Does Collaboration Pay in Agricultural Supply Chain? An Empirical Approach

Stella Despoudi, Grammatoula Papaioannou, George Saridakis, Samir Dani

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    65 Citations (Scopus)
    124 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This paper examines the effect of different types of collaboration on the level of Postharvest Food Losses (PHFL) and the proportion of low-quality peaches produced using a unique data-set of Greek peach producers. Quantile regression techniques are adopted to estimate the effects at different points of the conditional distribution of our variables of interest. The findings of this study suggest that high levels of collaboration between producers and cooperatives are associated with both low levels of PHFL and a low proportion of low-quality peaches. We also find that specific types of collaboration, such as ‘goal congruence’, can play a significant role in reducing PHFL and improving the quality of peach production at the extremes of the distribution. Important policy implications regarding collaborative practices and systems that can be implemented to reduce PHFL and boost a producer’s performance together with sustainability credentials are drawn from this study.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)4396-4417
    Number of pages22
    JournalInternational Journal of Production Research
    Volume56
    Issue number13
    Early online date5 Mar 2018
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Bibliographical note

    This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in
    International Journal of Production Research on 05/03/2018, available
    online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00207543.2018.1440654

    Keywords

    • agricultural supply chain
    • postharvest food loss
    • supply chain collaboration
    • performance measures
    • empirical study

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Does Collaboration Pay in Agricultural Supply Chain? An Empirical Approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this