Drawing a Synergy between Theory and Practice - A Move towards a More Stakeholder-Oriented Regulatory Framework for Modern Islamic Finance Institutions: A Comparative Analysis

Sheharyar Hamid

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This article argues that the Islamic finance (IF) industry, in its ideological foundations is very similar to the stakeholder and Business ethics theory in western though. The paper further argues that the principles of Maqasid al sharia and Maslaha form the basis of the Islamic finance jurisprudence and need to be applied throughout the Industry via regulatory standards. However, industry practices of the IF industry do not always follow the Maqasid and Maslaha principles primarily because of the lack of regulation and standard setting at the international level. This article examines the different regulatory framework that are being utilised in different jurisdictions to regulate the Islamic finance Industry. This article takes the examples of Pakistan, Kuwait and the UK as representing three different regulatory frameworks in practice around the globe and then suggests the best possible method of incorporating the Maqasid and Maslaha into the regulation and practice of Islamic finance via a principle based Meta regulatory framework. We take an example from the Basel accord on banking best practices and argue that the Islamic finance industry also needs an International Meta regulatory framework like Basel, which can cater to the specific needs of the IF industry globally, even where jurisdictions do not accept Islamic law as a valid source of law so that the IF industry can incorporate the Maqasid of financial intermediation i.e. to ensure socio-economic justice in society.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationThe Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law
PublisherBrill
Chapter4
Pages117-147
Number of pages31
Volume2
Edition2
ISBN (Print)978-90-04-34687-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Islamic finance
Regulatory framework
Industry
Stakeholders
Synergy
Comparative analysis
Jurisdiction
Globe
Socio-economics
Pakistan
Business ethics
Islamic law
Basel Accord
Economic justice
Kuwait
Basel
Best practice
Banking
Financial intermediation

Keywords

  • Islamic finance
  • Regulation
  • Corporate Governance
  • Stakeholder theory
  • comparative law

Cite this

Drawing a Synergy between Theory and Practice - A Move towards a More Stakeholder-Oriented Regulatory Framework for Modern Islamic Finance Institutions : A Comparative Analysis. / Hamid, Sheharyar.

The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. Vol. 2 2. ed. Brill, 2018. p. 117-147.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

@inbook{2ead3e646e3b49aaa638a9dea387a263,
title = "Drawing a Synergy between Theory and Practice - A Move towards a More Stakeholder-Oriented Regulatory Framework for Modern Islamic Finance Institutions: A Comparative Analysis",
abstract = "This article argues that the Islamic finance (IF) industry, in its ideological foundations is very similar to the stakeholder and Business ethics theory in western though. The paper further argues that the principles of Maqasid al sharia and Maslaha form the basis of the Islamic finance jurisprudence and need to be applied throughout the Industry via regulatory standards. However, industry practices of the IF industry do not always follow the Maqasid and Maslaha principles primarily because of the lack of regulation and standard setting at the international level. This article examines the different regulatory framework that are being utilised in different jurisdictions to regulate the Islamic finance Industry. This article takes the examples of Pakistan, Kuwait and the UK as representing three different regulatory frameworks in practice around the globe and then suggests the best possible method of incorporating the Maqasid and Maslaha into the regulation and practice of Islamic finance via a principle based Meta regulatory framework. We take an example from the Basel accord on banking best practices and argue that the Islamic finance industry also needs an International Meta regulatory framework like Basel, which can cater to the specific needs of the IF industry globally, even where jurisdictions do not accept Islamic law as a valid source of law so that the IF industry can incorporate the Maqasid of financial intermediation i.e. to ensure socio-economic justice in society.",
keywords = "Islamic finance, Regulation, Corporate Governance, Stakeholder theory, comparative law",
author = "Sheharyar Hamid",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
day = "13",
doi = "10.1163/9789004346888_005",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-90-04-34687-1",
volume = "2",
pages = "117--147",
booktitle = "The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law",
publisher = "Brill",
edition = "2",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Drawing a Synergy between Theory and Practice - A Move towards a More Stakeholder-Oriented Regulatory Framework for Modern Islamic Finance Institutions

T2 - A Comparative Analysis

AU - Hamid, Sheharyar

PY - 2018/8/13

Y1 - 2018/8/13

N2 - This article argues that the Islamic finance (IF) industry, in its ideological foundations is very similar to the stakeholder and Business ethics theory in western though. The paper further argues that the principles of Maqasid al sharia and Maslaha form the basis of the Islamic finance jurisprudence and need to be applied throughout the Industry via regulatory standards. However, industry practices of the IF industry do not always follow the Maqasid and Maslaha principles primarily because of the lack of regulation and standard setting at the international level. This article examines the different regulatory framework that are being utilised in different jurisdictions to regulate the Islamic finance Industry. This article takes the examples of Pakistan, Kuwait and the UK as representing three different regulatory frameworks in practice around the globe and then suggests the best possible method of incorporating the Maqasid and Maslaha into the regulation and practice of Islamic finance via a principle based Meta regulatory framework. We take an example from the Basel accord on banking best practices and argue that the Islamic finance industry also needs an International Meta regulatory framework like Basel, which can cater to the specific needs of the IF industry globally, even where jurisdictions do not accept Islamic law as a valid source of law so that the IF industry can incorporate the Maqasid of financial intermediation i.e. to ensure socio-economic justice in society.

AB - This article argues that the Islamic finance (IF) industry, in its ideological foundations is very similar to the stakeholder and Business ethics theory in western though. The paper further argues that the principles of Maqasid al sharia and Maslaha form the basis of the Islamic finance jurisprudence and need to be applied throughout the Industry via regulatory standards. However, industry practices of the IF industry do not always follow the Maqasid and Maslaha principles primarily because of the lack of regulation and standard setting at the international level. This article examines the different regulatory framework that are being utilised in different jurisdictions to regulate the Islamic finance Industry. This article takes the examples of Pakistan, Kuwait and the UK as representing three different regulatory frameworks in practice around the globe and then suggests the best possible method of incorporating the Maqasid and Maslaha into the regulation and practice of Islamic finance via a principle based Meta regulatory framework. We take an example from the Basel accord on banking best practices and argue that the Islamic finance industry also needs an International Meta regulatory framework like Basel, which can cater to the specific needs of the IF industry globally, even where jurisdictions do not accept Islamic law as a valid source of law so that the IF industry can incorporate the Maqasid of financial intermediation i.e. to ensure socio-economic justice in society.

KW - Islamic finance

KW - Regulation

KW - Corporate Governance

KW - Stakeholder theory

KW - comparative law

U2 - 10.1163/9789004346888_005

DO - 10.1163/9789004346888_005

M3 - Chapter

SN - 978-90-04-34687-1

VL - 2

SP - 117

EP - 147

BT - The Asian Yearbook of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law

PB - Brill

ER -