Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Different flow meter technologies are used to monitor the output of oil and gas wells. Although flowmeter accuracy has generally improved over time, there remain substantial uncertainties, particularly in multiphase flow. These errors could potentially be greater where older meters are being used or calibration and/or maintenance is difficult. Consequently, the associated errors with the recorded data could be out of specification in such cases. One use of the well flow data is to improve parameter estimates for important characteristics of reservoirs such as porosity and permeability. Therefore any errors in flow measurement influence the results of a reservoir simulation and production forecasts. However, the impact of flow measurement errors on the forecast of oil and gas production has not been considered before. In this study, the effects of using out-of-specification errors on the predicted reservoir production have been investigated. As a test case, the simulated production results of a reservoir with known characteristics were considered to be the actual flow rate values. Then, two sets of data were generated by applying errors up to 5% and 10% , respectively, to the flow rates and the resulting values were used in a history matching exercise to modify the predictions of the simulations for the same reservoir with incorrect porosity and permeability parameters. The errors in the first and second sets of data were considered to be within and without the specification, respectively. The results show that when errors are within the specification, the corrected porosity and permeability values have less than a 2.2% and 2.5% error, which cause minor deviations of up to 2.3% in the production forecast. However, for the second set of data, when the errors are increased up to 5% more than the specification, the corrected porosity, permeability and production forecast deviate significantly up to 10.8 %, 10.1% and 12.4%, respectively, from their respective reference values.
LanguageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX
EditorsP. Vorobieff, A. Brebbia
Place of PublicationUnited Kingdom
PublisherWIT Press
Pages133-142
Number of pages10
Volume115
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-78466-196-0
ISBN (Print)978-1-78466-195-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Oct 2017

Publication series

NameWIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences
PublisherWIT Press
Volume115
ISSN (Electronic)1743-3533

Fingerprint

Flow measurement
Measurement errors
Gases
Specifications
Porosity
Flow rate
Oils
Flowmeters
Multiphase flow
Calibration

Keywords

  • flow meters
  • flow measurement errors
  • history matching
  • reservoir simulation

Cite this

Sadri, M., Shariatipour, S. M., & Hunt, A. (2017). Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast. In P. Vorobieff, & A. Brebbia (Eds.), Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX (Vol. 115, pp. 133-142). (WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences; Vol. 115). United Kingdom: WIT Press. https://doi.org/10.2495/MPF170141

Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast. / Sadri, Mahdi; Shariatipour, Seyed Mohammad; Hunt, Andrew.

Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX. ed. / P. Vorobieff; A. Brebbia. Vol. 115 United Kingdom : WIT Press, 2017. p. 133-142 (WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences; Vol. 115).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Sadri, M, Shariatipour, SM & Hunt, A 2017, Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast. in P Vorobieff & A Brebbia (eds), Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX. vol. 115, WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences, vol. 115, WIT Press, United Kingdom, pp. 133-142. https://doi.org/10.2495/MPF170141
Sadri M, Shariatipour SM, Hunt A. Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast. In Vorobieff P, Brebbia A, editors, Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX. Vol. 115. United Kingdom: WIT Press. 2017. p. 133-142. (WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences). https://doi.org/10.2495/MPF170141
Sadri, Mahdi ; Shariatipour, Seyed Mohammad ; Hunt, Andrew. / Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast. Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX. editor / P. Vorobieff ; A. Brebbia. Vol. 115 United Kingdom : WIT Press, 2017. pp. 133-142 (WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences).
@inproceedings{37c7401df195475a96b2690a391aba84,
title = "Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast",
abstract = "Different flow meter technologies are used to monitor the output of oil and gas wells. Although flowmeter accuracy has generally improved over time, there remain substantial uncertainties, particularly in multiphase flow. These errors could potentially be greater where older meters are being used or calibration and/or maintenance is difficult. Consequently, the associated errors with the recorded data could be out of specification in such cases. One use of the well flow data is to improve parameter estimates for important characteristics of reservoirs such as porosity and permeability. Therefore any errors in flow measurement influence the results of a reservoir simulation and production forecasts. However, the impact of flow measurement errors on the forecast of oil and gas production has not been considered before. In this study, the effects of using out-of-specification errors on the predicted reservoir production have been investigated. As a test case, the simulated production results of a reservoir with known characteristics were considered to be the actual flow rate values. Then, two sets of data were generated by applying errors up to 5{\%} and 10{\%} , respectively, to the flow rates and the resulting values were used in a history matching exercise to modify the predictions of the simulations for the same reservoir with incorrect porosity and permeability parameters. The errors in the first and second sets of data were considered to be within and without the specification, respectively. The results show that when errors are within the specification, the corrected porosity and permeability values have less than a 2.2{\%} and 2.5{\%} error, which cause minor deviations of up to 2.3{\%} in the production forecast. However, for the second set of data, when the errors are increased up to 5{\%} more than the specification, the corrected porosity, permeability and production forecast deviate significantly up to 10.8 {\%}, 10.1{\%} and 12.4{\%}, respectively, from their respective reference values.",
keywords = "flow meters, flow measurement errors, history matching, reservoir simulation",
author = "Mahdi Sadri and Shariatipour, {Seyed Mohammad} and Andrew Hunt",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.2495/MPF170141",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-78466-195-3",
volume = "115",
series = "WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences",
publisher = "WIT Press",
pages = "133--142",
editor = "P. Vorobieff and A. Brebbia",
booktitle = "Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Effects of Flow Measurement Errors on Oil and Gas Production Forecast

