Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement

Fan Pan, Dingchang Zheng, Alan Murray

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

When measuring blood pressure (BP) using the auscultation method, a stethoscope is commonly used. In clinical practice, it is sometimes placed under the cuff, but more usually outside the cuff on the antecubital fossa. However, there is little scientific evidence to quantify the BP difference between the BP measurements taken with the stethoscope under the cuff or outside the cuff. The aim of this study was to provide these data. Nine healthy subjects were studied, and there were two repeated measurements for each subject. Two electronic stethoscopes (one under the cuff, the other outside the cuff) were used to record the Korotkoff sounds. The signals of cuff pressure and two Korotkoff sounds were simultaneously recorded to a computer for off-line analysis. The sounds recorded from the two positions were then replayed to two operators to determine systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP). The BP difference from the two positions was finally quantified. Variance analysis showed that there was no significant BP difference (for both SBP and DBP) between the repeat measurements and between the two operators (p>0.1). There was also no significant SBP difference between results with the stethoscopes placed at the two positions (P>0.1). However, a significant difference for DBP was observed, with a mean±SD difference of -3.0±1.4 mmHg (P<;0.001). In conclusion, this study quantified the effect of stethoscope position on BP measurement.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationComputing in Cardiology
PublisherIEEE
Number of pages4
Volume40
ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4799-0886-8
ISBN (Print)978-1-4799-0884-4
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Externally publishedYes
EventComputing in Cardiology 2013 Conference - Zaragoza, Spain
Duration: 22 Sep 201325 Sep 2013

Publication series

Name
ISSN (Print)0276-6574
ISSN (Electronic)2325-8853

Conference

ConferenceComputing in Cardiology 2013 Conference
CountrySpain
CityZaragoza
Period22/09/1325/09/13

Fingerprint

blood pressure
electronics
analysis of variance

Cite this

Pan, F., Zheng, D., & Murray, A. (2013). Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement. In Computing in Cardiology (Vol. 40). IEEE.

Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement. / Pan, Fan; Zheng, Dingchang; Murray, Alan.

Computing in Cardiology. Vol. 40 IEEE, 2013.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference proceeding

Pan, F, Zheng, D & Murray, A 2013, Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement. in Computing in Cardiology. vol. 40, IEEE, Computing in Cardiology 2013 Conference, Zaragoza, Spain, 22/09/13.
Pan F, Zheng D, Murray A. Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement. In Computing in Cardiology. Vol. 40. IEEE. 2013
Pan, Fan ; Zheng, Dingchang ; Murray, Alan. / Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement. Computing in Cardiology. Vol. 40 IEEE, 2013.
@inproceedings{7f8b16f708ee4f88bf945392151b2482,
title = "Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement",
abstract = "When measuring blood pressure (BP) using the auscultation method, a stethoscope is commonly used. In clinical practice, it is sometimes placed under the cuff, but more usually outside the cuff on the antecubital fossa. However, there is little scientific evidence to quantify the BP difference between the BP measurements taken with the stethoscope under the cuff or outside the cuff. The aim of this study was to provide these data. Nine healthy subjects were studied, and there were two repeated measurements for each subject. Two electronic stethoscopes (one under the cuff, the other outside the cuff) were used to record the Korotkoff sounds. The signals of cuff pressure and two Korotkoff sounds were simultaneously recorded to a computer for off-line analysis. The sounds recorded from the two positions were then replayed to two operators to determine systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP). The BP difference from the two positions was finally quantified. Variance analysis showed that there was no significant BP difference (for both SBP and DBP) between the repeat measurements and between the two operators (p>0.1). There was also no significant SBP difference between results with the stethoscopes placed at the two positions (P>0.1). However, a significant difference for DBP was observed, with a mean±SD difference of -3.0±1.4 mmHg (P<;0.001). In conclusion, this study quantified the effect of stethoscope position on BP measurement.",
author = "Fan Pan and Dingchang Zheng and Alan Murray",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-4799-0884-4",
volume = "40",
publisher = "IEEE",
booktitle = "Computing in Cardiology",
address = "United States",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Effect of stethoscope position on auscultatory blood pressure measurement

AU - Pan, Fan

AU - Zheng, Dingchang

AU - Murray, Alan

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - When measuring blood pressure (BP) using the auscultation method, a stethoscope is commonly used. In clinical practice, it is sometimes placed under the cuff, but more usually outside the cuff on the antecubital fossa. However, there is little scientific evidence to quantify the BP difference between the BP measurements taken with the stethoscope under the cuff or outside the cuff. The aim of this study was to provide these data. Nine healthy subjects were studied, and there were two repeated measurements for each subject. Two electronic stethoscopes (one under the cuff, the other outside the cuff) were used to record the Korotkoff sounds. The signals of cuff pressure and two Korotkoff sounds were simultaneously recorded to a computer for off-line analysis. The sounds recorded from the two positions were then replayed to two operators to determine systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP). The BP difference from the two positions was finally quantified. Variance analysis showed that there was no significant BP difference (for both SBP and DBP) between the repeat measurements and between the two operators (p>0.1). There was also no significant SBP difference between results with the stethoscopes placed at the two positions (P>0.1). However, a significant difference for DBP was observed, with a mean±SD difference of -3.0±1.4 mmHg (P<;0.001). In conclusion, this study quantified the effect of stethoscope position on BP measurement.

AB - When measuring blood pressure (BP) using the auscultation method, a stethoscope is commonly used. In clinical practice, it is sometimes placed under the cuff, but more usually outside the cuff on the antecubital fossa. However, there is little scientific evidence to quantify the BP difference between the BP measurements taken with the stethoscope under the cuff or outside the cuff. The aim of this study was to provide these data. Nine healthy subjects were studied, and there were two repeated measurements for each subject. Two electronic stethoscopes (one under the cuff, the other outside the cuff) were used to record the Korotkoff sounds. The signals of cuff pressure and two Korotkoff sounds were simultaneously recorded to a computer for off-line analysis. The sounds recorded from the two positions were then replayed to two operators to determine systolic and diastolic BPs (SBP and DBP). The BP difference from the two positions was finally quantified. Variance analysis showed that there was no significant BP difference (for both SBP and DBP) between the repeat measurements and between the two operators (p>0.1). There was also no significant SBP difference between results with the stethoscopes placed at the two positions (P>0.1). However, a significant difference for DBP was observed, with a mean±SD difference of -3.0±1.4 mmHg (P<;0.001). In conclusion, this study quantified the effect of stethoscope position on BP measurement.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84894157775&partnerID=MN8TOARS

M3 - Conference proceeding

SN - 978-1-4799-0884-4

VL - 40

BT - Computing in Cardiology

PB - IEEE

ER -