Does 'Equity's Darling' need a Legal Title?  Reassessing Pilcher v Rawlins

Adam Reilly

Does 'Equity's Darling' need a Legal Title? Reassessing Pilcher v Rawlins

Adam Reilly

School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Introduction Though there is doubtless value in dusting off and re-examining fundamental legal doctrines, this surely could not apply to ‘equity’s darling’?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	89-114
Journal	Journal of Equity
Publication status	Published - Dec 2016

Access to Document

http://lexisweb.lexisnexis.com.au/JournalOverview.aspx?id=10JOE089

Cite this

@article{70e886bc7c5c4821a9c711e24113fa17,

title = "Does 'Equity's Darling' need a Legal Title? Reassessing Pilcher v Rawlins",

abstract = "Introduction Though there is doubtless value in dusting off and re-examining fundamental legal doctrines, this surely could not apply to {\textquoteleft}equity{\textquoteright}s darling{\textquoteright}? ",

author = "Adam Reilly",

year = "2016",

month = dec,

language = "English",

pages = "89--114",

journal = "Journal of Equity",

publisher = "LexisNexis",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does 'Equity's Darling' need a Legal Title? Reassessing Pilcher v Rawlins

AU - Reilly, Adam

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - Introduction Though there is doubtless value in dusting off and re-examining fundamental legal doctrines, this surely could not apply to ‘equity’s darling’?

AB - Introduction Though there is doubtless value in dusting off and re-examining fundamental legal doctrines, this surely could not apply to ‘equity’s darling’?

M3 - Article

SP - 89

EP - 114

JO - Journal of Equity

JF - Journal of Equity

ER -

Does 'Equity's Darling' need a Legal Title? Reassessing Pilcher v Rawlins

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this