Abstract
Directly observed treatment short course (DOTS) has been the recommended strategy for Tuberculosis (TB) control since 1995. Developed as an alternative to inpatient treatment, it involves observation of patients' medication intake to promote adherence. However, the burden of daily clinic visits may affect access to care. Using a mixed methods approach, we consider whether (1) non-adherence differs systematically between patients required to make daily clinic visits and patients cared for under less frequent clinic visits and (2) the association between frequency of required clinic visits and adherence depends on affordability and acceptability of care. Data were collected in facility exit interviews with 1200 TB patients in two rural and two urban sub-districts in South Africa. Additionally, 17 in-depth interviews were completed with TB patients. After controlling for socioeconomic and demographic factors, patient type (new or retreatment) and treatment duration, regression analyses showed that daily attending patients were over twice as likely to report a missed clinic visit (P
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 454-461 |
Journal | Health Policy and Planning |
Volume | 31 |
Issue number | 4 |
Early online date | 15 Sept 2015 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2016 |
Bibliographical note
This article is not available on the repositoryKeywords
- Access
- DOTS
- equity
- socio-economic status
- South Africa
- tuberculosis
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Does treatment collection and observation each day keep the patient away? An analysis of the determinants of adherence among patients with Tuberculosis in South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Jana Fried
- Centre for Agroecology, Water and Resilience - Assistant Professor
Person: Teaching and Research