Driving style: How should an automated vehicle behave?

Luis Oliveira, Karl Proctor, Christopher G. Burns, Stewart Birrell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article reports on a study to investigate how the driving behaviour of autonomous vehicles influences trust and acceptance. Two different designs were presented to two groups of participants (n = 22/21), using actual autonomously driving vehicles. The first was a vehicle programmed to drive similarly to a human, "peeking" when approaching road junctions as if it was looking before proceeding. The second design had a vehicle programmed to convey the impression that it was communicating with other vehicles and infrastructure and "knew" if the junction was clear so could proceed without ever stopping or slowing down. Results showed non-significant differences in trust between the two vehicle behaviours. However, there were significant increases in trust scores overall for both designs as the trials progressed. Post-interaction interviews indicated that there were pros and cons for both driving styles, and participants suggested which aspects of the driving styles could be improved. This paper presents user information recommendations for the design and programming of driving systems for autonomous vehicles, with the aim of improving their users' trust and acceptance.

Original languageEnglish
Article number219
Number of pages20
JournalInformation (Switzerland)
Volume10
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 25 Jun 2019
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Keywords

  • Acceptance
  • Autonomous vehicles
  • Driving behaviour
  • Qualitative methods
  • User study
  • User-centred design

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Information Systems

Cite this

Driving style : How should an automated vehicle behave? / Oliveira, Luis; Proctor, Karl; Burns, Christopher G.; Birrell, Stewart.

In: Information (Switzerland), Vol. 10, No. 6, 219, 25.06.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oliveira, Luis ; Proctor, Karl ; Burns, Christopher G. ; Birrell, Stewart. / Driving style : How should an automated vehicle behave?. In: Information (Switzerland). 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 6.
@article{e0b52ddf448642c7a23801d2fff67234,
title = "Driving style: How should an automated vehicle behave?",
abstract = "This article reports on a study to investigate how the driving behaviour of autonomous vehicles influences trust and acceptance. Two different designs were presented to two groups of participants (n = 22/21), using actual autonomously driving vehicles. The first was a vehicle programmed to drive similarly to a human, {"}peeking{"} when approaching road junctions as if it was looking before proceeding. The second design had a vehicle programmed to convey the impression that it was communicating with other vehicles and infrastructure and {"}knew{"} if the junction was clear so could proceed without ever stopping or slowing down. Results showed non-significant differences in trust between the two vehicle behaviours. However, there were significant increases in trust scores overall for both designs as the trials progressed. Post-interaction interviews indicated that there were pros and cons for both driving styles, and participants suggested which aspects of the driving styles could be improved. This paper presents user information recommendations for the design and programming of driving systems for autonomous vehicles, with the aim of improving their users' trust and acceptance.",
keywords = "Acceptance, Autonomous vehicles, Driving behaviour, Qualitative methods, User study, User-centred design",
author = "Luis Oliveira and Karl Proctor and Burns, {Christopher G.} and Stewart Birrell",
note = "This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "25",
doi = "10.3390/INFO10060219",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Information (Switzerland)",
issn = "2078-2489",
publisher = "MDPI",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Driving style

T2 - How should an automated vehicle behave?

AU - Oliveira, Luis

AU - Proctor, Karl

AU - Burns, Christopher G.

AU - Birrell, Stewart

N1 - This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

PY - 2019/6/25

Y1 - 2019/6/25

N2 - This article reports on a study to investigate how the driving behaviour of autonomous vehicles influences trust and acceptance. Two different designs were presented to two groups of participants (n = 22/21), using actual autonomously driving vehicles. The first was a vehicle programmed to drive similarly to a human, "peeking" when approaching road junctions as if it was looking before proceeding. The second design had a vehicle programmed to convey the impression that it was communicating with other vehicles and infrastructure and "knew" if the junction was clear so could proceed without ever stopping or slowing down. Results showed non-significant differences in trust between the two vehicle behaviours. However, there were significant increases in trust scores overall for both designs as the trials progressed. Post-interaction interviews indicated that there were pros and cons for both driving styles, and participants suggested which aspects of the driving styles could be improved. This paper presents user information recommendations for the design and programming of driving systems for autonomous vehicles, with the aim of improving their users' trust and acceptance.

AB - This article reports on a study to investigate how the driving behaviour of autonomous vehicles influences trust and acceptance. Two different designs were presented to two groups of participants (n = 22/21), using actual autonomously driving vehicles. The first was a vehicle programmed to drive similarly to a human, "peeking" when approaching road junctions as if it was looking before proceeding. The second design had a vehicle programmed to convey the impression that it was communicating with other vehicles and infrastructure and "knew" if the junction was clear so could proceed without ever stopping or slowing down. Results showed non-significant differences in trust between the two vehicle behaviours. However, there were significant increases in trust scores overall for both designs as the trials progressed. Post-interaction interviews indicated that there were pros and cons for both driving styles, and participants suggested which aspects of the driving styles could be improved. This paper presents user information recommendations for the design and programming of driving systems for autonomous vehicles, with the aim of improving their users' trust and acceptance.

KW - Acceptance

KW - Autonomous vehicles

KW - Driving behaviour

KW - Qualitative methods

KW - User study

KW - User-centred design

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85069827436&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/INFO10060219

DO - 10.3390/INFO10060219

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Information (Switzerland)

JF - Information (Switzerland)

SN - 2078-2489

IS - 6

M1 - 219

ER -