AU - Sadri, Mahdi

AU - Shariatipour, Seyed Mohammad

AU - Hunt, Andrew

PY - 2017/10/11

Y1 - 2017/10/11

N2 - Different flow meter technologies are used to monitor the output of oil and gas wells. Although flowmeter accuracy has generally improved over time, there remain substantial uncertainties, particularly in multiphase flow. These errors could potentially be greater where older meters are being used or calibration and/or maintenance is difficult. Consequently, the associated errors with the recorded data could be out of specification in such cases. One use of the well flow data is to improve parameter estimates for important characteristics of reservoirs such as porosity and permeability. Therefore any errors in flow measurement influence the results of a reservoir simulation and production forecasts. However, the impact of flow measurement errors on the forecast of oil and gas production has not been considered before. In this study, the effects of using out-of-specification errors on the predicted reservoir production have been investigated. As a test case, the simulated production results of a reservoir with known characteristics were considered to be the actual flow rate values. Then, two sets of data were generated by applying errors up to 5% and 10% , respectively, to the flow rates and the resulting values were used in a history matching exercise to modify the predictions of the simulations for the same reservoir with incorrect porosity and permeability parameters. The errors in the first and second sets of data were considered to be within and without the specification, respectively. The results show that when errors are within the specification, the corrected porosity and permeability values have less than a 2.2% and 2.5% error, which cause minor deviations of up to 2.3% in the production forecast. However, for the second set of data, when the errors are increased up to 5% more than the specification, the corrected porosity, permeability and production forecast deviate significantly up to 10.8 %, 10.1% and 12.4%, respectively, from their respective reference values.

AB - Different flow meter technologies are used to monitor the output of oil and gas wells. Although flowmeter accuracy has generally improved over time, there remain substantial uncertainties, particularly in multiphase flow. These errors could potentially be greater where older meters are being used or calibration and/or maintenance is difficult. Consequently, the associated errors with the recorded data could be out of specification in such cases. One use of the well flow data is to improve parameter estimates for important characteristics of reservoirs such as porosity and permeability. Therefore any errors in flow measurement influence the results of a reservoir simulation and production forecasts. However, the impact of flow measurement errors on the forecast of oil and gas production has not been considered before. In this study, the effects of using out-of-specification errors on the predicted reservoir production have been investigated. As a test case, the simulated production results of a reservoir with known characteristics were considered to be the actual flow rate values. Then, two sets of data were generated by applying errors up to 5% and 10% , respectively, to the flow rates and the resulting values were used in a history matching exercise to modify the predictions of the simulations for the same reservoir with incorrect porosity and permeability parameters. The errors in the first and second sets of data were considered to be within and without the specification, respectively. The results show that when errors are within the specification, the corrected porosity and permeability values have less than a 2.2% and 2.5% error, which cause minor deviations of up to 2.3% in the production forecast. However, for the second set of data, when the errors are increased up to 5% more than the specification, the corrected porosity, permeability and production forecast deviate significantly up to 10.8 %, 10.1% and 12.4%, respectively, from their respective reference values.

KW - flow meters

KW - flow measurement errors

KW - history matching

KW - reservoir simulation

U2 - 10.2495/MPF170141

DO - 10.2495/MPF170141

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 978-1-78466-195-3

VL - 115

T3 - WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences

SP - 133

EP - 142

BT - Computational & Experimental Methods in Multiphase & Complex Flow IX

A2 - Vorobieff, P.

A2 - Brebbia, A.

PB - WIT Press

CY - United Kingdom

ER -