Effect of different compression bandaging techniques on the healing rate of venous leg ulcers: a literature review

Emily Fulcher, Neil Gopee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Venous leg ulcers (VLUs) are a common health problem in older adults, for which the widely used method of treatment includes compression therapy. There are various compression bandages and hosiery systems available for use, but it remains unclear as to which types of compression systems are most effective in enabling healing of VLUs. This study aimed to determine which type of the two most commonly used compression bandaging (four-layer and two-layer) is more effective in providing complete ulcer healing of VLUs. Key search terms were identified using the PICO (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) model, with distinct inclusion and exclusion criteria, in a strategic search of electronic databases (e.g. CINAHL and MEDLINE) along with wider sources, including Google Scholar. More studies favoured the four-layer compression system than two-layer for providing better healing rates in the treatment of VLUs, but two-layer bandaging tends to provide a better quality of life and may be more cost-effective, although comorbidities and other factors also need to be considered. In choosing the type of compression bandage for the management of leg ulcers, the healing rate achieved by the chosen bandage needs to be carefully monitored, while also taking into consideration other factors such as the quality of life for the patient.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S20-S26
JournalBritish Journal of Community Nursing
Volume25
Issue numberSup6
Early online date2 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Jun 2020

Keywords

  • Compression therapy
  • Two-layer bandaging
  • Venous leg ulcers
  • Four-layer bandaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of different compression bandaging techniques on the healing rate of venous leg ulcers: a literature review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this