across the domestic criminal justice system, including new oversight arrangements, the current article considers how probation in Ireland has almost entirely escaped notice. A case for probation oversight is made on the basis of its caseload size but also a decade of unaccounted use of electronic monitoring (EM). Global EM use highlights questions about domestic probation standards, research and planning. Shortcomings within the legislative consultation process around the tool’s role, the lack of any evaluation of EM suppliers and increasing focus on data management to date also bolster a case for oversight of Irish probation. A principal issue within this set of challenges for probation is how EM might adjust traditional agency values. Overall, the contention is made that the assumed exceptionalism of {\'E}ire’s criminal justice system, that which acts as a buffer to change, including creeping severity in criminal justice models evident elsewhere, may no longer be valid.",
author = "Brian Moss",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/2066220318792067",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "120--135",
journal = "European Journal of Probation",
issn = "2066-2203",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electronic Monitoring and Monitoring Probation- the case of Ireland

AU - Moss, Brian

PY - 2018/8/1

Y1 - 2018/8/1

N2 - Set against an environment of diverse reforms across the domestic criminal justice system, including new oversight arrangements, the current article considers how probation in Ireland has almost entirely escaped notice. A case for probation oversight is made on the basis of its caseload size but also a decade of unaccounted use of electronic monitoring (EM). Global EM use highlights questions about domestic probation standards, research and planning. Shortcomings within the legislative consultation process around the tool’s role, the lack of any evaluation of EM suppliers and increasing focus on data management to date also bolster a case for oversight of Irish probation. A principal issue within this set of challenges for probation is how EM might adjust traditional agency values. Overall, the contention is made that the assumed exceptionalism of Éire’s criminal justice system, that which acts as a buffer to change, including creeping severity in criminal justice models evident elsewhere, may no longer be valid.

AB - Set against an environment of diverse reforms across the domestic criminal justice system, including new oversight arrangements, the current article considers how probation in Ireland has almost entirely escaped notice. A case for probation oversight is made on the basis of its caseload size but also a decade of unaccounted use of electronic monitoring (EM). Global EM use highlights questions about domestic probation standards, research and planning. Shortcomings within the legislative consultation process around the tool’s role, the lack of any evaluation of EM suppliers and increasing focus on data management to date also bolster a case for oversight of Irish probation. A principal issue within this set of challenges for probation is how EM might adjust traditional agency values. Overall, the contention is made that the assumed exceptionalism of Éire’s criminal justice system, that which acts as a buffer to change, including creeping severity in criminal justice models evident elsewhere, may no longer be valid.

U2 - 10.1177/2066220318792067

DO - 10.1177/2066220318792067

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 120

EP - 135

JO - European Journal of Probation

T2 - European Journal of Probation

JF - European Journal of Probation

SN - 2066-2203

IS - 2

ER -