Does Moderation Pay in a Consociational Democracy? The Marginalisation of the SDLP in the North of Ireland

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A central question in the debate between “centripetalists” and “consociationalists” concerns whether power‐sharing arrangements provide incentives for moderation. This article helps to formulate an empirical answer through an examination of the electoral decline of the Social Democratic and Labour Party (SDLP) following the Good Friday Agreement (GFA) in the North of Ireland. Drawing on primary qualitative interviews with key players, this article argues that the SDLP were electoral losers under a system of ethnic out‐flanking. Sinn Féin has successfully presented itself as the “greener” and more robust representative of nationalist interests, whilst simultaneously moderating its message and operating the institutions of Northern Ireland. Sinn Féin has taken ownership of the GFA and has positioned itself as the party best able to ensure its delivery. Sinn Féin’s rights‐based agenda, and vibrant electoral machine, has resonated with the nationalist electorate who are less sure of what the contemporary SDLP stands for.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)426-449
    Number of pages24
    JournalSwiss Political Science Review
    Volume25
    Issue number4
    Early online date18 Jul 2019
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Dec 2019

    Keywords

    • Consociationalism
    • Moderation
    • Northern Ireland
    • SDLP
    • Sinn Féin

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Political Science and International Relations

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does Moderation Pay in a Consociational Democracy? The Marginalisation of the SDLP in the North of Ireland'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this