Effect of condensed heat acclimation on thermophysiological adaptations, hypoxic cross-tolerance, exercise performance, and deacclimation

  • Charlotte E Stevens
  • , Joseph T Costello
  • , Michael J Tipton
  • , Ella F Walker
  • , Alex A M Gould
  • , John S Young
  • , Ben J Lee
  • , Thomas B Williams
  • , Fiona A Myers
  • , Jo Corbett

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    43 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Short duration heat acclimation (HA) (≤5 daily heat exposures) elicits incomplete adaptation compared with longer interventions, possibly due to the lower accumulated thermal “dose.” It is unknown if matching thermal “dose” over a shorter timescale elicits comparable adaptation to a longer intervention. Using a parallel-groups design, we compared: 1) “condensed” HA (CHA; n = 17 males) consisting of 4 ͓ 75 min·day -1 heat exposures [target rectal temperature (T rec) = 38.5 ̥C] for two consecutive days, with 2) “traditional” HA (THA; n = 15 males) consisting of 1 ͓ 75 min·day -1 heat exposure (target T rec = 38.5 ̥C) for eight consecutive days. Physiological responses to exercise heat stress, hypoxia, and normoxic exercise performance were evaluated pre- and postintervention. Thermal (T rec over final 45 min: CHA = 38.45 ± 0.17 ̥C, THA = 38.53 ± 0.13 ̥C, P = 0.126) and cardiovascular strain were not different during interventions, indicating similar thermal “dose,” although CHA had lower sweating rate, higher starting T rec, and greater inflammation, gastrointestinal permeability, and renal stress (P < 0.05). However, CHA elicited an array of thermophysiological adaptations that did not differ from THA [reduced indices of peak thermal (e.g., D peak T rec CHA = -0.28 ± 0.26 ̥C, THA = -0.36 ± 0.17 ̥C, P = 0.303) and cardiovascular strain, inflammation, and renal stress; blood and plasma volume expansion; improved perceptual indices], although improvements in resting thermal strain (e.g., D resting T rec CHA = -0.14 ± 0.21 ̥C, THA = -0.35 ± 0.29 ̥C, P = 0.027) and sweating rate were less with CHA. Both interventions improved aspects of hypoxic tolerance, but effects on temperate normoxic exercise indices were limited. The diminished thermal strain was well-maintained over a 22-day decay period. In conclusion, CHA could represent a viable acclimation option for time-restricted young healthy males preparing for a hot, and possibly high-altitude, environment.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)634-650
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Applied Physiology
    Volume138
    Issue number3
    Early online date17 Jan 2025
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2025

    Bibliographical note

    Open access CC-BY

    Publisher Copyright:
    Copyright © 2025 The Authors.

    Funding

    We acknowledge the valuable pilot work of Jennifer Wright, Liam Colley, and Jim House; the laboratory technical support by Danny White and Harry Mayes; the guidance provided by Nicola Armstrong, Graham White, Katrina Hinde, and Daniel Piccolo; and the MSc students who assisted in the laboratory. This project was supported by grants from the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory.

    Funders
    Defence Science and Technology Laboratory

      Keywords

      • Humans
      • Male
      • Acclimatization/physiology
      • Hot Temperature
      • Exercise/physiology
      • Young Adult
      • Hypoxia/physiopathology
      • Adult
      • Adaptation, Physiological/physiology
      • Body Temperature Regulation/physiology
      • Body Temperature/physiology
      • Heat-Shock Response/physiology
      • Sweating/physiology
      • Thermotolerance/physiology
      • environmental physiology
      • cross-tolerance
      • acclimatization

      ASJC Scopus subject areas

      • General Medicine

      Fingerprint

      Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of condensed heat acclimation on thermophysiological adaptations, hypoxic cross-tolerance, exercise performance, and deacclimation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

      Cite this