Effects of lying in practical Turing tests

Kevin Warwick, Huma Shah

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Interpretation of utterances affects an interrogator’s determination of human from machine during live Turing tests. Here, we consider transcripts realised as a result of a series of practical Turing tests that were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. The focus in this paper is to consider the effects of lying and truth-telling on the human judges by the hidden entities, whether human or a machine. Turing test transcripts provide a glimpse into short text communication, the type that occurs in emails: how does the reader determine truth from the content of a stranger’s textual message? Different types of lying in the conversations are explored, and the judge’s attribution of human or machine is investigated in each test.
Original languageEnglish
JournalAI and Society
VolumeJanuary
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2014

Fingerprint

Communication
Turing Test
England
Truth-telling
Reader
Utterance
Attribution
Stranger
Entity

Bibliographical note

This article is not available on the repository

Keywords

  • Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics)
  • Computer Science
  • general
  • Engineering Economics
  • Organization
  • Logistics
  • Marketing
  • Control
  • Robotics
  • Mechatronics
  • Performing Arts
  • Methodology of the Social Sciences

Cite this

Effects of lying in practical Turing tests. / Warwick, Kevin; Shah, Huma.

In: AI and Society, Vol. January, 01.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Warwick, K & Shah, H 2014, 'Effects of lying in practical Turing tests' AI and Society, vol. January. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0534-3
Warwick K, Shah H. Effects of lying in practical Turing tests. AI and Society. 2014 Jan;January. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-013-0534-3
Warwick, Kevin ; Shah, Huma. / Effects of lying in practical Turing tests. In: AI and Society. 2014 ; Vol. January.
@article{2999c6b8c0c64ead8a50661e81e8f391,
title = "Effects of lying in practical Turing tests",
abstract = "Interpretation of utterances affects an interrogator’s determination of human from machine during live Turing tests. Here, we consider transcripts realised as a result of a series of practical Turing tests that were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. The focus in this paper is to consider the effects of lying and truth-telling on the human judges by the hidden entities, whether human or a machine. Turing test transcripts provide a glimpse into short text communication, the type that occurs in emails: how does the reader determine truth from the content of a stranger’s textual message? Different types of lying in the conversations are explored, and the judge’s attribution of human or machine is investigated in each test.",
keywords = "Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics), Computer Science, general, Engineering Economics, Organization, Logistics, Marketing, Control, Robotics, Mechatronics, Performing Arts, Methodology of the Social Sciences",
author = "Kevin Warwick and Huma Shah",
note = "This article is not available on the repository",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00146-013-0534-3",
language = "English",
volume = "January",
journal = "AI & Society",
issn = "0951-5666",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of lying in practical Turing tests

AU - Warwick, Kevin

AU - Shah, Huma

N1 - This article is not available on the repository

PY - 2014/1

Y1 - 2014/1

N2 - Interpretation of utterances affects an interrogator’s determination of human from machine during live Turing tests. Here, we consider transcripts realised as a result of a series of practical Turing tests that were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. The focus in this paper is to consider the effects of lying and truth-telling on the human judges by the hidden entities, whether human or a machine. Turing test transcripts provide a glimpse into short text communication, the type that occurs in emails: how does the reader determine truth from the content of a stranger’s textual message? Different types of lying in the conversations are explored, and the judge’s attribution of human or machine is investigated in each test.

AB - Interpretation of utterances affects an interrogator’s determination of human from machine during live Turing tests. Here, we consider transcripts realised as a result of a series of practical Turing tests that were held on 23 June 2012 at Bletchley Park, England. The focus in this paper is to consider the effects of lying and truth-telling on the human judges by the hidden entities, whether human or a machine. Turing test transcripts provide a glimpse into short text communication, the type that occurs in emails: how does the reader determine truth from the content of a stranger’s textual message? Different types of lying in the conversations are explored, and the judge’s attribution of human or machine is investigated in each test.

KW - Artificial Intelligence (incl. Robotics)

KW - Computer Science

KW - general

KW - Engineering Economics

KW - Organization

KW - Logistics

KW - Marketing

KW - Control

KW - Robotics

KW - Mechatronics

KW - Performing Arts

KW - Methodology of the Social Sciences

U2 - 10.1007/s00146-013-0534-3

DO - 10.1007/s00146-013-0534-3

M3 - Article

VL - January

JO - AI & Society

JF - AI & Society

SN - 0951-5666

ER -

Access to Document