Dual-Injection as a Knock Mitigation Strategy Using Pure Ethanol and Methanol

Ritchie Daniel, Chongming Wang, Hongming Xu, Guohong Tian, Dave Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For spark ignition (SI) engines, the optimum spark timing is crucial for maximum efficiency. However, as the spark timing is advanced, so the propensity to knock increases, thus compromising efficiency. One method to suppress knock is to use high octane fuel additives. However, the blend ratio of these additives cannot be varied on demand. Therefore, with the advent of aggressive downsizing, new knock mitigation techniques are required. Fortuitously, there are two well-known lower alcohols which exhibit attractive knock mitigation properties: ethanol and methanol. Both not only have high octane ratings, but also result in greater charge-cooling than with gasoline. In the current work, the authors have exploited these attractive properties with the dual-injection, or the dual-fuel concept (gasoline in PFI and fuel additive in DI) using pure ethanol and methanol. The single cylinder engine results at 1500 rpm (λ=1) show benefits to indicated efficiency and emissions (HC, CO and CO2) at almost every load (4.5 bar to 8.5 bar IMEP) compared to GDI. This is because the spark timing can be significantly advanced despite the use of relatively low blends (≤50%, by volume), which lowers the combustion duration and improves the conversion of fuel energy into useful work. Overall, these results reinforce the potential of the dual-injection concept to provide a platform for aggressive downsizing, whilst contributing to a renewable energy economy.
Original languageEnglish
Article number2012-01-1152
Pages (from-to)772-784
Number of pages13
JournalSAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants
Volume5
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2012

Fingerprint

Electric sparks
Fuel additives
Methanol
Ethanol
Gasoline
Engine cylinders
Internal combustion engines
Alcohols
Cooling

Cite this

Dual-Injection as a Knock Mitigation Strategy Using Pure Ethanol and Methanol. / Daniel, Ritchie; Wang, Chongming; Xu, Hongming; Tian, Guohong; Richardson, Dave.

In: SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2012-01-1152, 16.04.2012, p. 772-784.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Daniel, Ritchie ; Wang, Chongming ; Xu, Hongming ; Tian, Guohong ; Richardson, Dave. / Dual-Injection as a Knock Mitigation Strategy Using Pure Ethanol and Methanol. In: SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants. 2012 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 772-784.
@article{79a1bfa49a664b1d9c13e87c1a753bcb,
title = "Dual-Injection as a Knock Mitigation Strategy Using Pure Ethanol and Methanol",
abstract = "For spark ignition (SI) engines, the optimum spark timing is crucial for maximum efficiency. However, as the spark timing is advanced, so the propensity to knock increases, thus compromising efficiency. One method to suppress knock is to use high octane fuel additives. However, the blend ratio of these additives cannot be varied on demand. Therefore, with the advent of aggressive downsizing, new knock mitigation techniques are required. Fortuitously, there are two well-known lower alcohols which exhibit attractive knock mitigation properties: ethanol and methanol. Both not only have high octane ratings, but also result in greater charge-cooling than with gasoline. In the current work, the authors have exploited these attractive properties with the dual-injection, or the dual-fuel concept (gasoline in PFI and fuel additive in DI) using pure ethanol and methanol. The single cylinder engine results at 1500 rpm ({\^I}»=1) show benefits to indicated efficiency and emissions (HC, CO and CO2) at almost every load (4.5 bar to 8.5 bar IMEP) compared to GDI. This is because the spark timing can be significantly advanced despite the use of relatively low blends ({\^a}‰¤50{\%}, by volume), which lowers the combustion duration and improves the conversion of fuel energy into useful work. Overall, these results reinforce the potential of the dual-injection concept to provide a platform for aggressive downsizing, whilst contributing to a renewable energy economy.",
author = "Ritchie Daniel and Chongming Wang and Hongming Xu and Guohong Tian and Dave Richardson",
year = "2012",
month = "4",
day = "16",
doi = "10.4271/2012-01-1152",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "772--784",
journal = "SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants",
issn = "1946-3952",
publisher = "SAE International",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dual-Injection as a Knock Mitigation Strategy Using Pure Ethanol and Methanol

AU - Daniel, Ritchie

AU - Wang, Chongming

AU - Xu, Hongming

AU - Tian, Guohong

AU - Richardson, Dave

PY - 2012/4/16

Y1 - 2012/4/16

N2 - For spark ignition (SI) engines, the optimum spark timing is crucial for maximum efficiency. However, as the spark timing is advanced, so the propensity to knock increases, thus compromising efficiency. One method to suppress knock is to use high octane fuel additives. However, the blend ratio of these additives cannot be varied on demand. Therefore, with the advent of aggressive downsizing, new knock mitigation techniques are required. Fortuitously, there are two well-known lower alcohols which exhibit attractive knock mitigation properties: ethanol and methanol. Both not only have high octane ratings, but also result in greater charge-cooling than with gasoline. In the current work, the authors have exploited these attractive properties with the dual-injection, or the dual-fuel concept (gasoline in PFI and fuel additive in DI) using pure ethanol and methanol. The single cylinder engine results at 1500 rpm (λ=1) show benefits to indicated efficiency and emissions (HC, CO and CO2) at almost every load (4.5 bar to 8.5 bar IMEP) compared to GDI. This is because the spark timing can be significantly advanced despite the use of relatively low blends (≤50%, by volume), which lowers the combustion duration and improves the conversion of fuel energy into useful work. Overall, these results reinforce the potential of the dual-injection concept to provide a platform for aggressive downsizing, whilst contributing to a renewable energy economy.

AB - For spark ignition (SI) engines, the optimum spark timing is crucial for maximum efficiency. However, as the spark timing is advanced, so the propensity to knock increases, thus compromising efficiency. One method to suppress knock is to use high octane fuel additives. However, the blend ratio of these additives cannot be varied on demand. Therefore, with the advent of aggressive downsizing, new knock mitigation techniques are required. Fortuitously, there are two well-known lower alcohols which exhibit attractive knock mitigation properties: ethanol and methanol. Both not only have high octane ratings, but also result in greater charge-cooling than with gasoline. In the current work, the authors have exploited these attractive properties with the dual-injection, or the dual-fuel concept (gasoline in PFI and fuel additive in DI) using pure ethanol and methanol. The single cylinder engine results at 1500 rpm (λ=1) show benefits to indicated efficiency and emissions (HC, CO and CO2) at almost every load (4.5 bar to 8.5 bar IMEP) compared to GDI. This is because the spark timing can be significantly advanced despite the use of relatively low blends (≤50%, by volume), which lowers the combustion duration and improves the conversion of fuel energy into useful work. Overall, these results reinforce the potential of the dual-injection concept to provide a platform for aggressive downsizing, whilst contributing to a renewable energy economy.

U2 - 10.4271/2012-01-1152

DO - 10.4271/2012-01-1152

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 772

EP - 784

JO - SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants

JF - SAE International Journal of Fuels and Lubricants

SN - 1946-3952

IS - 2

M1 - 2012-01-1152

ER -