Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: A randomised controlled trial

Peter J. Hatcher, Charles Hulme, Jeremy N V Miles, Julia M. Carroll, Janet Hatcher, Simon Gibbs, Glynnis Smith, Claudine Bowyer-Crane, Margaret J. Snowling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention for reading-delayed children in Year-1 classes. Methods: A sample (N = 77) of children drawn from 14 schools representing those with the weakest reading skills were randomly allocated to one of two groups. A 20-week intervention group received the intervention for two consecutive 10-week periods, while a 10-week intervention group only received the intervention for the second 10 weeks of the study. The programme was delivered in daily 20-minute sessions that alternated between small group ( N = 3) and individual teaching. The programme combined phoneme awareness training, word and text reading, and phonological linkage exercises. Results: The children receiving the intervention during the first 10-week period made significantly more progress on measures of letter knowledge, single word reading, and phoneme awareness than children not receiving the intervention. However, the children who only received the intervention during the second 10-week period made rapid progress and appeared to catch up with the children who had been given the more prolonged intervention. Failure to respond to the intervention was predicted by poor initial literacy skills and being in receipt of free school meals. Conclusions: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)820-827
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
Volume47
Issue number8
Early online date31 Oct 2005
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Reading
Randomized Controlled Trials
Teaching
Meals
Exercise

Keywords

  • Randomised controlled trial
  • Reading difficulties
  • Reading intervention
  • Remedial teaching

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay : A randomised controlled trial. / Hatcher, Peter J.; Hulme, Charles; Miles, Jeremy N V; Carroll, Julia M.; Hatcher, Janet; Gibbs, Simon; Smith, Glynnis; Bowyer-Crane, Claudine; Snowling, Margaret J.

In: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, Vol. 47, No. 8, 08.2006, p. 820-827.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hatcher, Peter J. ; Hulme, Charles ; Miles, Jeremy N V ; Carroll, Julia M. ; Hatcher, Janet ; Gibbs, Simon ; Smith, Glynnis ; Bowyer-Crane, Claudine ; Snowling, Margaret J. / Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay : A randomised controlled trial. In: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. 2006 ; Vol. 47, No. 8. pp. 820-827.
@article{43b583d60c1c4e618c4f60e5a4d9f591,
title = "Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay: A randomised controlled trial",
abstract = "Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention for reading-delayed children in Year-1 classes. Methods: A sample (N = 77) of children drawn from 14 schools representing those with the weakest reading skills were randomly allocated to one of two groups. A 20-week intervention group received the intervention for two consecutive 10-week periods, while a 10-week intervention group only received the intervention for the second 10 weeks of the study. The programme was delivered in daily 20-minute sessions that alternated between small group ( N = 3) and individual teaching. The programme combined phoneme awareness training, word and text reading, and phonological linkage exercises. Results: The children receiving the intervention during the first 10-week period made significantly more progress on measures of letter knowledge, single word reading, and phoneme awareness than children not receiving the intervention. However, the children who only received the intervention during the second 10-week period made rapid progress and appeared to catch up with the children who had been given the more prolonged intervention. Failure to respond to the intervention was predicted by poor initial literacy skills and being in receipt of free school meals. Conclusions: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.",
keywords = "Randomised controlled trial, Reading difficulties, Reading intervention, Remedial teaching",
author = "Hatcher, {Peter J.} and Charles Hulme and Miles, {Jeremy N V} and Carroll, {Julia M.} and Janet Hatcher and Simon Gibbs and Glynnis Smith and Claudine Bowyer-Crane and Snowling, {Margaret J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x",
language = "English",
volume = "47",
pages = "820--827",
journal = "Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry",
issn = "0021-9630",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading-delay

T2 - A randomised controlled trial

AU - Hatcher, Peter J.

AU - Hulme, Charles

AU - Miles, Jeremy N V

AU - Carroll, Julia M.

AU - Hatcher, Janet

AU - Gibbs, Simon

AU - Smith, Glynnis

AU - Bowyer-Crane, Claudine

AU - Snowling, Margaret J.

PY - 2006/8

Y1 - 2006/8

N2 - Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention for reading-delayed children in Year-1 classes. Methods: A sample (N = 77) of children drawn from 14 schools representing those with the weakest reading skills were randomly allocated to one of two groups. A 20-week intervention group received the intervention for two consecutive 10-week periods, while a 10-week intervention group only received the intervention for the second 10 weeks of the study. The programme was delivered in daily 20-minute sessions that alternated between small group ( N = 3) and individual teaching. The programme combined phoneme awareness training, word and text reading, and phonological linkage exercises. Results: The children receiving the intervention during the first 10-week period made significantly more progress on measures of letter knowledge, single word reading, and phoneme awareness than children not receiving the intervention. However, the children who only received the intervention during the second 10-week period made rapid progress and appeared to catch up with the children who had been given the more prolonged intervention. Failure to respond to the intervention was predicted by poor initial literacy skills and being in receipt of free school meals. Conclusions: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.

AB - Background: This study evaluated the effectiveness of an intervention for reading-delayed children in Year-1 classes. Methods: A sample (N = 77) of children drawn from 14 schools representing those with the weakest reading skills were randomly allocated to one of two groups. A 20-week intervention group received the intervention for two consecutive 10-week periods, while a 10-week intervention group only received the intervention for the second 10 weeks of the study. The programme was delivered in daily 20-minute sessions that alternated between small group ( N = 3) and individual teaching. The programme combined phoneme awareness training, word and text reading, and phonological linkage exercises. Results: The children receiving the intervention during the first 10-week period made significantly more progress on measures of letter knowledge, single word reading, and phoneme awareness than children not receiving the intervention. However, the children who only received the intervention during the second 10-week period made rapid progress and appeared to catch up with the children who had been given the more prolonged intervention. Failure to respond to the intervention was predicted by poor initial literacy skills and being in receipt of free school meals. Conclusions: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.

KW - Randomised controlled trial

KW - Reading difficulties

KW - Reading intervention

KW - Remedial teaching

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746126113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 820

EP - 827

JO - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

SN - 0021-9630

IS - 8

ER -